GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  He ---- (win) next time.Correct answer is 'wi... Start Learning for Free
He ---- (win) next time.
Correct answer is 'will win'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
He ---- (win) next time.Correct answer is 'will win'. Can you explain ...
Explanation:
To explain why the answer is "will win," we can break it down into several key points:
Future tense:
- The sentence is written in the future tense, indicating that the action of winning will occur in the future.
- In English, we use "will" to express the future tense.
Subject-verb agreement:
- The subject of the sentence is "He," which is a third-person singular pronoun.
- In English, when the subject is a third-person singular pronoun, we add an "-s" or "-es" to the base form of the verb.
- The base form of the verb "win" becomes "wins" in the present tense (e.g., "He wins").
- However, in the future tense, we use the base form of the verb without any changes (e.g., "He will win").
Contextual clues:
- The phrase "next time" suggests that the action of winning did not occur in a previous instance.
- By using the future tense, the sentence implies that the person (referenced by "he") did not win in a previous situation but has the potential to win in the future.
Therefore, based on the rules of future tense, subject-verb agreement, and the contextual clues provided, the correct answer is "will win."
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
He ---- (win) next time.Correct answer is 'will win'. Can you explain ...
The use of "will" to indicate future actions

The correct answer to the given sentence is "will win," which uses the modal verb "will" to indicate a future action. In English grammar, "will" is commonly used to express predictions, promises, offers, and decisions about the future. Let's delve into the details of why "will win" is the appropriate choice in this context.

1. The future tense

When we talk about actions that will happen in the future, we use the future tense. In this case, the action being referred to is winning, which implies that it has not yet occurred. By using "will," we are indicating that the action will take place in the future, specifically the next time.

2. Modal verb "will"

The modal verb "will" is used to express future actions in English. It is followed by the base form of the verb, which in this case is "win." By using "will win," we are specifying that the subject will achieve victory in the next occurrence.

3. Affirmative sentence structure

In affirmative sentences, the subject is followed by the modal verb "will," and then the base form of the verb. This structure is used when making predictions or stating facts about future events. In this sentence, the subject is not specified, but it can be inferred from the context. For example, if the sentence is part of a conversation about a sports match, the subject could be a particular team or player.

4. Contextual interpretation

Without further context, it is difficult to determine the exact meaning or situation being described in the sentence. However, based on the given information, we can assume that the speaker is expressing confidence or making a prediction about the future success of someone or something. The use of "will win" implies a positive outcome in the next occurrence, suggesting that the subject has the capability or potential to be victorious.

In conclusion, the correct answer "will win" follows the rules of using the future tense and the modal verb "will" to express a future action. The sentence indicates a positive outcome or prediction for the next occurrence, without specifying the subject.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Read the passage and answer the question given below.The study of the analog position of mental representation has many fascinating branches which help illuminate the inner workings of our minds and how we perceive images in our mind‘s eye. This theory points to the link between the time it takes to solve mental problems and their complexity.In a now-famous study, Stephen Kosslyn asked subjects to imagine an animal, such as a rabbit, next to either an elephant or a fly. When the image was formed, Kosslyn would ask whether or not the target animal had a particular attribute. For example, Kosslyn might say, elephant, rabbit, and then leg. He found that it took subjects longer to answer when the target animal was next to the large animal than when it was next to the small animal. Kosslyn interpreted this to mean that subjects had to zoom in on the image to detect the particular feature. Just as one has difficulty seeing details on small objects, so the subjects could not simply mentally see details on the smaller object in their mental image.Second, Kosslyn and colleagues demonstrated that the time it takes to scan between two points depends on the distance between the two points [in a memorized image]. In one experiment, subjects memorized an array of letters separated by different distances. Kosslyn found that the farther apart the letters were from each other, the longer it took to answer questions about one of the letters. One of the principal hypotheses of the analog position of mental representation, which is the idea that mental processing requires one to move sequentially through all intervening steps to solve a problem, is that mental images have regular properties.In a similar experiment, Kosslyn had subjects memorize pictures of objects like a plane or a motorboat. Then he had them focus on one part of the object (e.g., the motor) and move to another (e.g., the anchor). He found that the time it took to determine whether the second part was present depended on the distance between the two parts in the memorized picture.Using a completely different paradigm, Shepard and Feng tested the amount of time that it would take for subjects to specify whether two arrows on unfolded blocks matched up. They found a linear relationship between the number of folds between the arrows and the time it took to make this judgment, suggesting that subjects went through a discrete series of organized steps in order to solve this problem.The final type of experiment showing that mental images have regular properties is perhaps the most famous: mental rotation experiments. In 1971, Shepard and Metzler tested subjects‘ abilities to make complex figure comparisons. They presented subjects with a three dimensional standard figure and a comparison figure which was either identical to the standard figure, or its mirror image; the comparison stimulus was rotated, either clockwise or into the third dimension. Shepard and Metzler found that the time needed to judge whether the comparison stimulus was identical or a mirror image depended directly on the size of the angle between the target orientation and the orientation of the standard.Q.According to the scanning experiments mentioned in the passage, it should take longer to scan longer distances because the subjects

Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.No one can say where the bones of Machiavelli rest, but modern Florence has decreed him a stately cenotaph in Santa Croce, by the side of her most famous sons, recognizing that, whatever other nations may have found in his works, Italy found in them the idea of her unity and the germs of her renaissance among the nations of Europe. Whilst it is idle to protest against the world-wide and evil signification of his name, it may be pointed out that the harsh construction of his doctrine which this sinister reputation implies was unknown to his own day, and that the researches of recent times have enabled us to interpret him more reasonably. It is due to these inquiries that the shape of an “unholy necromancer,” which so long haunted men’s vision, has begun to fade.Machiavelli was undoubtedly a man of great observation, acuteness, and industry noting with appreciative eye whatever passed before him, and with his supreme literary gift turning it to account in his enforced retirement from affairs. He does not present himself, nor is he depicted by his contemporaries, as a type of that rare combination, the successful statesman and author, for he appears to have been only moderately prosperous in his several embassies and political employments. He was misled by Catherina Sforza, ignored by Louis XII, overawed by Cesare Borgia; several of his embassies were quite barren of results; his attempts to fortify Florence failed, and the soldiery that he raised astonished everybody by their cowardice. In the conduct of his own affairs he was timid and time-serving; he dared not appear by the side of Soderini, to whom he owed so much, for fear of compromising himself; his connection with the Medici was open to suspicion, and Giuliano appears to have recognized his real forte when he set him to write the “History of Florence,” rather than employ him in the state. It is on the literary side of his character, and there alone, that we find no weakness and no failure.Q. According to the information in the passage, why did Italy provide Machiavelli a cenotaph next to her most famous sons?

Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question as follow:Ralph Waldo Emerson was born in Boston on May 25, 1803. He was descended from a long line of New England ministers, men of refinement and education. As a school-boy, he was quiet and retiring, reading a great deal, but not paying much attention to his lessons. He entered Harvard at the early age of fourteen, but never attained a high rank there, although he took a prize for an essay on Socrates, and was made class poet after several others had declined. Next to his reserve and the faultless propriety of his conduct, his contemporaries at college seemed most impressed by the great maturity of his mind. Emerson appears never to have been really a boy. He was always serene and thoughtful, impressing all who knew him with that spirituality which was his most distinguishing characteristic.After graduating from college, he taught school for a time, and then entered the Harvard Divinity School under Dr. Channing, the great Unitarian preacher. Although he was not strong enough to attend all the lectures of the divinity course, the college authorities deemed the name Emerson sufficient passport to the ministry. He was accordingly “approbated to preach” by the Middlesex Association of Ministers on October 10, 1826. As a preacher, Emerson was interesting, though not particularly original. His talent seems to have been in giving new meaning to the old truths of religion. One of his hearers has said: “In looking back on his preaching, I find he has impressed truths to which I always assented in such a manner as to make them appear new, like a clearer revelation.” Although his sermons were always couched in scriptural language, they were touched with the light of that genius which avoids the conventional and commonplace. In his other pastoral duties, Emerson was not quite so successful. It is characteristic of his deep humanity and his dislike for all fuss and commonplace that he appeared to least advantage at a funeral. A connoisseur in such matters, an old sexton, once remarked that on such occasions “he did not appear at ease at all. To tell the truth, in my opinion, that young man was not born to be a minister.”Q.What is the main purpose of the author in writing the passage?

Top Courses for GMAT

He ---- (win) next time.Correct answer is 'will win'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
He ---- (win) next time.Correct answer is 'will win'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about He ---- (win) next time.Correct answer is 'will win'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for He ---- (win) next time.Correct answer is 'will win'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for He ---- (win) next time.Correct answer is 'will win'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of He ---- (win) next time.Correct answer is 'will win'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of He ---- (win) next time.Correct answer is 'will win'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for He ---- (win) next time.Correct answer is 'will win'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of He ---- (win) next time.Correct answer is 'will win'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice He ---- (win) next time.Correct answer is 'will win'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev