Question Description
College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.