GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > College football recruiting services rank inc...
Start Learning for Free
College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.
Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?
- a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positions
- b)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial ranking
- c)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positions
- d)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing styles
- e)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different rates
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale ...
The passage mentions that the post-career average for 5-star players is 4.46, which is lower than their initial 5-star ranking. This suggests that the ranking system does not effectively judge high-end talent, as the most elite players are not able to surpass their initial high ranking.
Option (B) addresses this problem by pointing out that a five-star scale may not adequately account for the potential for elite players to overperform their initial ranking. The scale might not provide enough granularity to distinguish between the very best players, leading to a situation where players with tremendous careers still have post-career averages slightly below the maximum rating.
The other options (A, C, D, and E) introduce potential issues related to judging players, but they do not directly address the problem of the ranking system limiting the ability of the most elite players to surpass their initial ratings, as stated in the passage. Therefore, option (B) is the most appropriate choice.
Most Upvoted Answer
College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale ...
Understanding the Issue with Star Ratings
The validation attempt by the ranking service highlights a significant flaw in the way they assess high-end talent compared to middle-tier players.
Limitations of the 5-Star Scale
- The 5-star rating system inherently limits the ability to distinguish between the most elite players.
- Players rated as 5-stars are already considered the best, which may prevent them from being recognized for their potential to exceed expectations.
- This limitation leads to an underrepresentation of exceptional performances by these elite players, skewing the average ratings.
Comparative Performance Evaluation
- When evaluating players who are rated lower, like 3-stars, there is more room for improvement and development, which can lead to higher average post-career ratings.
- Conversely, 5-star players may not significantly outperform their initial rankings because their starting point is already at the highest level.
Conclusion
The attempt to validate rankings may show that while the service is effective for middle-tier talent, it fails to accurately assess and capture the true potential and performance of high-end players. This discrepancy raises concerns about the validity of their ranking system and suggests a need for a more nuanced approach to evaluating elite talent.
The validation attempt by the ranking service highlights a significant flaw in the way they assess high-end talent compared to middle-tier players.
Limitations of the 5-Star Scale
- The 5-star rating system inherently limits the ability to distinguish between the most elite players.
- Players rated as 5-stars are already considered the best, which may prevent them from being recognized for their potential to exceed expectations.
- This limitation leads to an underrepresentation of exceptional performances by these elite players, skewing the average ratings.
Comparative Performance Evaluation
- When evaluating players who are rated lower, like 3-stars, there is more room for improvement and development, which can lead to higher average post-career ratings.
- Conversely, 5-star players may not significantly outperform their initial rankings because their starting point is already at the highest level.
Conclusion
The attempt to validate rankings may show that while the service is effective for middle-tier talent, it fails to accurately assess and capture the true potential and performance of high-end players. This discrepancy raises concerns about the validity of their ranking system and suggests a need for a more nuanced approach to evaluating elite talent.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for GMATView all
Question Description
College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice College football recruiting services rank incoming players on a scale of 1-star (not a highly sought-after prospect) to 5-star (considered to be the best players). Recently a service attempted to validate its rankings by assigning star ratings to players upon completion of their careers to determine the accuracy of the initial rankings. The survey averaged the post-career ratings of each player and found that 5-star players’ final average was 4.46, compared with 3.98 for 4-stars and 3.11 for 3-stars. This suggests that the rankings services do not effectively judge high-end talent as well as they judge players in the middle of the range.Q. Which of the following identifies a problem with the service’s attempt to validate its rankings?a)Players at certain positions might be harder to judge at a younger age than players at other positionsb)A five-star scale does not allow the most elite players to overperform their initial rankingc)Players may change positions over their careers and be judged at multiple different positionsd)Some players transfer to different schools and therefore need to change their playing stylese)Because of differences in strength training programs at different schools, players may develop at different ratesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup on EduRev and stay on top of your study goals
10M+ students crushing their study goals daily