Works of moral philosophy, such as Platos Republic or Aristotles Nicomachean Ethics, are partly concerned with how to live a morally good life. But philosopher Jonathan Barnes argues that works that present a method of living such a life without also supplying a motive are inherently useful only to those already wishing to be morally goodandmdash;those with no desire for moral goodness will not choose to follow their rules. However, some works of moral philosophy attempt to describe what constitutes a morally good life while also proposing reasons for living one.Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?a)It mentions two renowned works and then claims that despite their popularity it is impossible for these works to serve the purpose their authors intended.b)It summarizes the history of a field of thought by discussing two works and then proposes a topic of further research for specialists in that field.c)It describes two influential works and then explains why one is more widely read than the other.d)It provides a characterization about a field of thought by noting two works in it and then details a way in which some works in that field are more comprehensive than others.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

SAT Exam > SAT Questions > Works of moral philosophy, such as Platos Rep...

Works of moral philosophy, such as Plato's Republic or Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, are partly concerned with how to live a morally good life. But philosopher Jonathan Barnes argues that works that present a method of living such a life without also supplying a motive are inherently useful only to those already wishing to be morally good—those with no desire for moral goodness will not choose to follow their rules. However, some works of moral philosophy attempt to describe what constitutes a morally good life while also proposing reasons for living one.

Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?

a)
It mentions two renowned works and then claims that despite their popularity it is impossible for these works to serve the purpose their authors intended.
b)
It summarizes the history of a field of thought by discussing two works and then proposes a topic of further research for specialists in that field.
c)
It describes two influential works and then explains why one is more widely read than the other.
d)
It provides a characterization about a field of thought by noting two works in it and then details a way in which some works in that field are more comprehensive than others.

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

Works of moral philosophy, such as Platos Republic or Aristotles Nicom...

Choice A. This is too extreme. The text never mentions whether the two works are popular or not, and it never argues that these works don't serve their intended purpose of describing how to live a morally good life. Rather, the text claims that works of moral philosophy that don't include both how and why to be moral are not useful to readers who don't already want to be moral.

Choice B. This isn't the overall structure. The text never discusses the history of moral philosophy at all, and it doesn't propose any topic for further research.

Choice C. This isn't the overall structure. The text never discusses which of the two works is more widely read.

Choice D. This is the best choice. The text starts by stating what moral philosophy is concerned with and naming two examples of works in the field. Then it describes a shortcoming of some works in that field (they say how but not why), and finally it states that other works try to avoid that shortcoming (by including both how and why to live a morally good life).

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

Works of moral philosophy, such as Platos Republic or Aristotles Nicom...

Overall Structure of the Text

Introduction:
The text introduces the argument presented by philosopher Jonathan Barnes regarding works of moral philosophy.

Main Point:
Jonathan Barnes argues that works of moral philosophy that only present a method of living a morally good life without providing a motive are limited in their usefulness.

Comparison of Works:
- The text mentions works such as Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics as examples of works that present a method for living a morally good life.
- It highlights that these works may not be effective for individuals who do not already desire moral goodness.

Proposed Solution:
- Some works of moral philosophy not only describe what constitutes a morally good life but also provide reasons for living one.
- These works are more comprehensive and can appeal to a wider audience, including those who may not initially desire moral goodness.

Conclusion:
- The text concludes by emphasizing the importance of works of moral philosophy that offer both guidance on living a morally good life and motivations for doing so.

Answered by Orion Classes · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for SAT exam

Similar SAT Doubts

Question based on the following passage.This passage is adapted from Bertrand Russell, A History of Western Philosophy. ©1945 by Bertrand Russell, renewed by Edith Russell. Reprinted with permission of Simon & Schuster.To understand the views of Aristotle, as of mostGreeks, on physics, it is necessary to apprehendhis imaginative background. Every philosopher,in addition to the formal system that he offers to(5) the world, has another much simpler system ofwhich he may be quite unaware. If he is aware ofit, he probably realizes that it wont quite do; hetherefore conceals it, and sets forth something moresophisticated, which he believes because it is like(10) his crude system, but which he asks others to acceptbecause he thinks he has made it such as cannotbe disproved. The sophistication comes in by wayof refutation of refutations, but this alone will nevergive a positive result. It shows, at best, that a theory(15) may be true, not that it must be. The positive result,however little the philosopher may realize it, isdue to his imaginative preconceptions, or to whatSantayana calls “animal faith.”In relation to physics, Aristotles imaginative(20) background was very different from that of amodern student. Nowadays, students begin withmechanics, which, by its very name, suggestsmachines. They are accustomed to automobilesand airplanes; they do not, even in the dimmest(25) recesses of their subconscious imagination,think that an automobile contains some sort ofhorse inside, or that an airplane flies becauseits wings are those of a bird possessing magicalpowers. Animals have lost their importance in(30) our imaginative pictures of the world, in whichhumans stand comparatively alone as masters ofa mainly lifeless and largely subservient materialenvironment.To the ancient Greek, attempting to give(35) a scientific account of motion, the purelymechanical view hardly suggested itself,except in the case of a few men of genius suchas Democritus and Archimedes. Two sets ofphenomena seemed important: the movements(40) of animals, and the movements of the heavenlybodies. To the modern man of science, the bodyof an animal is a very elaborate machine, withan enormously complex physical and chemicalstructure. Every new discovery consists in(45) diminishing the apparent gulf between animalsand machines. To the Greek, it seemed morenatural to assimilate apparently lifeless motionsto those of animals. A child still distinguishes liveanimals from other things by the fact that animals(50) can move themselves. To many Greeks, andespecially to Aristotle, this peculiarity suggesteditself as the basis of a general theory of physics.But how about the heavenly bodies? Theydiffer from animals by the regularity of their(55) movements, but this may be only due to theirsuperior perfection. Every Greek philosopher,whatever he may have come to think in adult life,had been taught in childhood to regard the sunand moon as gods. Anaxagoras was prosecuted(60) for impiety because he thought that they werenot alive. It was natural that a philosopher whocould no longer regard the heavenly bodiesthemselves as divine should think of them asmoved by the will of a Divine Being who had a(65) Hellenic love of order and geometric simplicity.Thus the ultimate source of all movement isWill: on earth the capricious Will of humanbeings, but in heaven the unchanging Will of theSupreme Artificer.Q.Which sentence provides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question?

View answer

Question based on the following passage.This passage is adapted from Bertrand Russell, A History of Western Philosophy. ©1945 by Bertrand Russell, renewed by Edith Russell. Reprinted with permission of Simon & Schuster.To understand the views of Aristotle, as of mostGreeks, on physics, it is necessary to apprehendhis imaginative background. Every philosopher,in addition to the formal system that he offers to(5) the world, has another much simpler system ofwhich he may be quite unaware. If he is aware ofit, he probably realizes that it wont quite do; hetherefore conceals it, and sets forth something moresophisticated, which he believes because it is like(10) his crude system, but which he asks others to acceptbecause he thinks he has made it such as cannotbe disproved. The sophistication comes in by wayof refutation of refutations, but this alone will nevergive a positive result. It shows, at best, that a theory(15) may be true, not that it must be. The positive result,however little the philosopher may realize it, isdue to his imaginative preconceptions, or to whatSantayana calls “animal faith.”In relation to physics, Aristotles imaginative(20) background was very different from that of amodern student. Nowadays, students begin withmechanics, which, by its very name, suggestsmachines. They are accustomed to automobilesand airplanes; they do not, even in the dimmest(25) recesses of their subconscious imagination,think that an automobile contains some sort ofhorse inside, or that an airplane flies becauseits wings are those of a bird possessing magicalpowers. Animals have lost their importance in(30) our imaginative pictures of the world, in whichhumans stand comparatively alone as masters ofa mainly lifeless and largely subservient materialenvironment.To the ancient Greek, attempting to give(35) a scientific account of motion, the purelymechanical view hardly suggested itself,except in the case of a few men of genius suchas Democritus and Archimedes. Two sets ofphenomena seemed important: the movements(40) of animals, and the movements of the heavenlybodies. To the modern man of science, the bodyof an animal is a very elaborate machine, withan enormously complex physical and chemicalstructure. Every new discovery consists in(45) diminishing the apparent gulf between animalsand machines. To the Greek, it seemed morenatural to assimilate apparently lifeless motionsto those of animals. A child still distinguishes liveanimals from other things by the fact that animals(50) can move themselves. To many Greeks, andespecially to Aristotle, this peculiarity suggesteditself as the basis of a general theory of physics.But how about the heavenly bodies? Theydiffer from animals by the regularity of their(55) movements, but this may be only due to theirsuperior perfection. Every Greek philosopher,whatever he may have come to think in adult life,had been taught in childhood to regard the sunand moon as gods. Anaxagoras was prosecuted(60) for impiety because he thought that they werenot alive. It was natural that a philosopher whocould no longer regard the heavenly bodiesthemselves as divine should think of them asmoved by the will of a Divine Being who had a(65) Hellenic love of order and geometric simplicity.Thus the ultimate source of all movement isWill: on earth the capricious Will of humanbeings, but in heaven the unchanging Will of theSupreme Artificer.Q.Which of the following statements about ancient Greek philosophers is best supported by the passage?

View answer

Question based on the following passage.This passage is adapted from Bertrand Russell, A History of Western Philosophy. ©1945 by Bertrand Russell, renewed by Edith Russell. Reprinted with permission of Simon & Schuster.To understand the views of Aristotle, as of mostGreeks, on physics, it is necessary to apprehendhis imaginative background. Every philosopher,in addition to the formal system that he offers to(5) the world, has another much simpler system ofwhich he may be quite unaware. If he is aware ofit, he probably realizes that it wont quite do; hetherefore conceals it, and sets forth something moresophisticated, which he believes because it is like(10) his crude system, but which he asks others to acceptbecause he thinks he has made it such as cannotbe disproved. The sophistication comes in by wayof refutation of refutations, but this alone will nevergive a positive result. It shows, at best, that a theory(15) may be true, not that it must be. The positive result,however little the philosopher may realize it, isdue to his imaginative preconceptions, or to whatSantayana calls “animal faith.”In relation to physics, Aristotles imaginative(20) background was very different from that of amodern student. Nowadays, students begin withmechanics, which, by its very name, suggestsmachines. They are accustomed to automobilesand airplanes; they do not, even in the dimmest(25) recesses of their subconscious imagination,think that an automobile contains some sort ofhorse inside, or that an airplane flies becauseits wings are those of a bird possessing magicalpowers. Animals have lost their importance in(30) our imaginative pictures of the world, in whichhumans stand comparatively alone as masters ofa mainly lifeless and largely subservient materialenvironment.To the ancient Greek, attempting to give(35) a scientific account of motion, the purelymechanical view hardly suggested itself,except in the case of a few men of genius suchas Democritus and Archimedes. Two sets ofphenomena seemed important: the movements(40) of animals, and the movements of the heavenlybodies. To the modern man of science, the bodyof an animal is a very elaborate machine, withan enormously complex physical and chemicalstructure. Every new discovery consists in(45) diminishing the apparent gulf between animalsand machines. To the Greek, it seemed morenatural to assimilate apparently lifeless motionsto those of animals. A child still distinguishes liveanimals from other things by the fact that animals(50) can move themselves. To many Greeks, andespecially to Aristotle, this peculiarity suggesteditself as the basis of a general theory of physics.But how about the heavenly bodies? Theydiffer from animals by the regularity of their(55) movements, but this may be only due to theirsuperior perfection. Every Greek philosopher,whatever he may have come to think in adult life,had been taught in childhood to regard the sunand moon as gods. Anaxagoras was prosecuted(60) for impiety because he thought that they werenot alive. It was natural that a philosopher whocould no longer regard the heavenly bodiesthemselves as divine should think of them asmoved by the will of a Divine Being who had a(65) Hellenic love of order and geometric simplicity.Thus the ultimate source of all movement isWill: on earth the capricious Will of humanbeings, but in heaven the unchanging Will of theSupreme Artificer.Q.The passage as a whole primarily serves to

View answer

Question based on the following passage.This passage is adapted from Bertrand Russell, A History of Western Philosophy. ©1945 by Bertrand Russell, renewed by Edith Russell. Reprinted with permission of Simon & Schuster.To understand the views of Aristotle, as of mostGreeks, on physics, it is necessary to apprehendhis imaginative background. Every philosopher,in addition to the formal system that he offers to(5) the world, has another much simpler system ofwhich he may be quite unaware. If he is aware ofit, he probably realizes that it wont quite do; hetherefore conceals it, and sets forth something moresophisticated, which he believes because it is like(10) his crude system, but which he asks others to acceptbecause he thinks he has made it such as cannotbe disproved. The sophistication comes in by wayof refutation of refutations, but this alone will nevergive a positive result. It shows, at best, that a theory(15) may be true, not that it must be. The positive result,however little the philosopher may realize it, isdue to his imaginative preconceptions, or to whatSantayana calls “animal faith.”In relation to physics, Aristotles imaginative(20) background was very different from that of amodern student. Nowadays, students begin withmechanics, which, by its very name, suggestsmachines. They are accustomed to automobilesand airplanes; they do not, even in the dimmest(25) recesses of their subconscious imagination,think that an automobile contains some sort ofhorse inside, or that an airplane flies becauseits wings are those of a bird possessing magicalpowers. Animals have lost their importance in(30) our imaginative pictures of the world, in whichhumans stand comparatively alone as masters ofa mainly lifeless and largely subservient materialenvironment.To the ancient Greek, attempting to give(35) a scientific account of motion, the purelymechanical view hardly suggested itself,except in the case of a few men of genius suchas Democritus and Archimedes. Two sets ofphenomena seemed important: the movements(40) of animals, and the movements of the heavenlybodies. To the modern man of science, the bodyof an animal is a very elaborate machine, withan enormously complex physical and chemicalstructure. Every new discovery consists in(45) diminishing the apparent gulf between animalsand machines. To the Greek, it seemed morenatural to assimilate apparently lifeless motionsto those of animals. A child still distinguishes liveanimals from other things by the fact that animals(50) can move themselves. To many Greeks, andespecially to Aristotle, this peculiarity suggesteditself as the basis of a general theory of physics.But how about the heavenly bodies? Theydiffer from animals by the regularity of their(55) movements, but this may be only due to theirsuperior perfection. Every Greek philosopher,whatever he may have come to think in adult life,had been taught in childhood to regard the sunand moon as gods. Anaxagoras was prosecuted(60) for impiety because he thought that they werenot alive. It was natural that a philosopher whocould no longer regard the heavenly bodiesthemselves as divine should think of them asmoved by the will of a Divine Being who had a(65) Hellenic love of order and geometric simplicity.Thus the ultimate source of all movement isWill: on earth the capricious Will of humanbeings, but in heaven the unchanging Will of theSupreme Artificer.Q.Which of the following would best bridge the “gulf” in line 45?

View answer

Question based on the following passage.This passage is adapted from Bertrand Russell, A History of Western Philosophy. ©1945 by Bertrand Russell, renewed by Edith Russell. Reprinted with permission of Simon & Schuster.To understand the views of Aristotle, as of mostGreeks, on physics, it is necessary to apprehendhis imaginative background. Every philosopher,in addition to the formal system that he offers to(5) the world, has another much simpler system ofwhich he may be quite unaware. If he is aware ofit, he probably realizes that it wont quite do; hetherefore conceals it, and sets forth something moresophisticated, which he believes because it is like(10) his crude system, but which he asks others to acceptbecause he thinks he has made it such as cannotbe disproved. The sophistication comes in by wayof refutation of refutations, but this alone will nevergive a positive result. It shows, at best, that a theory(15) may be true, not that it must be. The positive result,however little the philosopher may realize it, isdue to his imaginative preconceptions, or to whatSantayana calls “animal faith.”In relation to physics, Aristotles imaginative(20) background was very different from that of amodern student. Nowadays, students begin withmechanics, which, by its very name, suggestsmachines. They are accustomed to automobilesand airplanes; they do not, even in the dimmest(25) recesses of their subconscious imagination,think that an automobile contains some sort ofhorse inside, or that an airplane flies becauseits wings are those of a bird possessing magicalpowers. Animals have lost their importance in(30) our imaginative pictures of the world, in whichhumans stand comparatively alone as masters ofa mainly lifeless and largely subservient materialenvironment.To the ancient Greek, attempting to give(35) a scientific account of motion, the purelymechanical view hardly suggested itself,except in the case of a few men of genius suchas Democritus and Archimedes. Two sets ofphenomena seemed important: the movements(40) of animals, and the movements of the heavenlybodies. To the modern man of science, the bodyof an animal is a very elaborate machine, withan enormously complex physical and chemicalstructure. Every new discovery consists in(45) diminishing the apparent gulf between animalsand machines. To the Greek, it seemed morenatural to assimilate apparently lifeless motionsto those of animals. A child still distinguishes liveanimals from other things by the fact that animals(50) can move themselves. To many Greeks, andespecially to Aristotle, this peculiarity suggesteditself as the basis of a general theory of physics.But how about the heavenly bodies? Theydiffer from animals by the regularity of their(55) movements, but this may be only due to theirsuperior perfection. Every Greek philosopher,whatever he may have come to think in adult life,had been taught in childhood to regard the sunand moon as gods. Anaxagoras was prosecuted(60) for impiety because he thought that they werenot alive. It was natural that a philosopher whocould no longer regard the heavenly bodiesthemselves as divine should think of them asmoved by the will of a Divine Being who had a(65) Hellenic love of order and geometric simplicity.Thus the ultimate source of all movement isWill: on earth the capricious Will of humanbeings, but in heaven the unchanging Will of theSupreme Artificer.Q.Which sentence provides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question?

View answer

Top Courses for SATView all

SAT Mock Test Series 2025

Mathematics for Digital SAT

Crash Course for Digital SAT

Reading and Writing for Digital SAT

Digital SAT Preparation Tutorials: Important Questions & Tricks

Top Courses for SAT

View all

Works of moral philosophy, such as Platos Republic or Aristotles Nicomachean Ethics, are partly concerned with how to live a morally good life. But philosopher Jonathan Barnes argues that works that present a method of living such a life without also supplying a motive are inherently useful only to those already wishing to be morally good—those with no desire for moral goodness will not choose to follow their rules. However, some works of moral philosophy attempt to describe what constitutes a morally good life while also proposing reasons for living one.Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?a)It mentions two renowned works and then claims that despite their popularity it is impossible for these works to serve the purpose their authors intended.b)It summarizes the history of a field of thought by discussing two works and then proposes a topic of further research for specialists in that field.c)It describes two influential works and then explains why one is more widely read than the other.d)It provides a characterization about a field of thought by noting two works in it and then details a way in which some works in that field are more comprehensive than others.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Works of moral philosophy, such as Platos Republic or Aristotles Nicomachean Ethics, are partly concerned with how to live a morally good life. But philosopher Jonathan Barnes argues that works that present a method of living such a life without also supplying a motive are inherently useful only to those already wishing to be morally good—those with no desire for moral goodness will not choose to follow their rules. However, some works of moral philosophy attempt to describe what constitutes a morally good life while also proposing reasons for living one.Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?a)It mentions two renowned works and then claims that despite their popularity it is impossible for these works to serve the purpose their authors intended.b)It summarizes the history of a field of thought by discussing two works and then proposes a topic of further research for specialists in that field.c)It describes two influential works and then explains why one is more widely read than the other.d)It provides a characterization about a field of thought by noting two works in it and then details a way in which some works in that field are more comprehensive than others.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for SAT 2025 is part of SAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the SAT exam syllabus. Information about Works of moral philosophy, such as Platos Republic or Aristotles Nicomachean Ethics, are partly concerned with how to live a morally good life. But philosopher Jonathan Barnes argues that works that present a method of living such a life without also supplying a motive are inherently useful only to those already wishing to be morally good—those with no desire for moral goodness will not choose to follow their rules. However, some works of moral philosophy attempt to describe what constitutes a morally good life while also proposing reasons for living one.Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?a)It mentions two renowned works and then claims that despite their popularity it is impossible for these works to serve the purpose their authors intended.b)It summarizes the history of a field of thought by discussing two works and then proposes a topic of further research for specialists in that field.c)It describes two influential works and then explains why one is more widely read than the other.d)It provides a characterization about a field of thought by noting two works in it and then details a way in which some works in that field are more comprehensive than others.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for SAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Works of moral philosophy, such as Platos Republic or Aristotles Nicomachean Ethics, are partly concerned with how to live a morally good life. But philosopher Jonathan Barnes argues that works that present a method of living such a life without also supplying a motive are inherently useful only to those already wishing to be morally good—those with no desire for moral goodness will not choose to follow their rules. However, some works of moral philosophy attempt to describe what constitutes a morally good life while also proposing reasons for living one.Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?a)It mentions two renowned works and then claims that despite their popularity it is impossible for these works to serve the purpose their authors intended.b)It summarizes the history of a field of thought by discussing two works and then proposes a topic of further research for specialists in that field.c)It describes two influential works and then explains why one is more widely read than the other.d)It provides a characterization about a field of thought by noting two works in it and then details a way in which some works in that field are more comprehensive than others.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Works of moral philosophy, such as Platos Republic or Aristotles Nicomachean Ethics, are partly concerned with how to live a morally good life. But philosopher Jonathan Barnes argues that works that present a method of living such a life without also supplying a motive are inherently useful only to those already wishing to be morally good—those with no desire for moral goodness will not choose to follow their rules. However, some works of moral philosophy attempt to describe what constitutes a morally good life while also proposing reasons for living one.Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?a)It mentions two renowned works and then claims that despite their popularity it is impossible for these works to serve the purpose their authors intended.b)It summarizes the history of a field of thought by discussing two works and then proposes a topic of further research for specialists in that field.c)It describes two influential works and then explains why one is more widely read than the other.d)It provides a characterization about a field of thought by noting two works in it and then details a way in which some works in that field are more comprehensive than others.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for SAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for SAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Works of moral philosophy, such as Platos Republic or Aristotles Nicomachean Ethics, are partly concerned with how to live a morally good life. But philosopher Jonathan Barnes argues that works that present a method of living such a life without also supplying a motive are inherently useful only to those already wishing to be morally good—those with no desire for moral goodness will not choose to follow their rules. However, some works of moral philosophy attempt to describe what constitutes a morally good life while also proposing reasons for living one.Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?a)It mentions two renowned works and then claims that despite their popularity it is impossible for these works to serve the purpose their authors intended.b)It summarizes the history of a field of thought by discussing two works and then proposes a topic of further research for specialists in that field.c)It describes two influential works and then explains why one is more widely read than the other.d)It provides a characterization about a field of thought by noting two works in it and then details a way in which some works in that field are more comprehensive than others.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Works of moral philosophy, such as Platos Republic or Aristotles Nicomachean Ethics, are partly concerned with how to live a morally good life. But philosopher Jonathan Barnes argues that works that present a method of living such a life without also supplying a motive are inherently useful only to those already wishing to be morally good—those with no desire for moral goodness will not choose to follow their rules. However, some works of moral philosophy attempt to describe what constitutes a morally good life while also proposing reasons for living one.Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?a)It mentions two renowned works and then claims that despite their popularity it is impossible for these works to serve the purpose their authors intended.b)It summarizes the history of a field of thought by discussing two works and then proposes a topic of further research for specialists in that field.c)It describes two influential works and then explains why one is more widely read than the other.d)It provides a characterization about a field of thought by noting two works in it and then details a way in which some works in that field are more comprehensive than others.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Works of moral philosophy, such as Platos Republic or Aristotles Nicomachean Ethics, are partly concerned with how to live a morally good life. But philosopher Jonathan Barnes argues that works that present a method of living such a life without also supplying a motive are inherently useful only to those already wishing to be morally good—those with no desire for moral goodness will not choose to follow their rules. However, some works of moral philosophy attempt to describe what constitutes a morally good life while also proposing reasons for living one.Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?a)It mentions two renowned works and then claims that despite their popularity it is impossible for these works to serve the purpose their authors intended.b)It summarizes the history of a field of thought by discussing two works and then proposes a topic of further research for specialists in that field.c)It describes two influential works and then explains why one is more widely read than the other.d)It provides a characterization about a field of thought by noting two works in it and then details a way in which some works in that field are more comprehensive than others.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Works of moral philosophy, such as Platos Republic or Aristotles Nicomachean Ethics, are partly concerned with how to live a morally good life. But philosopher Jonathan Barnes argues that works that present a method of living such a life without also supplying a motive are inherently useful only to those already wishing to be morally good—those with no desire for moral goodness will not choose to follow their rules. However, some works of moral philosophy attempt to describe what constitutes a morally good life while also proposing reasons for living one.Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?a)It mentions two renowned works and then claims that despite their popularity it is impossible for these works to serve the purpose their authors intended.b)It summarizes the history of a field of thought by discussing two works and then proposes a topic of further research for specialists in that field.c)It describes two influential works and then explains why one is more widely read than the other.d)It provides a characterization about a field of thought by noting two works in it and then details a way in which some works in that field are more comprehensive than others.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Works of moral philosophy, such as Platos Republic or Aristotles Nicomachean Ethics, are partly concerned with how to live a morally good life. But philosopher Jonathan Barnes argues that works that present a method of living such a life without also supplying a motive are inherently useful only to those already wishing to be morally good—those with no desire for moral goodness will not choose to follow their rules. However, some works of moral philosophy attempt to describe what constitutes a morally good life while also proposing reasons for living one.Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?a)It mentions two renowned works and then claims that despite their popularity it is impossible for these works to serve the purpose their authors intended.b)It summarizes the history of a field of thought by discussing two works and then proposes a topic of further research for specialists in that field.c)It describes two influential works and then explains why one is more widely read than the other.d)It provides a characterization about a field of thought by noting two works in it and then details a way in which some works in that field are more comprehensive than others.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice SAT tests.

Explore Courses for SAT exam