SAT Exam  >  SAT Questions  >  Stephen Hannocks luminous landscape paintings... Start Learning for Free
Stephen Hannock's luminous landscape paintings are appealing to viewers but have elicited little commentary from contemporary critics, a phenomenon that may be due to the very fact that the paintings seem so ______. Many critics focus their attention on art that is cryptic or overtly challenging.
Which choice completes the text with the most logical and precise word or phrase?
  • a)
    innovative
  • b)
    accessible
  • c)
    profound
  • d)
    subversive
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Stephen Hannocks luminous landscape paintings are appealing to viewers...
Choice A. This doesn't fit the logic of the text. The next sentence tells us that critics focus on art that is mysterious and challenging. If Hannock's paintings are "innovative" (meaning advanced and original), then critics probably would comment on them.
Choice B. This is the best choice. When talking about a thing, "accessible" means "easy to understand". This sets up the contrast in the next sentence, which tells us that critics mostly focus on art that is "cryptic or challenging" (meaning not easy to understand).
Choice C. This doesn't fit the logic of the text. The next sentence tells us that critics focus on art that is mysterious and challenging. If Hannock's paintings are "profound" (meaning very deep and insightful), then critics probably would comment on them.
Choice D. This doesn't fit the logic of the text. The next sentence tells us that critics focus on art that is mysterious and challenging. If Hannock's paintings are "subversive" (meaning disruptive and revolutionary), then critics probably would comment on them.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Stephen Hannocks luminous landscape paintings are appealing to viewers...
b) accessible

- The word "accessible" means easy to approach, reach, enter, or use. In the context of the sentence, it suggests that Hannocks' paintings are easily understood and enjoyed by viewers without requiring deep analysis or interpretation.
- Contemporary critics often gravitate towards art that is more challenging or obscure, as it gives them more material to analyze and discuss.
- Since Hannocks' paintings are visually striking and immediately captivating, they may not prompt critics to delve deeper or provide commentary that goes beyond their initial beauty.
- Therefore, the lack of commentary from contemporary critics on Hannocks' luminous landscape paintings can be attributed to their accessibility, as they do not present a significant intellectual or interpretive challenge.
Explore Courses for SAT exam

Similar SAT Doubts

Question based on the following passage.This passage is adapted from Stephen T. Asma,“Animal Spirits." ©2013 Stephen T. Asma. Originally published in Aeon (aeon.co), February 6, 2013. In this article, Asma describes a visit to the Serengeti plains of Africa and reflects on human and animal emotions.Time on the Serengeti makes you thinka lot about the inner life of animals. When awildebeest is screaming in the jaws of a crocodile,is it feeling fear like we do? Is it relieved when its(5) suddenly free? Is the croc filled with regret? JaakPanksepp, the founder of the new field of affectiveneuroscience, says animals do in fact havecomplex emotional lives.When he administered an electrical charge(10) to the medial hypothalamus of a cat, it leapedviciously, a hissing, spitting tangle of fangs andclaws. As soon as he turned off the stimulation,the cat relaxed. Humans who have had electricalstimulation in the corresponding brain locations(15) also reported intense rage, which lends credenceto the idea of animal subjectivity. Scientists whostudy animal behavior increasingly accept theidea that fear keeps animals away from predators,lust draws them toward each other, panic(20) motivates their social solidarity, and care gluestheir parent-offspring bonds. Just like us, theyhave an inner life because it helps them navigatetheir outer life.Since the Pleistocene epoch, we hominids(25) have had to feel before we could think. Ourcognitive brains work only when emotionstilt our deliberations. Neuroscientist AntonioDamasio studied patients with damage in thecommunication system between the cognitive(30) and emotional brain. The subjects could computeall the informational aspects of a decision,but couldnt commit. Without clear feelings,Damasios patients couldnt decide their ownsocial calendars or make decisions in their own(35) best interest. In order for our minds to go beyondsyntax to semantics, we need feelings. And ourancestral minds were rich in feelings before theywere adept in computations.In those early days, our lives were dominated(40) by survival-related experiences that stimulatedour limbic system, the part of our brain hard-wired for parent-child bonding, panic, rage,anxiety, loneliness, and play. But the process bywhich we attach fear, anger, and desire to the(45) right kinds of creatures in our environmentsturns out to be quite flexible. Humans areafraid of the dark, but rats—our more distantmammal kin—are afraid of the light. Its the sameemotional system, assigned to different settings(50) thanks to neuroplasticity.Discoveries about this flexibility arechanging the game in contemporary theories ofmind. Until recently, evolutionary psychologistscharacterized the mind as a collection of(55) independent problem-solving modules, likeseparate gears in a watch. Each of these modules,they argued, was sculpted by natural selectionduring the Pleistocene to solve a specific survivalchallenge; we now inherit them in toto as part of(60) our genetic birthright.A vital premise for this modular theory isthat the hominid brain evolved in an extremelystable environment, or else natural selectioncouldnt sculpt each module to fit our perennial(65) environmental challenges. But recent discoveriesshow that the Pleistocene environment wasanything but stable. In fact, it was precisely thisclimate chaos that created our multipurpose,problem-solving minds. If the context in which(70) we did our foraging and hunting kept changingradically, hardwired specialized moduleswouldnt have done us much good. What weneeded was all-purpose intelligence that couldperceive new challenges and apply general logical(75) rules and cultural folkways to solving them.The expansion of the brain corresponds with anincreasingly adaptable mind.That flexibility probably evolved inthe context of more complex social groups.(80) Hominids, following a preexisting trajectoryamong primates, continued down the path oflonger childhoods and greater dependenceon our mothers. Eventually, this led to somethingnew: the capacity to care beyond our narrow(85) biological circles. We could spread our feelingsaround promiscuously, extending them to ourfellow humans in general and sustaining loyaltiesover great expanses of time. By comparison, otheranimals seem strictly concerned with specific(90) threats and benefactors.Africa has long been used as a kind of literarymetaphor, a geography of the animal instinct.Affective neuroscience, however, is turning age-old mysteries of the animal instinct into scientific(95) research programs. We need more scientists whoare willing to bridge the chasm between the newbrain science of emotions and the natural historyof life on the African savanna. Limbic emotionsgave our ancestors their world of friends and(100) foes, their grasp of food and its fatal alternatives.These emotions also motivated much of the socialbonding that spurred the sapiens great leapforward. If we are to understand ourselves, this isthe wild territory we need to rediscover.Q.The main purpose of the sixth paragraph (lines 61–77) is to

Question based on the following passage and supplementary material.This passage is adapted from Brian Greene, “How the Higgs Boson Was Found.” ©2013 by Smithsonian Institution. The Higgs boson is an elementary particle associated with the Higgs field. Experiments conducted in 2012–2013 tentatively confirmed the existence of the Higgs boson and thus of the Higgs field.Nearly a half-century ago, Peter Higgs and ahandful of other physicists were trying to understandthe origin of a basic physical feature: mass. You canthink of mass as an object’s heft or, a little more(5) precisely, as the resistance it offers to having itsmotion changed. Push on a freight train (or afeather) to increase its speed, and the resistance youfeel reflects its mass. At a microscopic level, thefreight train’s mass comes from its constituent(10) molecules and atoms, which are themselves builtfrom fundamental particles, electrons and quarks.But where do the masses of these and otherfundamental particles come from?When physicists in the 1960s modeled the(15) behavior of these particles using equations rooted inquantum physics, they encountered a puzzle. If theyimagined that the particles were all massless, theneach term in the equations clicked into a perfectlysymmetric pattern, like the tips of a perfect(20) snowflake. And this symmetry was not justmathematically elegant. It explained patterns evidentin the experimental data. But—and here’s thepuzzle—physicists knew that the particles did havemass, and when they modified the equations to(25) account for this fact, the mathematical harmony wasspoiled. The equations became complex andunwieldy and, worse still, inconsistent.What to do? Here’s the idea put forward by Higgs.Don’t shove the particles’ masses down the throat of(30) the beautiful equations. Instead, keep the equationspristine and symmetric, but consider them operatingwithin a peculiar environment. Imagine that all ofspace is uniformly filled with an invisiblesubstance—now called the Higgs field—that exerts a(35) drag force on particles when they accelerate throughit. Push on a fundamental particle in an effort toincrease its speed and, according to Higgs, you wouldfeel this drag force as a resistance. Justifiably, youwould interpret the resistance as the particle’s mass.(40) For a mental toehold, think of a ping-pong ballsubmerged in water. When you push on theping-pong ball, it will feel much more massive than itdoes outside of water. Its interaction with the wateryenvironment has the effect of endowing it with mass.(45) So with particles submerged in the Higgs field.In 1964, Higgs submitted a paper to a prominentphysics journal in which he formulated this ideamathematically. The paper was rejected. Not becauseit contained a technical error, but because the(50) premise of an invisible something permeating space,interacting with particles to provide their mass, well,it all just seemed like heaps of overwroughtspeculation. The editors of the journal deemed it “ofno obvious relevance to physics.”(55) But Higgs persevered (and his revised paperappeared later that year in another journal), andphysicists who took the time to study the proposalgradually realized that his idea was a stroke of genius,one that allowed them to have their cake and eat it(60) too. In Higgs’s scheme, the fundamental equationscan retain their pristine form because the dirty workof providing the particles’ masses is relegated to theenvironment.While I wasn’t around to witness the initial(65) rejection of Higgs’s proposal in 1964 (well, I wasaround, but only barely), I can attest that by themid-1980s, the assessment had changed. The physicscommunity had, for the most part, fully bought intothe idea that there was a Higgs field permeating(70) space. In fact, in a graduate course I took thatcovered what’s known as the Standard Model ofParticle Physics (the quantum equations physicistshave assembled to describe the particles of matterand the dominant forces by which they influence(75) each other), the professor presented the Higgs fieldwith such certainty that for a long while I had no ideait had yet to be established experimentally.On occasion, that happens in physics. Mathematicalequations can sometimes tell such a convincing tale,(80) they can seemingly radiate reality so strongly, thatthey become entrenched in the vernacular ofworking physicists, even before there’s data toconfirm them.Q.The author notes that one reason Higgs’s theory gained acceptance was that it

Stephen Hannocks luminous landscape paintings are appealing to viewers but have elicited little commentary from contemporary critics, a phenomenon that may be due to the very fact that the paintings seem so ______. Many critics focus their attention on art that is cryptic or overtly challenging.Which choice completes the text with the most logical and precise word or phrase?a)innovativeb)accessiblec)profoundd)subversiveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Stephen Hannocks luminous landscape paintings are appealing to viewers but have elicited little commentary from contemporary critics, a phenomenon that may be due to the very fact that the paintings seem so ______. Many critics focus their attention on art that is cryptic or overtly challenging.Which choice completes the text with the most logical and precise word or phrase?a)innovativeb)accessiblec)profoundd)subversiveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for SAT 2025 is part of SAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the SAT exam syllabus. Information about Stephen Hannocks luminous landscape paintings are appealing to viewers but have elicited little commentary from contemporary critics, a phenomenon that may be due to the very fact that the paintings seem so ______. Many critics focus their attention on art that is cryptic or overtly challenging.Which choice completes the text with the most logical and precise word or phrase?a)innovativeb)accessiblec)profoundd)subversiveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for SAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Stephen Hannocks luminous landscape paintings are appealing to viewers but have elicited little commentary from contemporary critics, a phenomenon that may be due to the very fact that the paintings seem so ______. Many critics focus their attention on art that is cryptic or overtly challenging.Which choice completes the text with the most logical and precise word or phrase?a)innovativeb)accessiblec)profoundd)subversiveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Stephen Hannocks luminous landscape paintings are appealing to viewers but have elicited little commentary from contemporary critics, a phenomenon that may be due to the very fact that the paintings seem so ______. Many critics focus their attention on art that is cryptic or overtly challenging.Which choice completes the text with the most logical and precise word or phrase?a)innovativeb)accessiblec)profoundd)subversiveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for SAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for SAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Stephen Hannocks luminous landscape paintings are appealing to viewers but have elicited little commentary from contemporary critics, a phenomenon that may be due to the very fact that the paintings seem so ______. Many critics focus their attention on art that is cryptic or overtly challenging.Which choice completes the text with the most logical and precise word or phrase?a)innovativeb)accessiblec)profoundd)subversiveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Stephen Hannocks luminous landscape paintings are appealing to viewers but have elicited little commentary from contemporary critics, a phenomenon that may be due to the very fact that the paintings seem so ______. Many critics focus their attention on art that is cryptic or overtly challenging.Which choice completes the text with the most logical and precise word or phrase?a)innovativeb)accessiblec)profoundd)subversiveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Stephen Hannocks luminous landscape paintings are appealing to viewers but have elicited little commentary from contemporary critics, a phenomenon that may be due to the very fact that the paintings seem so ______. Many critics focus their attention on art that is cryptic or overtly challenging.Which choice completes the text with the most logical and precise word or phrase?a)innovativeb)accessiblec)profoundd)subversiveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Stephen Hannocks luminous landscape paintings are appealing to viewers but have elicited little commentary from contemporary critics, a phenomenon that may be due to the very fact that the paintings seem so ______. Many critics focus their attention on art that is cryptic or overtly challenging.Which choice completes the text with the most logical and precise word or phrase?a)innovativeb)accessiblec)profoundd)subversiveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Stephen Hannocks luminous landscape paintings are appealing to viewers but have elicited little commentary from contemporary critics, a phenomenon that may be due to the very fact that the paintings seem so ______. Many critics focus their attention on art that is cryptic or overtly challenging.Which choice completes the text with the most logical and precise word or phrase?a)innovativeb)accessiblec)profoundd)subversiveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice SAT tests.
Explore Courses for SAT exam

Top Courses for SAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev