Question Description
Before modern technologies and experiments allowed scientists to understand different organisms mechanisms of reproduction, numerous theories existed about how populations came to exist. Two scientists from the 1800s describe their theories. Here are their arguments.Scientist IJust like some plants come from seeds and others are capable of vegetative (asexual) reproduction, some animal organisms come from non-sexual reproduction as well. Maggots, for example, appear on rotting carcasses. It is clearly illogical to suggest that the dead animal created or gave birth to the maggots, as it is no longer alive and is therefore incapable of sexual reproduction. The only rational conclusion for the appearance of maggots is a spontaneous generation. This is similar to how, if one were to leave a bowl of broth in the open air for a week, it would turn cloudy from bacteria appearing in the liquid.Scientist IIAnimate objects cannot arise from inanimate objects. Even when plants perform asexual reproduction, daughter plants are still coming from parent plants. There is no other example in nature of a living organism spontaneously coming into being. It is true that we observe maggots on rotting carcasses, but that does not necessarily mean that the maggots came from the rotting carcass. Similarly, bacteria growing in broth do not necessarily come directly from the broth. If a living organism appears, then it must have come from another animate object, even if we did not witness it. It is more likely that these invisible organisms have come in through the air and we simply do not see them until they have had a chance to replicate in these locations.Which of the following is a valid summary of Scientist IIs argument against Scientist I?a)Not all plants come from seedsb)Just because we did not see an event occur does not mean it did not happenc)There is insufficient experimental evidence to prove spontaneous generationd)Maggots do not appear on rotting carcassesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for ACT 2025 is part of ACT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the ACT exam syllabus. Information about Before modern technologies and experiments allowed scientists to understand different organisms mechanisms of reproduction, numerous theories existed about how populations came to exist. Two scientists from the 1800s describe their theories. Here are their arguments.Scientist IJust like some plants come from seeds and others are capable of vegetative (asexual) reproduction, some animal organisms come from non-sexual reproduction as well. Maggots, for example, appear on rotting carcasses. It is clearly illogical to suggest that the dead animal created or gave birth to the maggots, as it is no longer alive and is therefore incapable of sexual reproduction. The only rational conclusion for the appearance of maggots is a spontaneous generation. This is similar to how, if one were to leave a bowl of broth in the open air for a week, it would turn cloudy from bacteria appearing in the liquid.Scientist IIAnimate objects cannot arise from inanimate objects. Even when plants perform asexual reproduction, daughter plants are still coming from parent plants. There is no other example in nature of a living organism spontaneously coming into being. It is true that we observe maggots on rotting carcasses, but that does not necessarily mean that the maggots came from the rotting carcass. Similarly, bacteria growing in broth do not necessarily come directly from the broth. If a living organism appears, then it must have come from another animate object, even if we did not witness it. It is more likely that these invisible organisms have come in through the air and we simply do not see them until they have had a chance to replicate in these locations.Which of the following is a valid summary of Scientist IIs argument against Scientist I?a)Not all plants come from seedsb)Just because we did not see an event occur does not mean it did not happenc)There is insufficient experimental evidence to prove spontaneous generationd)Maggots do not appear on rotting carcassesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for ACT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Before modern technologies and experiments allowed scientists to understand different organisms mechanisms of reproduction, numerous theories existed about how populations came to exist. Two scientists from the 1800s describe their theories. Here are their arguments.Scientist IJust like some plants come from seeds and others are capable of vegetative (asexual) reproduction, some animal organisms come from non-sexual reproduction as well. Maggots, for example, appear on rotting carcasses. It is clearly illogical to suggest that the dead animal created or gave birth to the maggots, as it is no longer alive and is therefore incapable of sexual reproduction. The only rational conclusion for the appearance of maggots is a spontaneous generation. This is similar to how, if one were to leave a bowl of broth in the open air for a week, it would turn cloudy from bacteria appearing in the liquid.Scientist IIAnimate objects cannot arise from inanimate objects. Even when plants perform asexual reproduction, daughter plants are still coming from parent plants. There is no other example in nature of a living organism spontaneously coming into being. It is true that we observe maggots on rotting carcasses, but that does not necessarily mean that the maggots came from the rotting carcass. Similarly, bacteria growing in broth do not necessarily come directly from the broth. If a living organism appears, then it must have come from another animate object, even if we did not witness it. It is more likely that these invisible organisms have come in through the air and we simply do not see them until they have had a chance to replicate in these locations.Which of the following is a valid summary of Scientist IIs argument against Scientist I?a)Not all plants come from seedsb)Just because we did not see an event occur does not mean it did not happenc)There is insufficient experimental evidence to prove spontaneous generationd)Maggots do not appear on rotting carcassesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Before modern technologies and experiments allowed scientists to understand different organisms mechanisms of reproduction, numerous theories existed about how populations came to exist. Two scientists from the 1800s describe their theories. Here are their arguments.Scientist IJust like some plants come from seeds and others are capable of vegetative (asexual) reproduction, some animal organisms come from non-sexual reproduction as well. Maggots, for example, appear on rotting carcasses. It is clearly illogical to suggest that the dead animal created or gave birth to the maggots, as it is no longer alive and is therefore incapable of sexual reproduction. The only rational conclusion for the appearance of maggots is a spontaneous generation. This is similar to how, if one were to leave a bowl of broth in the open air for a week, it would turn cloudy from bacteria appearing in the liquid.Scientist IIAnimate objects cannot arise from inanimate objects. Even when plants perform asexual reproduction, daughter plants are still coming from parent plants. There is no other example in nature of a living organism spontaneously coming into being. It is true that we observe maggots on rotting carcasses, but that does not necessarily mean that the maggots came from the rotting carcass. Similarly, bacteria growing in broth do not necessarily come directly from the broth. If a living organism appears, then it must have come from another animate object, even if we did not witness it. It is more likely that these invisible organisms have come in through the air and we simply do not see them until they have had a chance to replicate in these locations.Which of the following is a valid summary of Scientist IIs argument against Scientist I?a)Not all plants come from seedsb)Just because we did not see an event occur does not mean it did not happenc)There is insufficient experimental evidence to prove spontaneous generationd)Maggots do not appear on rotting carcassesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for ACT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for ACT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Before modern technologies and experiments allowed scientists to understand different organisms mechanisms of reproduction, numerous theories existed about how populations came to exist. Two scientists from the 1800s describe their theories. Here are their arguments.Scientist IJust like some plants come from seeds and others are capable of vegetative (asexual) reproduction, some animal organisms come from non-sexual reproduction as well. Maggots, for example, appear on rotting carcasses. It is clearly illogical to suggest that the dead animal created or gave birth to the maggots, as it is no longer alive and is therefore incapable of sexual reproduction. The only rational conclusion for the appearance of maggots is a spontaneous generation. This is similar to how, if one were to leave a bowl of broth in the open air for a week, it would turn cloudy from bacteria appearing in the liquid.Scientist IIAnimate objects cannot arise from inanimate objects. Even when plants perform asexual reproduction, daughter plants are still coming from parent plants. There is no other example in nature of a living organism spontaneously coming into being. It is true that we observe maggots on rotting carcasses, but that does not necessarily mean that the maggots came from the rotting carcass. Similarly, bacteria growing in broth do not necessarily come directly from the broth. If a living organism appears, then it must have come from another animate object, even if we did not witness it. It is more likely that these invisible organisms have come in through the air and we simply do not see them until they have had a chance to replicate in these locations.Which of the following is a valid summary of Scientist IIs argument against Scientist I?a)Not all plants come from seedsb)Just because we did not see an event occur does not mean it did not happenc)There is insufficient experimental evidence to prove spontaneous generationd)Maggots do not appear on rotting carcassesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Before modern technologies and experiments allowed scientists to understand different organisms mechanisms of reproduction, numerous theories existed about how populations came to exist. Two scientists from the 1800s describe their theories. Here are their arguments.Scientist IJust like some plants come from seeds and others are capable of vegetative (asexual) reproduction, some animal organisms come from non-sexual reproduction as well. Maggots, for example, appear on rotting carcasses. It is clearly illogical to suggest that the dead animal created or gave birth to the maggots, as it is no longer alive and is therefore incapable of sexual reproduction. The only rational conclusion for the appearance of maggots is a spontaneous generation. This is similar to how, if one were to leave a bowl of broth in the open air for a week, it would turn cloudy from bacteria appearing in the liquid.Scientist IIAnimate objects cannot arise from inanimate objects. Even when plants perform asexual reproduction, daughter plants are still coming from parent plants. There is no other example in nature of a living organism spontaneously coming into being. It is true that we observe maggots on rotting carcasses, but that does not necessarily mean that the maggots came from the rotting carcass. Similarly, bacteria growing in broth do not necessarily come directly from the broth. If a living organism appears, then it must have come from another animate object, even if we did not witness it. It is more likely that these invisible organisms have come in through the air and we simply do not see them until they have had a chance to replicate in these locations.Which of the following is a valid summary of Scientist IIs argument against Scientist I?a)Not all plants come from seedsb)Just because we did not see an event occur does not mean it did not happenc)There is insufficient experimental evidence to prove spontaneous generationd)Maggots do not appear on rotting carcassesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Before modern technologies and experiments allowed scientists to understand different organisms mechanisms of reproduction, numerous theories existed about how populations came to exist. Two scientists from the 1800s describe their theories. Here are their arguments.Scientist IJust like some plants come from seeds and others are capable of vegetative (asexual) reproduction, some animal organisms come from non-sexual reproduction as well. Maggots, for example, appear on rotting carcasses. It is clearly illogical to suggest that the dead animal created or gave birth to the maggots, as it is no longer alive and is therefore incapable of sexual reproduction. The only rational conclusion for the appearance of maggots is a spontaneous generation. This is similar to how, if one were to leave a bowl of broth in the open air for a week, it would turn cloudy from bacteria appearing in the liquid.Scientist IIAnimate objects cannot arise from inanimate objects. Even when plants perform asexual reproduction, daughter plants are still coming from parent plants. There is no other example in nature of a living organism spontaneously coming into being. It is true that we observe maggots on rotting carcasses, but that does not necessarily mean that the maggots came from the rotting carcass. Similarly, bacteria growing in broth do not necessarily come directly from the broth. If a living organism appears, then it must have come from another animate object, even if we did not witness it. It is more likely that these invisible organisms have come in through the air and we simply do not see them until they have had a chance to replicate in these locations.Which of the following is a valid summary of Scientist IIs argument against Scientist I?a)Not all plants come from seedsb)Just because we did not see an event occur does not mean it did not happenc)There is insufficient experimental evidence to prove spontaneous generationd)Maggots do not appear on rotting carcassesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Before modern technologies and experiments allowed scientists to understand different organisms mechanisms of reproduction, numerous theories existed about how populations came to exist. Two scientists from the 1800s describe their theories. Here are their arguments.Scientist IJust like some plants come from seeds and others are capable of vegetative (asexual) reproduction, some animal organisms come from non-sexual reproduction as well. Maggots, for example, appear on rotting carcasses. It is clearly illogical to suggest that the dead animal created or gave birth to the maggots, as it is no longer alive and is therefore incapable of sexual reproduction. The only rational conclusion for the appearance of maggots is a spontaneous generation. This is similar to how, if one were to leave a bowl of broth in the open air for a week, it would turn cloudy from bacteria appearing in the liquid.Scientist IIAnimate objects cannot arise from inanimate objects. Even when plants perform asexual reproduction, daughter plants are still coming from parent plants. There is no other example in nature of a living organism spontaneously coming into being. It is true that we observe maggots on rotting carcasses, but that does not necessarily mean that the maggots came from the rotting carcass. Similarly, bacteria growing in broth do not necessarily come directly from the broth. If a living organism appears, then it must have come from another animate object, even if we did not witness it. It is more likely that these invisible organisms have come in through the air and we simply do not see them until they have had a chance to replicate in these locations.Which of the following is a valid summary of Scientist IIs argument against Scientist I?a)Not all plants come from seedsb)Just because we did not see an event occur does not mean it did not happenc)There is insufficient experimental evidence to prove spontaneous generationd)Maggots do not appear on rotting carcassesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Before modern technologies and experiments allowed scientists to understand different organisms mechanisms of reproduction, numerous theories existed about how populations came to exist. Two scientists from the 1800s describe their theories. Here are their arguments.Scientist IJust like some plants come from seeds and others are capable of vegetative (asexual) reproduction, some animal organisms come from non-sexual reproduction as well. Maggots, for example, appear on rotting carcasses. It is clearly illogical to suggest that the dead animal created or gave birth to the maggots, as it is no longer alive and is therefore incapable of sexual reproduction. The only rational conclusion for the appearance of maggots is a spontaneous generation. This is similar to how, if one were to leave a bowl of broth in the open air for a week, it would turn cloudy from bacteria appearing in the liquid.Scientist IIAnimate objects cannot arise from inanimate objects. Even when plants perform asexual reproduction, daughter plants are still coming from parent plants. There is no other example in nature of a living organism spontaneously coming into being. It is true that we observe maggots on rotting carcasses, but that does not necessarily mean that the maggots came from the rotting carcass. Similarly, bacteria growing in broth do not necessarily come directly from the broth. If a living organism appears, then it must have come from another animate object, even if we did not witness it. It is more likely that these invisible organisms have come in through the air and we simply do not see them until they have had a chance to replicate in these locations.Which of the following is a valid summary of Scientist IIs argument against Scientist I?a)Not all plants come from seedsb)Just because we did not see an event occur does not mean it did not happenc)There is insufficient experimental evidence to prove spontaneous generationd)Maggots do not appear on rotting carcassesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice ACT tests.