How is the concept of positive peace distinct from negative peace in the study of International Relations, and what real-world example best demonstrates this distinction?a)Negative peace refers to the absence of violent conflict, while positive peace involves the presence of social justice and equity. The ceasefire agreement in the Korean peninsula is an example of negative peace, whereas the socially-balanced welfare state models in Scandinavia demonstrate positive peace.b)Negative peace is about the lack of economic conflict, while positive peace is about the existence of economic prosperity. The economic prosperity enjoyed by nations like Qatar and Luxembourg represents positive peace.c)Positive peace refers to the presence of military power, while negative peace is about the absence of military power. The non-nuclear nations are an example of negative peace, whereas the nuclear-armed countries indicate a state of positive peace.d)Negative peace represents a lack of environmental crises, and positive peace reflects a pristine and balanced environment. Nations like Costa Rica and Bhutan, working towards carbon neutrality, exemplify positive peace.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

UGC NET Exam > UGC NET Questions > How is the concept of positive peace distinct...

Join the Discussion on the App

How is the concept of 'positive peace' distinct from 'negative peace' in the study of International Relations, and what real-world example best demonstrates this distinction?

a)
Negative peace refers to the absence of violent conflict, while positive peace involves the presence of social justice and equity. The ceasefire agreement in the Korean peninsula is an example of negative peace, whereas the socially-balanced welfare state models in Scandinavia demonstrate positive peace.
b)
Negative peace is about the lack of economic conflict, while positive peace is about the existence of economic prosperity. The economic prosperity enjoyed by nations like Qatar and Luxembourg represents positive peace.
c)
Positive peace refers to the presence of military power, while negative peace is about the absence of military power. The non-nuclear nations are an example of negative peace, whereas the nuclear-armed countries indicate a state of positive peace.
d)
Negative peace represents a lack of environmental crises, and positive peace reflects a pristine and balanced environment. Nations like Costa Rica and Bhutan, working towards carbon neutrality, exemplify positive peace.

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

UGC NET Paper 2 Political Science Full Test - 3

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

How is the concept of positive peace distinct from negative peace in t...

The concepts of negative and positive peace in the field of Conflict and Peace Studies in International Relations have different connotations. 'Negative peace' is characterized by the absence of violence or the absence of war.
It denotes situations where direct violence is not evident or no longer exists, but without necessarily solving the underlying reasons for the conflict.
On the other hand, 'positive peace' refers to a more comprehensive, long-term, and sustainable form of peace, characterized by the presence of justice, equity, and structures that support peace .
One of the classic real-world illustrations of 'negative peace' is the ongoing situation in the Korean peninsula. In this case, there is a noticeable absence of direct violent conflict due to the cease-fire agreement between North and South Korea.
This cessation of hostilities is what identifies the situation as a state of 'negative peace.' It's essential to note, however, that a long-term resolution to the contentious issues causing the conflict in the Korean peninsula is still elusive, underlining the 'negative' aspect in this peace scenario .
On the flip side, 'positive peace' is well-exemplified by the socially balanced welfare state models found in Scandinavian countries like Sweden, Denmark, and Norway.
These nations have designed their socio-political models to ensure not only an absence of violent conflict but also a robust presence of social justice, equality, and structures that support and sustain peace. They transparently and effectively address structural and social inequities and have systems in place to maintain peaceful social order, demonstrating 'positive peace.'

Answered by JKL Classes · View profile

Attention UGC NET Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UGC NET study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UGC NET.

UGC NET Mock Test Series 2024

UGC NET Past Year Papers

Crash Course for UGC NET Education

Mathematical Reasoning and Aptitude for UGC NET

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for UGC NET exam

Similar UGC NET Doubts

Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the following question:Heritage conservation practices improved worldwide after the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM) was established with UNESCO’s assistance in 1959. The inter-governmental organisation with 126 member states has done a commendable job by training more than 4,000 professionals, providing practice standards, and sharing technical expertise. In this golden jubilee year, as we acknowledge its key role in global conservation, an assessment of international practices would be meaningful to the Indian conservation movement. Consistent investment, rigorous attention, and dedicated research and dissemination are some of the positive lessons to imbibe. Countries such as Italy have demonstrated that prioritising heritage with significant budget provision pays. On the other hand, India, which is no less endowed in terms of cultural capital, has a long way to go. Surveys indicate that in addition to the 6,600 protected monuments, there are over 60,000 equally valuable heritage structures that await attention. Besides the small group in the service of Archaeological Survey of India, there are only about 150 trained conservation professionals. In order to overcome this severe shortage, the emphasis has been on setting up dedicated labs and training institutions. It would make much better sense for conservation to be made part of mainstream research and engineering institutes, as has been done in Europe.Increasing funding and building institutions are the relatively easy part. The real challenge is to redefine international approaches to address local contexts. Conservation cannot limit itself to enhancing the art-historical value of the heritage structures, which international charters perhaps overemphasise. The effort has to be broad-based: It must also serve as a means to improving the quality of life in the area where the heritage structures are located. The first task, therefore, is to integrate conservation efforts with sound development plans that take care of people living in the heritage vicinity. Unlike in western countries, many traditional building crafts survive in India, and conservation practices offer an avenue to support them. This has been acknowledged by the Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage charter for conservation but is yet to receive substantial state support. More strength for heritage conservation can be mobilised by aligning it with the green building movement. Heritage structures are essentially eco-friendly and conservation could become a vital part of the sustainable building practices campaign in future.Q.Which of the following statements best describe(s) the major challenge faced in the implementation of international conservation policies?

View answer

Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the following question:Heritage conservation practices improved worldwide after the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM) was established with UNESCO’s assistance in 1959. The inter-governmental organisation with 126 member states has done a commendable job by training more than 4,000 professionals, providing practice standards, and sharing technical expertise. In this golden jubilee year, as we acknowledge its key role in global conservation, an assessment of international practices would be meaningful to the Indian conservation movement. Consistent investment, rigorous attention, and dedicated research and dissemination are some of the positive lessons to imbibe. Countries such as Italy have demonstrated that prioritising heritage with significant budget provision pays. On the other hand, India, which is no less endowed in terms of cultural capital, has a long way to go. Surveys indicate that in addition to the 6,600 protected monuments, there are over 60,000 equally valuable heritage structures that await attention. Besides the small group in the service of Archaeological Survey of India, there are only about 150 trained conservation professionals. In order to overcome this severe shortage, the emphasis has been on setting up dedicated labs and training institutions. It would make much better sense for conservation to be made part of mainstream research and engineering institutes, as has been done in Europe.Increasing funding and building institutions are the relatively easy part. The real challenge is to redefine international approaches to address local contexts. Conservation cannot limit itself to enhancing the art-historical value of the heritage structures, which international charters perhaps overemphasise. The effort has to be broad-based: It must also serve as a means to improving the quality of life in the area where the heritage structures are located. The first task, therefore, is to integrate conservation efforts with sound development plans that take care of people living in the heritage vicinity. Unlike in western countries, many traditional building crafts survive in India, and conservation practices offer an avenue to support them. This has been acknowledged by the Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage charter for conservation but is yet to receive substantial state support. More strength for heritage conservation can be mobilised by aligning it with the green building movement. Heritage structures are essentially eco-friendly and conservation could become a vital part of the sustainable building practices campaign in future.Q.The inter-government organisation was appreciated because of

View answer

The external environment of an organization consists of the mega environment and the task environment. Which of the following statement(s) is/are true regarding the task environment of a firm?I. It includes components such as technological, economic, socio-cultural, and international influences.II. It consists of specific external elements such as customers and clients, competitors, suppliers, labor supply and government agencies, with which an organization interacts while conducting its business.III. As it depends largely on the products and services offered by the firm and its business location, it may vary from firm to firm.IV. While a firm may not be able to directly influence its task environment, it can certainly influence its mega environment.

View answer

In the field of Conflict and Peace Studies in International Relations, which of the following connects the concepts of state sovereignty, human and environmental security, and peaceful conflict resolution?

View answer

There are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (

View answer

Top Courses for UGC NETView all

UGC NET Mock Test Series 2024

UGC NET Past Year Papers

Crash Course for UGC NET Education

Mathematical Reasoning and Aptitude for UGC NET

Teaching Aptitude for Teaching Exam

Top Courses for UGC NET

View all

How is the concept of positive peace distinct from negative peace in the study of International Relations, and what real-world example best demonstrates this distinction?a)Negative peace refers to the absence of violent conflict, while positive peace involves the presence of social justice and equity. The ceasefire agreement in the Korean peninsula is an example of negative peace, whereas the socially-balanced welfare state models in Scandinavia demonstrate positive peace.b)Negative peace is about the lack of economic conflict, while positive peace is about the existence of economic prosperity. The economic prosperity enjoyed by nations like Qatar and Luxembourg represents positive peace.c)Positive peace refers to the presence of military power, while negative peace is about the absence of military power. The non-nuclear nations are an example of negative peace, whereas the nuclear-armed countries indicate a state of positive peace.d)Negative peace represents a lack of environmental crises, and positive peace reflects a pristine and balanced environment. Nations like Costa Rica and Bhutan, working towards carbon neutrality, exemplify positive peace.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
How is the concept of positive peace distinct from negative peace in the study of International Relations, and what real-world example best demonstrates this distinction?a)Negative peace refers to the absence of violent conflict, while positive peace involves the presence of social justice and equity. The ceasefire agreement in the Korean peninsula is an example of negative peace, whereas the socially-balanced welfare state models in Scandinavia demonstrate positive peace.b)Negative peace is about the lack of economic conflict, while positive peace is about the existence of economic prosperity. The economic prosperity enjoyed by nations like Qatar and Luxembourg represents positive peace.c)Positive peace refers to the presence of military power, while negative peace is about the absence of military power. The non-nuclear nations are an example of negative peace, whereas the nuclear-armed countries indicate a state of positive peace.d)Negative peace represents a lack of environmental crises, and positive peace reflects a pristine and balanced environment. Nations like Costa Rica and Bhutan, working towards carbon neutrality, exemplify positive peace.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for UGC NET 2024 is part of UGC NET preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UGC NET exam syllabus. Information about How is the concept of positive peace distinct from negative peace in the study of International Relations, and what real-world example best demonstrates this distinction?a)Negative peace refers to the absence of violent conflict, while positive peace involves the presence of social justice and equity. The ceasefire agreement in the Korean peninsula is an example of negative peace, whereas the socially-balanced welfare state models in Scandinavia demonstrate positive peace.b)Negative peace is about the lack of economic conflict, while positive peace is about the existence of economic prosperity. The economic prosperity enjoyed by nations like Qatar and Luxembourg represents positive peace.c)Positive peace refers to the presence of military power, while negative peace is about the absence of military power. The non-nuclear nations are an example of negative peace, whereas the nuclear-armed countries indicate a state of positive peace.d)Negative peace represents a lack of environmental crises, and positive peace reflects a pristine and balanced environment. Nations like Costa Rica and Bhutan, working towards carbon neutrality, exemplify positive peace.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UGC NET 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for How is the concept of positive peace distinct from negative peace in the study of International Relations, and what real-world example best demonstrates this distinction?a)Negative peace refers to the absence of violent conflict, while positive peace involves the presence of social justice and equity. The ceasefire agreement in the Korean peninsula is an example of negative peace, whereas the socially-balanced welfare state models in Scandinavia demonstrate positive peace.b)Negative peace is about the lack of economic conflict, while positive peace is about the existence of economic prosperity. The economic prosperity enjoyed by nations like Qatar and Luxembourg represents positive peace.c)Positive peace refers to the presence of military power, while negative peace is about the absence of military power. The non-nuclear nations are an example of negative peace, whereas the nuclear-armed countries indicate a state of positive peace.d)Negative peace represents a lack of environmental crises, and positive peace reflects a pristine and balanced environment. Nations like Costa Rica and Bhutan, working towards carbon neutrality, exemplify positive peace.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for How is the concept of positive peace distinct from negative peace in the study of International Relations, and what real-world example best demonstrates this distinction?a)Negative peace refers to the absence of violent conflict, while positive peace involves the presence of social justice and equity. The ceasefire agreement in the Korean peninsula is an example of negative peace, whereas the socially-balanced welfare state models in Scandinavia demonstrate positive peace.b)Negative peace is about the lack of economic conflict, while positive peace is about the existence of economic prosperity. The economic prosperity enjoyed by nations like Qatar and Luxembourg represents positive peace.c)Positive peace refers to the presence of military power, while negative peace is about the absence of military power. The non-nuclear nations are an example of negative peace, whereas the nuclear-armed countries indicate a state of positive peace.d)Negative peace represents a lack of environmental crises, and positive peace reflects a pristine and balanced environment. Nations like Costa Rica and Bhutan, working towards carbon neutrality, exemplify positive peace.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UGC NET. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UGC NET Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of How is the concept of positive peace distinct from negative peace in the study of International Relations, and what real-world example best demonstrates this distinction?a)Negative peace refers to the absence of violent conflict, while positive peace involves the presence of social justice and equity. The ceasefire agreement in the Korean peninsula is an example of negative peace, whereas the socially-balanced welfare state models in Scandinavia demonstrate positive peace.b)Negative peace is about the lack of economic conflict, while positive peace is about the existence of economic prosperity. The economic prosperity enjoyed by nations like Qatar and Luxembourg represents positive peace.c)Positive peace refers to the presence of military power, while negative peace is about the absence of military power. The non-nuclear nations are an example of negative peace, whereas the nuclear-armed countries indicate a state of positive peace.d)Negative peace represents a lack of environmental crises, and positive peace reflects a pristine and balanced environment. Nations like Costa Rica and Bhutan, working towards carbon neutrality, exemplify positive peace.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of How is the concept of positive peace distinct from negative peace in the study of International Relations, and what real-world example best demonstrates this distinction?a)Negative peace refers to the absence of violent conflict, while positive peace involves the presence of social justice and equity. The ceasefire agreement in the Korean peninsula is an example of negative peace, whereas the socially-balanced welfare state models in Scandinavia demonstrate positive peace.b)Negative peace is about the lack of economic conflict, while positive peace is about the existence of economic prosperity. The economic prosperity enjoyed by nations like Qatar and Luxembourg represents positive peace.c)Positive peace refers to the presence of military power, while negative peace is about the absence of military power. The non-nuclear nations are an example of negative peace, whereas the nuclear-armed countries indicate a state of positive peace.d)Negative peace represents a lack of environmental crises, and positive peace reflects a pristine and balanced environment. Nations like Costa Rica and Bhutan, working towards carbon neutrality, exemplify positive peace.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for How is the concept of positive peace distinct from negative peace in the study of International Relations, and what real-world example best demonstrates this distinction?a)Negative peace refers to the absence of violent conflict, while positive peace involves the presence of social justice and equity. The ceasefire agreement in the Korean peninsula is an example of negative peace, whereas the socially-balanced welfare state models in Scandinavia demonstrate positive peace.b)Negative peace is about the lack of economic conflict, while positive peace is about the existence of economic prosperity. The economic prosperity enjoyed by nations like Qatar and Luxembourg represents positive peace.c)Positive peace refers to the presence of military power, while negative peace is about the absence of military power. The non-nuclear nations are an example of negative peace, whereas the nuclear-armed countries indicate a state of positive peace.d)Negative peace represents a lack of environmental crises, and positive peace reflects a pristine and balanced environment. Nations like Costa Rica and Bhutan, working towards carbon neutrality, exemplify positive peace.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of How is the concept of positive peace distinct from negative peace in the study of International Relations, and what real-world example best demonstrates this distinction?a)Negative peace refers to the absence of violent conflict, while positive peace involves the presence of social justice and equity. The ceasefire agreement in the Korean peninsula is an example of negative peace, whereas the socially-balanced welfare state models in Scandinavia demonstrate positive peace.b)Negative peace is about the lack of economic conflict, while positive peace is about the existence of economic prosperity. The economic prosperity enjoyed by nations like Qatar and Luxembourg represents positive peace.c)Positive peace refers to the presence of military power, while negative peace is about the absence of military power. The non-nuclear nations are an example of negative peace, whereas the nuclear-armed countries indicate a state of positive peace.d)Negative peace represents a lack of environmental crises, and positive peace reflects a pristine and balanced environment. Nations like Costa Rica and Bhutan, working towards carbon neutrality, exemplify positive peace.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice How is the concept of positive peace distinct from negative peace in the study of International Relations, and what real-world example best demonstrates this distinction?a)Negative peace refers to the absence of violent conflict, while positive peace involves the presence of social justice and equity. The ceasefire agreement in the Korean peninsula is an example of negative peace, whereas the socially-balanced welfare state models in Scandinavia demonstrate positive peace.b)Negative peace is about the lack of economic conflict, while positive peace is about the existence of economic prosperity. The economic prosperity enjoyed by nations like Qatar and Luxembourg represents positive peace.c)Positive peace refers to the presence of military power, while negative peace is about the absence of military power. The non-nuclear nations are an example of negative peace, whereas the nuclear-armed countries indicate a state of positive peace.d)Negative peace represents a lack of environmental crises, and positive peace reflects a pristine and balanced environment. Nations like Costa Rica and Bhutan, working towards carbon neutrality, exemplify positive peace.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UGC NET tests.

Explore Courses for UGC NET exam