GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  ‘Now I am here, I ____ give you your Ch... Start Learning for Free
‘Now I am here, I ____ give you your Christmas gift. Here it is.’

Correct answer is 'can'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
‘Now I am here, I ____ give you your Christmas gift. Here it is....
‘Now I am here, I can give you your Christmas gift. Here it is.’
Can giving the gift was not a possibility until the person arrived. Also acceptable is ‘shall’.
The use of "can" indicates that the speaker has the ability or capacity to give the Christmas gift now that they are present. It suggests that the speaker is capable of performing the action of giving the gift.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
‘Now I am here, I ____ give you your Christmas gift. Here it is....
Explanation:

Use of 'can' in the sentence:
- In this sentence, the word 'can' is used to indicate the ability or permission to do something in the present moment.
- The speaker is stating that they are physically present now and therefore have the ability to give the Christmas gift at that moment.

Explanation of the sentence:
- The sentence implies that the speaker was not able to give the gift before but is now able to do so because they are present.
- It also suggests that the act of giving the gift is happening in the present moment, emphasizing the immediacy of the action.

Importance of using 'can':
- Using 'can' in this context is important because it conveys the idea that the speaker is currently in a position to give the gift, which adds a sense of urgency and immediacy to the statement.
- It also highlights the fact that the speaker's presence is essential for the gift-giving to take place, making the act more personal and meaningful.
In conclusion, the use of 'can' in the sentence effectively communicates the speaker's ability to give the Christmas gift in the present moment, emphasizing the significance of their presence in the exchange.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question as follow:Nine days of state mourning at the passing away of Britain’s queen mother will mark a unique era because the racehorse loving, gin and tonic drinking ‘grand old mum’, as the Brits called her, literally lived through the entire 20th century. While TV channels put out some black and white archival footage from another age, the formerly reverential BBC attracted criticism from the people because its newscasters did not wear black ties and they discussed the event with a frankness that would have been unthinkable a few years ago.She was widowed 50 years ago. A relic I still have in my possession amongst my naval memorabilia is a black, mourning armband issued to us when King George VI died on February 6, 1952. It was dispatched by Messrs Gieves of Old Bond Street in London, the naval tailors ‘By appointment to the King’. I recall listening to the last Christmas day broadcast of King George VI, with his consort by his side, while having dinner with a friend in Surrey. Then, a few weeks later, we were to receive news of his death while we were at sea on board our training cruiser, HMS Devonshire, headed for the Caribbean. As we proceeded to drop anchor in Barbados harbour, we were struck first, by the magnificent sight of flying fish which kept darting across the placid blue waters, and then, by the great alacrity with which mourning bands were delivered to us for the funeral ceremonies. Inevitably, we were billed by ‘Messrs Thieves’ for five shillings, a princely sum then, because our pay was four shillings a day.Brought up, as I was, in a family known for thrift, I had put that piece of uniform safely away and which, as it happened, came in handy a year later following the death of the then queen mother, Mary. Our pay had doubled to eight shillings by then, we having been promoted as midshipmen, and the commander-in-chief in Malta was Louis Mountbatten. He was a close member of the royal family, a cousin of George VI and, of course, he and his wife Edwina flew to London for the funeral service in Westminster Abbey. But the formalities connected with a royal funeral were meticulously observed by all ships of the Mediterranean fleet and thus that black armband became an absolute necessity.Q.4. Which of the following can be inferred from thepassage?

Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question as follow.I remember the astonishment I felt when I first read Shakespeare. I expected to receive a powerful aesthetic pleasure, but having read, one after the other, works regarded as his best: “King Lear,” “Romeo and Juliet,” “Hamlet” and “Macbeth,” not only did I feel no delight, but I also felt an irresistible repulsion and tedium, and doubted as to whether I was senseless in feeling works regarded as the summit of perfection by the whole of the civilized world to be trivial and positively bad, or whether the significance which this civilized world attributes to the works of Shakespeare was itself senseless. My consternation was increased by the fact that I always keenly felt the beauties of poetry in every form; then why should artistic works recognized by the whole world as those of a genius not just fail to please me, but in fact be disagreeable to me?For a long time I could not believe in myself, and during fifty years, in order to test myself, I several times recommenced reading Shakespeare in every possible form, in Russian, in English, in German and in Schlegel’s translation, as I was advised. Several times I read the dramas and the comedies and historical plays, and I invariably underwent the same feelings: repulsion, weariness, and bewilderment. At the present time, before writing this preface, being desirous once more to test myself, I have, as an old man of seventy-five, again read the whole of Shakespeare, including the historical plays, the “Henrys,” “Troilus and Cressida,” the “Tempest,” “Cymbeline,” and I have felt, with even greater force, the same feelings, this time, however, not of bewilderment, but of firm, indubitable conviction that the unquestionable glory of a great genius which Shakespeare enjoys, and which compels writers of our time to imitate him and readers and spectators to discover in him non-existent merits,—thereby distorting their aesthetic and ethical understanding,—is a great evil, as is every untruth.Although I know that the majority of people so firmly believe in the greatness of Shakespeare that in reading this judgment of mine they will not admit even to the possibility of its justice, and will not give it the slightest attention, nevertheless I will endeavour, as well as I can, to show why I believe that Shakespeare cannot be recognized either as a great genius, or even as an average author.Q.In context of the passage, what does the line—‘artistic works recognized by the whole world as those of a genius’—refer to?

The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for each question.Over the past four centuries liberalism has been so successful that it has driven all its opponents off the battlefield. Now it is disintegrating, destroyed by a mix of hubris and internal contradictions, according to Patrick Deneen, a professor of politics at the University of Notre Dame. . . . Equality of opportunity has produced a new meritocratic aristocracy that has all the aloofness of the old aristocracy with none of its sense of noblesse oblige. Democracy has degenerated into a theatre of the absurd. And technological advances are reducing ever more areas of work into meaningless drudgery. “The gap between liberalism’s claims about itself and the lived reality of the citizenry” is now so wide that “the lie can no longer be accepted,” Mr Deneen writes. What better proof of this than the vision of 1,000 private planes whisking their occupants to Davos to discuss the question of “creating a shared future in a fragmented world”? . . .Deneen does an impressive job of capturing the current mood of disillusionment, echoing leftwing complaints about rampant commercialism, right-wing complaints about narcissistic and bullying students, and general worries about atomisation and selfishness. But when he concludes that all this adds up to a failure of liberalism, is his argument convincing? . . . He argues that the essence of liberalism lies in freeing individuals from constraints. In fact, liberalism contains a wide range of intellectual traditions which provide different answers to the question of how to trade off the relative claims of rights and responsibilities, individual expression and social ties. . . . liberals experimented with a range of ideas from devolving power from the centre to creating national education systems.Mr Deneen’s fixation on the essence of liberalism leads to the second big problem of his book: his failure to recognise liberalism’s ability to reform itself and address its internal problems. The late 19th century saw America suffering from many of the problems that are reappearing today, including the creation of a business aristocracy, the rise of vast companies, the corruption of politics and the sense that society was dividing into winners and losers. But a wide variety of reformers, working within the liberal tradition, tackled these problems head on. Theodore Roosevelt took on the trusts. Progressives cleaned up government corruption. University reformers modernised academic syllabuses and built ladders of opportunity. Rather than dying, liberalism reformed itself.Mr Deneen is right to point out that the record of liberalism in recent years has been dismal. He is also right to assert that the world has much to learn from the premodern notions of liberty as self-mastery and self-denial. The biggest enemy of liberalism is not so much atomisation but old-fashioned greed, as members of the Davos elite pile their plates ever higher with perks and share options. But he is wrong to argue that the only way for people to liberate themselves from the contradictions of liberalism is “liberation from liberalism itself”. The best way to read “Why Liberalism Failed” is not as a funeral oration but as a call to action: up your game, or else.All of the following statements are evidence of the decline of liberalism today, EXCEPT

Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question as follow:Nine days of state mourning at the passing away of Britain’s queen mother will mark a unique era because the racehorse loving, gin and tonic drinking ‘grand old mum’, as the Brits called her, literally lived through the entire 20th century. While TV channels put out some black and white archival footage from another age, the formerly reverential BBC attracted criticism from the people because its newscasters did not wear black ties and they discussed the event with a frankness that would have been unthinkable a few years ago.She was widowed 50 years ago. A relic I still have in my possession amongst my naval memorabilia is a black, mourning armband issued to us when King George VI died on February 6, 1952. It was dispatched by Messrs Gieves of Old Bond Street in London, the naval tailors ‘By appointment to the King’. I recall listening to the last Christmas day broadcast of King George VI, with his consort by his side, while having dinner with a friend in Surrey. Then, a few weeks later, we were to receive news of his death while we were at sea on board our training cruiser, HMS Devonshire, headed for the Caribbean. As we proceeded to drop anchor in Barbados harbour, we were struck first, by the magnificent sight of flying fish which kept darting across the placid blue waters, and then, by the great alacrity with which mourning bands were delivered to us for the funeral ceremonies. Inevitably, we were billed by ‘Messrs Thieves’ for five shillings, a princely sum then, because our pay was four shillings a day.Brought up, as I was, in a family known for thrift, I had put that piece of uniform safely away and which, as it happened, came in handy a year later following the death of the then queen mother, Mary. Our pay had doubled to eight shillings by then, we having been promoted as midshipmen, and the commander-in-chief in Malta was Louis Mountbatten. He was a close member of the royal family, a cousin of George VI and, of course, he and his wife Edwina flew to London for the funeral service in Westminster Abbey. But the formalities connected with a royal funeral were meticulously observed by all ships of the Mediterranean fleet and thus that black armband became an absolute necessity.Q.3. At theend of the second paragraph, the author refers to ‘Messrs Gieves ofOld Bond Street’ as ‘Messrs Thieves’. This most likely suggests thatthe author

Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question as follow:Nine days of state mourning at the passing away of Britain’s queen mother will mark a unique era because the racehorse loving, gin and tonic drinking ‘grand old mum’, as the Brits called her, literally lived through the entire 20th century. While TV channels put out some black and white archival footage from another age, the formerly reverential BBC attracted criticism from the people because its newscasters did not wear black ties and they discussed the event with a frankness that would have been unthinkable a few years ago.She was widowed 50 years ago. A relic I still have in my possession amongst my naval memorabilia is a black, mourning armband issued to us when King George VI died on February 6, 1952. It was dispatched by Messrs Gieves of Old Bond Street in London, the naval tailors ‘By appointment to the King’. I recall listening to the last Christmas day broadcast of King George VI, with his consort by his side, while having dinner with a friend in Surrey. Then, a few weeks later, we were to receive news of his death while we were at sea on board our training cruiser, HMS Devonshire, headed for the Caribbean. As we proceeded to drop anchor in Barbados harbour, we were struck first, by the magnificent sight of flying fish which kept darting across the placid blue waters, and then, by the great alacrity with which mourning bands were delivered to us for the funeral ceremonies. Inevitably, we were billed by ‘Messrs Thieves’ for five shillings, a princely sum then, because our pay was four shillings a day.Brought up, as I was, in a family known for thrift, I had put that piece of uniform safely away and which, as it happened, came in handy a year later following the death of the then queen mother, Mary. Our pay had doubled to eight shillings by then, we having been promoted as midshipmen, and the commander-in-chief in Malta was Louis Mountbatten. He was a close member of the royal family, a cousin of George VI and, of course, he and his wife Edwina flew to London for the funeral service in Westminster Abbey. But the formalities connected with a royal funeral were meticulously observed by all ships of the Mediterranean fleet and thus that black armband became an absolute necessity.Q.According to the information in the passage, the life style of the British ‘Grand mum’ can best be described as

Top Courses for GMAT

‘Now I am here, I ____ give you your Christmas gift. Here it is.’Correct answer is 'can'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
‘Now I am here, I ____ give you your Christmas gift. Here it is.’Correct answer is 'can'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about ‘Now I am here, I ____ give you your Christmas gift. Here it is.’Correct answer is 'can'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for ‘Now I am here, I ____ give you your Christmas gift. Here it is.’Correct answer is 'can'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for ‘Now I am here, I ____ give you your Christmas gift. Here it is.’Correct answer is 'can'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of ‘Now I am here, I ____ give you your Christmas gift. Here it is.’Correct answer is 'can'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of ‘Now I am here, I ____ give you your Christmas gift. Here it is.’Correct answer is 'can'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for ‘Now I am here, I ____ give you your Christmas gift. Here it is.’Correct answer is 'can'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of ‘Now I am here, I ____ give you your Christmas gift. Here it is.’Correct answer is 'can'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice ‘Now I am here, I ____ give you your Christmas gift. Here it is.’Correct answer is 'can'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev