**Rate of Growth of Real Output in the First Half of the Twentieth Century**

The rate of growth of real output in a country provides an indication of the economic development and progress during a specific time period. In the case of the first half of the twentieth century, the rate of growth of real output in our country was less than 2 percent.

**Factors Influencing the Rate of Growth**

Several factors contribute to the rate of growth of real output in a country. These factors include technological advancements, population growth, investment in infrastructure, availability of resources, government policies, and external factors such as wars and global economic conditions.

**Reasons for the Rate of Growth in the First Half of the Twentieth Century**

1. **Technological Advancements:** The first half of the twentieth century witnessed significant technological advancements, particularly in the areas of manufacturing, transportation, and communication. These advancements led to increased productivity and efficiency, contributing to economic growth. However, the rate of growth was still less than 2 percent, indicating that the impact of technological advancements may have been limited during this time.

2. **Population Growth:** Population growth can have both positive and negative effects on economic growth. On one hand, a larger population can provide a larger labor force, leading to increased production. On the other hand, rapid population growth can strain resources and infrastructure, potentially limiting economic growth. In the first half of the twentieth century, our country experienced population growth, but it seems that it did not contribute significantly to the rate of growth of real output.

3. **Investment in Infrastructure:** Investment in infrastructure, such as roads, railways, and utilities, is crucial for economic growth. It facilitates the movement of goods and services, reduces transaction costs, and attracts investment. However, the rate of growth of real output during this period suggests that the level of investment in infrastructure may have been insufficient to drive higher economic growth.

4. **Availability of Resources:** The availability of natural resources, such as minerals, energy sources, and agricultural land, can significantly impact economic growth. If a country is rich in resources, it can leverage them for production and trade, leading to higher output. However, if resources are limited or mismanaged, it can hinder economic growth. The rate of growth of real output in our country during the first half of the twentieth century suggests that the availability of resources may have been a constraint to higher growth.

5. **Government Policies:** Government policies, such as taxation, regulation, trade policies, and investment incentives, play a crucial role in shaping economic growth. Favorable policies can stimulate investment, innovation, and productivity, leading to higher output. On the other hand, restrictive policies can hinder economic growth. It is possible that the government policies during this time were not conducive to achieving a higher rate of growth of real output.

6. **External Factors:** External factors, such as wars and global economic conditions, can have a significant impact on a country's economic growth. Wars can disrupt production and trade, divert resources, and cause instability. Global economic conditions, such as recessions or booms, can influence demand for a country's exports and affect investment and trade flows. It is important to consider these external factors when analyzing the rate of growth of real output during the first half of the twentieth century.

**Conclusion**

In conclusion, the rate of growth of real output in our country during the first half of the twentieth century was less than 2 percent. This suggests that

Because that's time our country suffered from worst condition due to britishers