All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Class 8 Exam  >  Class 8 Questions  >  How do historians use the sources like manusc... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
How do historians use the sources like manuscripts and inscriptions?
  • a)
    To reconstruct historical battles only
  • b)
    To understand economic systems only
  • c)
    To gather information and reconstruct the past
  • d)
    To predict future events
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
How do historians use the sources like manuscripts and inscriptions?a)...
Importance of Manuscripts and Inscriptions for Historians
Understanding the past is crucial for historians, and sources like manuscripts and inscriptions play a key role in this process. Here's how historians use these sources:

Primary Sources of Information
- Manuscripts and inscriptions are primary sources of information that provide direct evidence from the time period being studied.
- They offer insights into the thoughts, beliefs, practices, and events of the past, helping historians reconstruct historical narratives.

Reconstructing the Past
- Historians use manuscripts and inscriptions to gather information about various aspects of society, culture, politics, and economics.
- By analyzing these sources, historians can reconstruct the past and gain a deeper understanding of historical events and developments.

Cross-Referencing and Verification
- Manuscripts and inscriptions allow historians to cross-reference information from different sources to verify the accuracy of their findings.
- This process helps historians create a more comprehensive and reliable picture of the past.

Preserving Cultural Heritage
- Manuscripts and inscriptions are valuable cultural artifacts that provide insights into the languages, writing systems, and artistic styles of past civilizations.
- Historians use these sources to preserve and promote cultural heritage by studying and documenting them.

Challenges and Limitations
- While manuscripts and inscriptions are valuable sources of information, they may have limitations such as bias, incomplete information, or damage over time.
- Historians need to critically analyze and interpret these sources to extract meaningful insights about the past.
In conclusion, historians use manuscripts and inscriptions to gather information, reconstruct the past, verify findings, preserve cultural heritage, and overcome challenges in understanding historical events and developments.
Attention Class 8 Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Class 8 study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Class 8.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for Class 8 exam

Similar Class 8 Doubts

The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for each question.The Positivists, anxious to stake out their claim for history as a science, contributed the weight of their influence to the cult of facts. First ascertain the facts, said the positivists, then draw your conclusions from them. . . . This is what may [be] called the common-sense view of history. History consists of a corpus of ascertained facts. The facts are available to the historian in documents, inscriptions, and so on . . . [Sir George Clark] contrasted the "hard core of facts" in history with the surrounding pulp of disputable interpretation forgetting perhaps that the pulpy part of the fruit is more rewarding than the hard core. . . . It recalls the favourite dictum of the great liberal journalist C. P. Scott: "Facts are sacred, opinion is free.". .What is a historical fact? . . . According to the common-sense view, there are certain basic facts which are the same for all historians and which form, so to speak, the backbone of history—the fact, for example, that the Battle of Hastings was fought in 1066. But this view calls for two observations. In the first place, it is not with facts like these that the historian is primarily concerned. It is no doubt important to know that the great battle was fought in 1066 and not in 1065 or 1067, and that it was fought at Hastings and not at Eastbourne or Brighton. The historian must not get these things wrong. But [to] praise a historian for his accuracy is like praising an architect for using well-seasoned timber or properly mixed concrete in his building. It is a necessary condition of his work, but not his essential function. It is precisely for matters of this kind that the historian is entitled to rely on what have been called the "auxiliary sciences" of history—archaeology, epigraphy, numismatics, chronology, and so forth. . . .The second observation is that the necessity to establish these basic facts rests not on any quality in the facts themselves, but on an apriori decision of the historian. In spite of C. P. Scotts motto, every journalist knows today that the most effective way to influence opinion is by the selection and arrangement of the appropriate facts. It used to be said that facts speak for themselves. This is, of course, untrue. The facts speak only when the historian calls on them: it is he who decides to which facts to give the floor, and in what order or context. . . . The only reason why we are interested to know that the battle was fought at Hastings in 1066 is that historians regard it as a major historical event. . . . Professor Talcott Parsons once called [science] "a selective system of cognitive orientations to reality." It might perhaps have been put more simply. But history is, among other things, that. The historian is necessarily selective. The belief in a hard core of historical facts existing objectively and independently of the interpretation of the historian is a preposterous fallacy, but one which it is very hard to eradicate.If the author of the passage were to write a book on the Battle of Hastings along the lines of his/her own reasoning, the focus of the historical account would be on

The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for each question.The Positivists, anxious to stake out their claim for history as a science, contributed the weight of their influence to the cult of facts. First ascertain the facts, said the positivists, then draw your conclusions from them. . . . This is what may [be] called the common-sense view of history. History consists of a corpus of ascertained facts. The facts are available to the historian in documents, inscriptions, and so on . . . [Sir George Clark] contrasted the "hard core of facts" in history with the surrounding pulp of disputable interpretation forgetting perhaps that the pulpy part of the fruit is more rewarding than the hard core. . . . It recalls the favourite dictum of the great liberal journalist C. P. Scott: "Facts are sacred, opinion is free.". . .What is a historical fact? . . . According to the common-sense view, there are certain basic facts which are the same for all historians and which form, so to speak, the backbone of history—the fact, for example, that the Battle of Hastings was fought in 1066. But this view calls for two observations. In the first place, it is not with facts like these that the historian is primarily concerned. It is no doubt important to know that the great battle was fought in 1066 and not in 1065 or 1067, and that it was fought at Hastings and not at Eastbourne or Brighton. The historian must not get these things wrong. But [to] praise a historian for his accuracy is like praising an architect for using well-seasoned timber or properly mixed concrete in his building. It is a necessary condition of his work, but not his essential function. It is precisely for matters of this kind that the historian is entitled to rely on what have been called the "auxiliary sciences" of history—archaeology, epigraphy, numismatics, chronology, and so forth. . . .The second observation is that the necessity to establish these basic facts rests not on any quality in the facts themselves, but on an apriori decision of the historian. In spite of C. P. Scotts motto, every journalist knows today that the most effective way to influence opinion is by the selection and arrangement of the appropriate facts. It used to be said that facts speak for themselves. This is, of course, untrue. The facts speak only when the historian calls on them: it is he who decides to which facts to give the floor, and in what order or context. . . . The only reason why we are interested to know that the battle was fought at Hastings in 1066 is that historians regard it as a major historical event. . . . Professor Talcott Parsons once called [science] "a selective system of cognitive orientations to reality." It might perhaps have been put more simply. But history is, among other things, that. The historian is necessarily selective. The belief in a hard core of historical facts existing objectively and independently of the interpretation of the historian is a preposterous fallacy, but one which it is very hard to eradicate.According to this passage, which one of the following statements best describes the significance of archaeology for historians?

The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for each question.The Positivists, anxious to stake out their claim for history as a science, contributed the weight of their influence to the cult of facts. First ascertain the facts, said the positivists, then draw your conclusions from them. . . . This is what may [be] called the common-sense view of history. History consists of a corpus of ascertained facts. The facts are available to the historian in documents, inscriptions, and so on . . . [Sir George Clark] contrasted the "hard core of facts" in history with the surrounding pulp of disputable interpretation forgetting perhaps that the pulpy part of the fruit is more rewarding than the hard core. . . . It recalls the favourite dictum of the great liberal journalist C. P. Scott: "Facts are sacred, opinion is free.". . .What is a historical fact? . . . According to the common-sense view, there are certain basic facts which are the same for all historians and which form, so to speak, the backbone of history—the fact, for example, that the Battle of Hastings was fought in 1066. But this view calls for two observations. In the first place, it is not with facts like these that the historian is primarily concerned. It is no doubt important to know that the great battle was fought in 1066 and not in 1065 or 1067, and that it was fought at Hastings and not at Eastbourne or Brighton. The historian must not get these things wrong. But [to] praise a historian for his accuracy is like praising an architect for using well-seasoned timber or properly mixed concrete in his building. It is a necessary condition of his work, but not his essential function. It is precisely for matters of this kind that the historian is entitled to rely on what have been called the "auxiliary sciences" of history—archaeology, epigraphy, numismatics, chronology, and so forth. . . .The second observation is that the necessity to establish these basic facts rests not on any quality in the facts themselves, but on an apriori decision of the historian. In spite of C. P. Scotts motto, every journalist knows today that the most effective way to influence opinion is by the selection and arrangement of the appropriate facts. It used to be said that facts speak for themselves. This is, of course, untrue. The facts speak only when the historian calls on them: it is he who decides to which facts to give the floor, and in what order or context. . . . The only reason why we are interested to know that the battle was fought at Hastings in 1066 is that historians regard it as a major historical event. . . . Professor Talcott Parsons once called [science] "a selective system of cognitive orientations to reality." It might perhaps have been put more simply. But history is, among other things, that. The historian is necessarily selective. The belief in a hard core of historical facts existing objectively and independently of the interpretation of the historian is a preposterous fallacy, but one which it is very hard to eradicate.All of the following describe the "common-sense view" of history, EXCEPT

Top Courses for Class 8View all

Top Courses for Class 8

How do historians use the sources like manuscripts and inscriptions?a)To reconstruct historical battles onlyb)To understand economic systems onlyc)To gather information and reconstruct the pastd)To predict future eventsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
How do historians use the sources like manuscripts and inscriptions?a)To reconstruct historical battles onlyb)To understand economic systems onlyc)To gather information and reconstruct the pastd)To predict future eventsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for Class 8 2024 is part of Class 8 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 8 exam syllabus. Information about How do historians use the sources like manuscripts and inscriptions?a)To reconstruct historical battles onlyb)To understand economic systems onlyc)To gather information and reconstruct the pastd)To predict future eventsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Class 8 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for How do historians use the sources like manuscripts and inscriptions?a)To reconstruct historical battles onlyb)To understand economic systems onlyc)To gather information and reconstruct the pastd)To predict future eventsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for How do historians use the sources like manuscripts and inscriptions?a)To reconstruct historical battles onlyb)To understand economic systems onlyc)To gather information and reconstruct the pastd)To predict future eventsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 8. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 8 Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of How do historians use the sources like manuscripts and inscriptions?a)To reconstruct historical battles onlyb)To understand economic systems onlyc)To gather information and reconstruct the pastd)To predict future eventsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of How do historians use the sources like manuscripts and inscriptions?a)To reconstruct historical battles onlyb)To understand economic systems onlyc)To gather information and reconstruct the pastd)To predict future eventsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for How do historians use the sources like manuscripts and inscriptions?a)To reconstruct historical battles onlyb)To understand economic systems onlyc)To gather information and reconstruct the pastd)To predict future eventsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of How do historians use the sources like manuscripts and inscriptions?a)To reconstruct historical battles onlyb)To understand economic systems onlyc)To gather information and reconstruct the pastd)To predict future eventsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice How do historians use the sources like manuscripts and inscriptions?a)To reconstruct historical battles onlyb)To understand economic systems onlyc)To gather information and reconstruct the pastd)To predict future eventsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Class 8 tests.
Explore Courses for Class 8 exam

Top Courses for Class 8

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup