Why we should not accept the ‘Hindu-Muslim’ periodisation of Indian history?
There are several reasons why we should not accept the ‘Hindu-Muslim’ periodisation of Indian history:

1. Oversimplification of Indian History:
- The ‘Hindu-Muslim’ periodisation oversimplifies the rich and complex history of India by reducing it to a binary division based on religious lines.
- It ignores the diversity and plurality of Indian society, which has been shaped by various cultures, religions, and traditions.

2. Fuels Communalism:
- Accepting this periodisation reinforces communal divisions and encourages a divisive understanding of Indian history.
- It perpetuates the idea of religious conflicts as the defining feature of Indian history, overshadowing the instances of harmony and coexistence between different religious communities.

3. Neglects Other Important Periods:
- By focusing solely on the ‘Hindu-Muslim’ periodisation, other significant periods in Indian history are often overlooked or marginalized.
- It disregards the contributions of various dynasties, empires, and movements that have played a crucial role in shaping India's history.

4. Hinders Understanding of Historical Developments:
- Viewing Indian history through the lens of ‘Hindu-Muslim’ periodisation limits our understanding of the complex socio-political dynamics that have influenced the course of history.
- It fails to capture the nuances and intricacies of historical events and developments, leading to a distorted interpretation of India's past.
In conclusion, it is essential to move beyond the ‘Hindu-Muslim’ periodisation and adopt a more holistic and inclusive approach to studying Indian history. By acknowledging the diversity, complexity, and interconnectedness of India's historical narrative, we can gain a deeper and more nuanced understanding of the country's rich heritage.