All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Bank Exams Exam  >  Bank Exams Questions  >   Consider the following statements about the ... Start Learning for Free
Consider the following statements about the archaeological sites:
1. Amri is located south of Mohenjo-daro in Pakistan and was excavated by Jean-Marie Casal.
2. Balakot, discovered by Robert Raikes, is situated near the middle of the Khurkera plain on the southeastern side of the Las Bela Valley.
3. Desalpur was a fortified township built of dressed stone with mud filling inside, discovered by P. P Pandya and MA Dhakey.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    1 and 2 Only
  • c)
    1 and 3 Only
  • d)
    1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your Bank Exams doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Consider the following statements about the archaeological sites:1. A...
Explanation:

Amri:
- Amri is located south of Mohenjo-daro in Pakistan.
- It was excavated by Jean-Marie Casal.

Balakot:
- Balakot was discovered by Robert Raikes.
- It is situated near the middle of the Khurkera plain on the southeastern side of the Las Bela Valley.

Desalpur:
- Desalpur was a fortified township built of dressed stone with mud filling inside.
- It was discovered by P. P Pandya and MA Dhakey.
Therefore, all three statements are correct:
- Statement 1: Amri is located south of Mohenjo-daro in Pakistan and was excavated by Jean-Marie Casal.
- Statement 2: Balakot, discovered by Robert Raikes, is situated near the middle of the Khurkera plain on the southeastern side of the Las Bela Valley.
- Statement 3: Desalpur was a fortified township built of dressed stone with mud filling inside, discovered by P. P Pandya and MA Dhakey.
Explore Courses for Bank Exams exam

Similar Bank Exams Doubts

Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.Archaeology as a profession faces two major prob-lems. First, it is the poorest of the poor. Only paltrysums are available for excavating and even less is avail-able for publishing the results and preserving the sites(5) once excavated. Yet archaeologists deal with pricelessobjects every day. Second, there is the problem of illegalexcavation, resulting in museum-quality pieces beingsold to the highest bidder.I would like to make an outrageous suggestion that(10) would at one stroke provide funds for archaeology andreduce the amount of illegal digging. I would proposethat scientific archeological expeditions and govern-mental authorities sell excavated artifacts on the openmarket. Such sales would provide substantial funds for(15) the excavation and preservation of archaeological sitesand the publication of results. At the same time, theywould break the illegal excavator’s grip on the market,thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegalactivities.(20) You might object that professionals excavate toacquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient arti-facts are part of our global cultural heritage, whichshould be available for all to appreciate, not sold to thehighest bidder. I agree. Sell nothing that has unique(25) artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply,everything that comes our of the ground has scientificvalue. Here we part company. Theoretically, you may becorrect in claiming that every artifact has potential scien-tific value. Practically, you are wrong.(30)I refer to the thousands of pottery vessels and ancientlamps that are essentially duplicates of one another. Inone small excavation in Cyprus, archaeologists recentlyuncovered 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs ina single courtyard, Even precious royal seal impressions(35) known as/melekh handles have been found in abun-dance---more than 4,000 examples so far.The basements of museums are simply not largeenough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discov-ered in the future. There is not enough money even to(40) catalogue the finds; as a result, they cannot be foundagain and become as inaccessible as if they had neverbeen discovered. Indeed, with the help of a computer,sold artifacts could be more accessible than are thepieces stored in bulging museum basements. Prior to(45) sale, each could be photographed and the list of thepurchasers could be maintained on the computer Apurchaser could even be required to agree to return thepiece if it should become needed for scientific purposes.It would be unrealistic to suggest that illegal digging(50) would stop if artifacts were sold on the open market.But the demand for the clandestine product would besubstantially reduced. Who would want an unmarkedpot when another was available whose provenance wasknown, and that was dated stratigraphically by theprofessional archaeologist who excavated it?Q.The author implies that all of the following statements about duplicate artifacts are true EXCEPT

Read the following passage and answer the questions that follows:Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the poorest of the poor. Only paltry sums are available for excavating and even less is available for publishing the results and preserving the sites once excavated. Yet archaeologists deal with priceless objects every day.Second, there is the problem of illegal excavation, resulting in museum-quality pieces being sold to the highest bidder.I would like to make an outrageous suggestion that would at one stroke provide funds for archaeology and reduce the amount of illegal digging. I would propose that scientific archeological expeditions and governmental authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market. Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results. At the same time, they would break the illegal excavator’s grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities.You might object that professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder. I agree. Sell nothing that has unique artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply, everything that comes out of the ground has scientific value. Here we part company. Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, you are wrong.I refer to the thousands of pottery vessels and ancient lamps that are essentially duplicates of one another. In one small excavation in Cyprus, archaeologists recently uncovered 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs in a single courtyard, even precious royal seal impressions known as melekh handles have been found in abundance — more than 4,000 examples so far.The basement of museums is simply not large enough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discovered in the future. There is not enough money even to catalogue the finds; as a result, they cannot be found again and become as inaccessible as if they had never been discovered. Indeed, with the help of a computer, sold artifacts could be more accessible than are the pieces stored in bulging museum basements. Prior to sale, each could be photographed and the list of the purchasers could be maintained on the computer A purchaser could even be required to agree to return the piece if it should become needed for scientific purposes. It would be unrealistic to suggest that illegal digging would stop if artifacts were sold in the open market. But the demand for the clandestine product would be substantially reduced. Who would want an unmarked pot when another was available whose provenance was known, and that was dated stratigraphically by the professional archaeologist who excavated it?Q.The author implies that all of the following statements about duplicate artifacts are true EXCEPT

Read the following passage and answer the questions that follows:Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the poorest of the poor. Only paltry sums are available for excavating and even less is available for publishing the results and preserving the sites once excavated. Yet archaeologists deal with priceless objects every day.Second, there is the problem of illegal excavation, resulting in museum-quality pieces being sold to the highest bidder.I would like to make an outrageous suggestion that would at one stroke provide funds for archaeology and reduce the amount of illegal digging. I would propose that scientific archeological expeditions and governmental authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market. Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results. At the same time, they would break the illegal excavator’s grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities.You might object that professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder. I agree. Sell nothing that has unique artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply, everything that comes out of the ground has scientific value. Here we part company. Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, you are wrong.I refer to the thousands of pottery vessels and ancient lamps that are essentially duplicates of one another. In one small excavation in Cyprus, archaeologists recently uncovered 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs in a single courtyard, even precious royal seal impressions known as melekh handles have been found in abundance — more than 4,000 examples so far.The basement of museums is simply not large enough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discovered in the future. There is not enough money even to catalogue the finds; as a result, they cannot be found again and become as inaccessible as if they had never been discovered. Indeed, with the help of a computer, sold artifacts could be more accessible than are the pieces stored in bulging museum basements. Prior to sale, each could be photographed and the list of the purchasers could be maintained on the computer A purchaser could even be required to agree to return the piece if it should become needed for scientific purposes. It would be unrealistic to suggest thatillegal digging would stop if artifacts were sold in the open market. But the demand for the clandestine product would be substantially reduced. Who would want an unmarked pot when another was available whose provenance was known, and that was dated stratigraphically by the professional archaeologist who excavated it?Q.Which of the following is mentioned in the passage as a disadvantage of storing artifacts in museum basements?

Top Courses for Bank ExamsView all

Top Courses for Bank Exams

Consider the following statements about the archaeological sites:1. Amri is located south of Mohenjo-daro in Pakistan and was excavated by Jean-Marie Casal.2. Balakot, discovered by Robert Raikes, is situated near the middle of the Khurkera plain on the southeastern side of the Las Bela Valley.3. Desalpur was a fortified township built of dressed stone with mud filling inside, discovered by P. P Pandya and MA Dhakey.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Consider the following statements about the archaeological sites:1. Amri is located south of Mohenjo-daro in Pakistan and was excavated by Jean-Marie Casal.2. Balakot, discovered by Robert Raikes, is situated near the middle of the Khurkera plain on the southeastern side of the Las Bela Valley.3. Desalpur was a fortified township built of dressed stone with mud filling inside, discovered by P. P Pandya and MA Dhakey.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Bank Exams 2025 is part of Bank Exams preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Bank Exams exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following statements about the archaeological sites:1. Amri is located south of Mohenjo-daro in Pakistan and was excavated by Jean-Marie Casal.2. Balakot, discovered by Robert Raikes, is situated near the middle of the Khurkera plain on the southeastern side of the Las Bela Valley.3. Desalpur was a fortified township built of dressed stone with mud filling inside, discovered by P. P Pandya and MA Dhakey.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Bank Exams 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following statements about the archaeological sites:1. Amri is located south of Mohenjo-daro in Pakistan and was excavated by Jean-Marie Casal.2. Balakot, discovered by Robert Raikes, is situated near the middle of the Khurkera plain on the southeastern side of the Las Bela Valley.3. Desalpur was a fortified township built of dressed stone with mud filling inside, discovered by P. P Pandya and MA Dhakey.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Consider the following statements about the archaeological sites:1. Amri is located south of Mohenjo-daro in Pakistan and was excavated by Jean-Marie Casal.2. Balakot, discovered by Robert Raikes, is situated near the middle of the Khurkera plain on the southeastern side of the Las Bela Valley.3. Desalpur was a fortified township built of dressed stone with mud filling inside, discovered by P. P Pandya and MA Dhakey.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Bank Exams. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Bank Exams Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Consider the following statements about the archaeological sites:1. Amri is located south of Mohenjo-daro in Pakistan and was excavated by Jean-Marie Casal.2. Balakot, discovered by Robert Raikes, is situated near the middle of the Khurkera plain on the southeastern side of the Las Bela Valley.3. Desalpur was a fortified township built of dressed stone with mud filling inside, discovered by P. P Pandya and MA Dhakey.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Consider the following statements about the archaeological sites:1. Amri is located south of Mohenjo-daro in Pakistan and was excavated by Jean-Marie Casal.2. Balakot, discovered by Robert Raikes, is situated near the middle of the Khurkera plain on the southeastern side of the Las Bela Valley.3. Desalpur was a fortified township built of dressed stone with mud filling inside, discovered by P. P Pandya and MA Dhakey.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Consider the following statements about the archaeological sites:1. Amri is located south of Mohenjo-daro in Pakistan and was excavated by Jean-Marie Casal.2. Balakot, discovered by Robert Raikes, is situated near the middle of the Khurkera plain on the southeastern side of the Las Bela Valley.3. Desalpur was a fortified township built of dressed stone with mud filling inside, discovered by P. P Pandya and MA Dhakey.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Consider the following statements about the archaeological sites:1. Amri is located south of Mohenjo-daro in Pakistan and was excavated by Jean-Marie Casal.2. Balakot, discovered by Robert Raikes, is situated near the middle of the Khurkera plain on the southeastern side of the Las Bela Valley.3. Desalpur was a fortified township built of dressed stone with mud filling inside, discovered by P. P Pandya and MA Dhakey.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Consider the following statements about the archaeological sites:1. Amri is located south of Mohenjo-daro in Pakistan and was excavated by Jean-Marie Casal.2. Balakot, discovered by Robert Raikes, is situated near the middle of the Khurkera plain on the southeastern side of the Las Bela Valley.3. Desalpur was a fortified township built of dressed stone with mud filling inside, discovered by P. P Pandya and MA Dhakey.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Bank Exams tests.
Explore Courses for Bank Exams exam

Top Courses for Bank Exams

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup