UGC NET Exam > UGC NET Questions > How does abductive reasoning differ from indu...
Start Learning for Free
How does abductive reasoning differ from inductive reasoning?
- a)Abductive reasoning starts with specific observations to form a general rule.
- b)Inductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to predict specific observations.
- c)Abductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to explain specific observations.
- d)Inductive reasoning involves inferring the best explanation from a set of facts.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
How does abductive reasoning differ from inductive reasoning?a) Abduct...
Abductive reasoning differs from inductive reasoning in that it starts with a hypothesis to explain specific observations, aiming to find the best explanation for the evidence at hand.
Most Upvoted Answer
How does abductive reasoning differ from inductive reasoning?a) Abduct...
Understanding Abductive Reasoning
Abductive reasoning is a logical process that starts with observations and seeks to find the most likely explanation for those observations. It is often used when we have incomplete information and need to form a hypothesis that best accounts for the available data.
Understanding Inductive Reasoning
Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves forming general conclusions based on specific instances or observations. It moves from the particular to the general, making broad generalizations based on limited data.
Why 'C' is Correct
The correct answer, option 'C', states that abductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to explain specific observations. This is accurate because:
In conclusion, while both reasoning types analyze observations, abductive reasoning uniquely emphasizes creating hypotheses to explain those observations, distinguishing it from inductive reasoning.
Abductive reasoning is a logical process that starts with observations and seeks to find the most likely explanation for those observations. It is often used when we have incomplete information and need to form a hypothesis that best accounts for the available data.
- Begins with specific observations.
- Seeks the best possible explanation.
- Often involves guessing or hypothesizing based on the evidence at hand.
Understanding Inductive Reasoning
Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves forming general conclusions based on specific instances or observations. It moves from the particular to the general, making broad generalizations based on limited data.
- Starts with specific observations to form general rules.
- Involves predicting future occurrences based on past experiences.
- Conclusions are probable but not guaranteed.
Why 'C' is Correct
The correct answer, option 'C', states that abductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to explain specific observations. This is accurate because:
- Abductive reasoning is focused on finding the best explanation for the observations.
- It does not simply generalize from specific instances like inductive reasoning does.
- It emphasizes formulating a hypothesis based on the observations available, which is crucial in investigative processes.
In conclusion, while both reasoning types analyze observations, abductive reasoning uniquely emphasizes creating hypotheses to explain those observations, distinguishing it from inductive reasoning.
|
Explore Courses for UGC NET exam
|
|
Top Courses for UGC NETView all
Question Description
How does abductive reasoning differ from inductive reasoning?a) Abductive reasoning starts with specific observations to form a general rule.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to predict specific observations.c) Abductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to explain specific observations.d) Inductive reasoning involves inferring the best explanation from a set of facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for UGC NET 2025 is part of UGC NET preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UGC NET exam syllabus. Information about How does abductive reasoning differ from inductive reasoning?a) Abductive reasoning starts with specific observations to form a general rule.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to predict specific observations.c) Abductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to explain specific observations.d) Inductive reasoning involves inferring the best explanation from a set of facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UGC NET 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for How does abductive reasoning differ from inductive reasoning?a) Abductive reasoning starts with specific observations to form a general rule.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to predict specific observations.c) Abductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to explain specific observations.d) Inductive reasoning involves inferring the best explanation from a set of facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
How does abductive reasoning differ from inductive reasoning?a) Abductive reasoning starts with specific observations to form a general rule.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to predict specific observations.c) Abductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to explain specific observations.d) Inductive reasoning involves inferring the best explanation from a set of facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for UGC NET 2025 is part of UGC NET preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UGC NET exam syllabus. Information about How does abductive reasoning differ from inductive reasoning?a) Abductive reasoning starts with specific observations to form a general rule.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to predict specific observations.c) Abductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to explain specific observations.d) Inductive reasoning involves inferring the best explanation from a set of facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UGC NET 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for How does abductive reasoning differ from inductive reasoning?a) Abductive reasoning starts with specific observations to form a general rule.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to predict specific observations.c) Abductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to explain specific observations.d) Inductive reasoning involves inferring the best explanation from a set of facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for How does abductive reasoning differ from inductive reasoning?a) Abductive reasoning starts with specific observations to form a general rule.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to predict specific observations.c) Abductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to explain specific observations.d) Inductive reasoning involves inferring the best explanation from a set of facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UGC NET.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UGC NET Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of How does abductive reasoning differ from inductive reasoning?a) Abductive reasoning starts with specific observations to form a general rule.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to predict specific observations.c) Abductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to explain specific observations.d) Inductive reasoning involves inferring the best explanation from a set of facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
How does abductive reasoning differ from inductive reasoning?a) Abductive reasoning starts with specific observations to form a general rule.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to predict specific observations.c) Abductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to explain specific observations.d) Inductive reasoning involves inferring the best explanation from a set of facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for How does abductive reasoning differ from inductive reasoning?a) Abductive reasoning starts with specific observations to form a general rule.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to predict specific observations.c) Abductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to explain specific observations.d) Inductive reasoning involves inferring the best explanation from a set of facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of How does abductive reasoning differ from inductive reasoning?a) Abductive reasoning starts with specific observations to form a general rule.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to predict specific observations.c) Abductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to explain specific observations.d) Inductive reasoning involves inferring the best explanation from a set of facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice How does abductive reasoning differ from inductive reasoning?a) Abductive reasoning starts with specific observations to form a general rule.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to predict specific observations.c) Abductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis to explain specific observations.d) Inductive reasoning involves inferring the best explanation from a set of facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UGC NET tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for UGC NET exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup on EduRev and stay on top of your study goals
10M+ students crushing their study goals daily