Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?a)The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.b)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.c)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.d)The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the arguments advocacy of a particular strategy.e)The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Environmental organizations want to preserve ...

Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.

In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?

a)
The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
b)
The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
c)
The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
d)
The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument's advocacy of a particular strategy.
e)
The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the ...

Boldface 1: Preservation of the Wilgrinn land (that’s got to be the goal referred to by the answer choices). Reading on… The plan is ill-conceived (not the goal, but the plan—argument does not argue against the goal, but does argue against the plan for achieving the goal), so, the goal is preservation of the land (First Boldface) and that’s also part of the main conclusion so First Boldface is a goal with which the argument basically agrees so A and B are not true.

Boldface 2: Doesn’t really relate to the main conclusion, so… Return to the answer choices and consider second Boldface description in remaining choices. C and D are still possibilities, but… E implies that the argument suggests changing a situation in order to make attainment of the goal possible. But the argument suggests changing the entire strategy for attaining the goal, which is not the same thing, at all—so the second Boldface part of this choice doesn’t fit. Also, the argument doesn’t really endorse the goal so much as it endorses a particular strategy by which to attain the goal. So the first part of Choice E doesn’t fit, either E is not correct, leaving us with C and D. Read Choice C in its entirety: (1) says the first Boldface presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained. Not exactly—the argument actually concludes that a different strategy is needed to attain the goal, not simply that the goal is attainable (so this part of this choice doesn’t match the argument). (2) Says the second Boldface in the argument is a judgment disputing whether the goal can be attained. NO, definitely not—the second BF in the argument suggests a reason why one strategy won’t succeed, but has nothing to do with whether the goal can be attained—the second part of this choice clearly doesn’t match the argument, at all so C is incorrect. Now look at the remaining choice, to make sure it fits: (1) Goal, strategies for achieving under consideration—YES. (2) An opinion or judgment that serves as the basis supporting an alternative to the earlier plan, but with the same ultimate goal—preservation of Wilgrinn land—YES. So, the final answer is D.

View all questions of this test

Share your Answer

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMATView all

Quantitative for GMAT

GMAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for GMAT

Verbal for GMAT

Mock Test Series for GMAT Classic Edition

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

Question Description
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?a)The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.b)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.c)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.d)The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the arguments advocacy of a particular strategy.e)The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?a)The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.b)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.c)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.d)The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the arguments advocacy of a particular strategy.e)The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?a)The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.b)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.c)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.d)The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the arguments advocacy of a particular strategy.e)The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?a)The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.b)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.c)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.d)The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the arguments advocacy of a particular strategy.e)The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?a)The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.b)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.c)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.d)The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the arguments advocacy of a particular strategy.e)The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?a)The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.b)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.c)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.d)The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the arguments advocacy of a particular strategy.e)The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?a)The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.b)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.c)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.d)The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the arguments advocacy of a particular strategy.e)The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?a)The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.b)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.c)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.d)The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the arguments advocacy of a particular strategy.e)The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?a)The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.b)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.c)The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.d)The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the arguments advocacy of a particular strategy.e)The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam