Which of the following is NOT a source of history?a)Oral storiesb)Inscriptionsc)Archaeological remainsd)Science fiction novelsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Question

Answer

Oral stories, or folk stories, have been passed down for generations. We can find, in the remotest of villages, folklore from millennia ago. Even in regular villages, we can find considerably old folk tales. Theese are a way of finding out how things were in the past, aka, a source of history.
Inscription in ancient temples and the ruins of them, walls, stones, and even on pillars, are a written source of history. If translated correctly, they can tell us loads of information about the past of that particular place.
Archeological remains, like coins, pots, bits of cloth, and even buildings tell us how people lived and what tools they used to help them survive. They are an interesting source of history.
Science fiction novels are an excellent source of history - wait, what? Science fiction novels aren't used as sources of history! They are used as sources of entertainment! The correct answer is definitely 'D'.

Answer

Science fiction novels are fictional and not used as historical sources.

Answer

Understanding Sources of History
History is built upon various sources that provide insights into past events, cultures, and societies. These sources can be categorized into primary and secondary sources, each offering unique perspectives.
Sources of History
- Oral Stories:
- Oral traditions are narratives transmitted from one generation to another.
- They often hold cultural significance and can reveal historical events, values, and beliefs.
- Inscriptions:
- Inscriptions are writings carved into materials like stone or metal.
- They serve as direct evidence of historical facts, announcements, and decrees.
- Archaeological Remains:
- These include artifacts, structures, and other physical evidence uncovered through excavations.
- Archaeological findings help reconstruct past societies and their lifestyles.
Why Science Fiction Novels Are Not a Source of History
- Fictional Nature:
- Science fiction novels are imaginative works that create fictional worlds and scenarios.
- They do not aim to provide factual accounts of historical events.
- Lack of Historical Evidence:
- Unlike the other sources, science fiction does not rely on actual historical data or evidence.
- Instead, it often explores speculative ideas about the future or alternative realities.
- Purpose of Creation:
- The primary purpose of science fiction is entertainment and exploration of concepts rather than documentation of history.
In conclusion, while oral stories, inscriptions, and archaeological remains are vital for understanding history, science fiction novels do not serve as reliable sources, as they are imaginative narratives rather than factual accounts.

Similar Class 7 Doubts

Which type of source includes poems, songs, and legends passed down orally?

Give two example of archaeological source. Related: NCERT Solutions - Tracing Changes Through a Thousand Years?

Needed a Document for write a short note on history of importance of yoga? Related: Short Answer Type Questions - Novels, Society & History?

what did puranic stories consist Related: Tribes, Nomads And Settled Communities, CBSE Class 7 SST History

Explain elaborately India's dominance in the world cricket history Related: NCERT Solutions: Chapter 10 - The Story of Cricket, English, Class 7?

Top Courses for Class 7View all

Science Class 7

Mathematics (Maths) Class 7

Social Studies (SST) Class 7

English Grammar Class 7

Worksheets with solutions for Class 7

Top Courses for Class 7

Top Courses for Class 7

Suggested Free Tests

Related Content

Class 7 Study Material

Class 7 Subjects

Competitive Examinations for Class 7

NCERT Books

Reference Books for Class 7

NCERT Solutions

Other Popular Exams

Company