Difference Between Conventional and Non-Conventional Energy
Conventional and non-conventional energy sources play crucial roles in meeting the world's energy demands. Here’s a detailed comparison:

Definition
- Conventional Energy: Energy derived from established sources like fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas) and nuclear power.
- Non-Conventional Energy: Energy generated from renewable sources such as solar, wind, hydro, biomass, and geothermal.

Availability
- Conventional Energy: Limited and depleting resources; availability is tied to geological formations and extraction processes.
- Non-Conventional Energy: Abundant and renewable; constantly replenished by natural processes.

Environmental Impact
- Conventional Energy: High carbon emissions, pollution, and environmental degradation; contributes to climate change.
- Non-Conventional Energy: Minimal environmental impact; significantly lower emissions and sustainable practices.

Cost
- Conventional Energy: Initially lower costs due to established infrastructure, but subject to price volatility and external factors.
- Non-Conventional Energy: Higher initial investment for technology, but decreasing costs and long-term savings on fuel.

Energy Security
- Conventional Energy: Vulnerable to geopolitical tensions and resource depletion; can lead to energy crises.
- Non-Conventional Energy: Enhances energy security by diversifying energy sources and reducing dependency on imports.

Technological Development
- Conventional Energy: Mature technologies; less innovation due to established systems.
- Non-Conventional Energy: Rapid advancements in technology; ongoing research and development improving efficiency.
In summary, while conventional energy has been the backbone of energy production for decades, non-conventional energy sources are gaining traction due to their sustainability and lower environmental footprint. Transitioning to renewable energy is essential for a sustainable future.