CA Foundation Exam > CA Foundation Questions > Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs...
Start Learning for Free
Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1st January. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?
- a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damages
- b)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility applies
- c)Yes, doctrine of frustration will apply
- d)Option (b) but not (c)
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1st...
's workers delayed production, so he was only able to make and deliver 250 pairs of shoes by the deadline. Bansi was understandably upset and demanded compensation for the missing 100 pairs of shoes.
Atul apologized for the delay and offered to either refund the cost of the missing 100 pairs of shoes or to deliver them as soon as possible with no extra charge. Bansi was satisfied with the offer of the refund and agreed to it.
Atul learned from this experience and made sure to plan for potential delays in future contracts. He also made a point to communicate with his clients throughout the process to avoid any surprises or misunderstandings.
Atul apologized for the delay and offered to either refund the cost of the missing 100 pairs of shoes or to deliver them as soon as possible with no extra charge. Bansi was satisfied with the offer of the refund and agreed to it.
Atul learned from this experience and made sure to plan for potential delays in future contracts. He also made a point to communicate with his clients throughout the process to avoid any surprises or misunderstandings.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1st...
Because the contract cannot be discharged by strikes and lockouts unless it is specifically provided by the contract there is only a difficulty in performance due to the strikes made by Atul employees which cannot be a good ground of supervening impossibility to discharge of contract therefore Atul is liable to Bansi
Attention CA Foundation Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CA Foundation study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CA Foundation.
|
Explore Courses for CA Foundation exam
|
|
Similar CA Foundation Doubts
Top Courses for CA FoundationView all
Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CA Foundation 2024 is part of CA Foundation preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CA Foundation exam syllabus. Information about Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CA Foundation 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CA Foundation 2024 is part of CA Foundation preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CA Foundation exam syllabus. Information about Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CA Foundation 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CA Foundation.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CA Foundation Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CA Foundation tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CA Foundation exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup