Question Description
Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CA Foundation 2024 is part of CA Foundation preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared
according to
the CA Foundation exam syllabus. Information about Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CA Foundation 2024 Exam.
Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CA Foundation.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CA Foundation Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Atul contracted to make and deliver 350 pairs of shoes to Bansi by 1stJanuary. A strike of Atul’s employees prevented him from fulfilling his contract. In a suit by Bansi for breach of contract, Atul claimed that the contract was terminated by impossibility of performance. Was his defence good?a)No, Atul is liable to Bansi for damagesb)Yes, doctrine of supervening impossibility appliesc)Yes, doctrine of frustration will applyd)Option(b) but not (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CA Foundation tests.