Method of Data Collection in Rail Accidents

Indirect Interview is the Appropriate Method

Rail accidents are unfortunate incidents that can lead to loss of life and property. In the event of a rail accident, it is essential to collect data to determine the cause of the accident and take necessary measures to prevent future occurrences. Data collection can be done through various methods, but the appropriate method in case of rail accidents is indirect interview.

What is an Indirect Interview?

Indirect interview is a method of data collection whereby information is obtained from sources other than the direct respondent. In the case of rail accidents, indirect interview involves collecting data from witnesses, experts, and other relevant sources.

Advantages of Indirect Interview in Rail Accidents

1. Access to Reliable Information - Indirect interview provides access to reliable information from witnesses, experts, and other relevant sources. This information can help in determining the cause of the accident and taking necessary measures to prevent future occurrences.

2. Saves Time and Resources - Indirect interview saves time and resources compared to personal or direct interviews. This is because data can be collected from multiple sources at the same time, reducing the time and resources required for data collection.

3. Less Invasive - Indirect interview is less invasive compared to personal or direct interviews. This is because respondents are not directly involved in the data collection process, reducing the risk of bias and errors.

Conclusion

In conclusion, indirect interview is the appropriate method of data collection in the event of a rail accident. It provides access to reliable information, saves time and resources, and is less invasive. Collecting data through indirect interview can help in determining the cause of the accident and taking necessary measures to prevent future occurrences.

Indirect direct interview because we cannot collect information from injured or died persons