Question Description
An employee Mr. Elvish Yadav signed a contract with his employer company Kingfisher Limited that hewill not solicit the customers after leaving the employment from the company. But after Mr. Elvish left ABCLimited, he started up his own company Big Boss Limited and he started soliciting the customers ofKingfisher Limited for his own business purposes. Kingfisher Limited filed a case against Mr. Elvish forbreach of the employment contract and for soliciting their customers for own business. Mr. Elvish contendedthat there is corporate veil between him, and his company and he should not be personally held liable forthis. In this context, the company Kingfisher Limited seek your advice as to the meaning of corporate veiland when the veil can be lifted to make the owners liable for the acts done by a company? for CA Foundation 2024 is part of CA Foundation preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared
according to
the CA Foundation exam syllabus. Information about An employee Mr. Elvish Yadav signed a contract with his employer company Kingfisher Limited that hewill not solicit the customers after leaving the employment from the company. But after Mr. Elvish left ABCLimited, he started up his own company Big Boss Limited and he started soliciting the customers ofKingfisher Limited for his own business purposes. Kingfisher Limited filed a case against Mr. Elvish forbreach of the employment contract and for soliciting their customers for own business. Mr. Elvish contendedthat there is corporate veil between him, and his company and he should not be personally held liable forthis. In this context, the company Kingfisher Limited seek your advice as to the meaning of corporate veiland when the veil can be lifted to make the owners liable for the acts done by a company? covers all topics & solutions for CA Foundation 2024 Exam.
Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for An employee Mr. Elvish Yadav signed a contract with his employer company Kingfisher Limited that hewill not solicit the customers after leaving the employment from the company. But after Mr. Elvish left ABCLimited, he started up his own company Big Boss Limited and he started soliciting the customers ofKingfisher Limited for his own business purposes. Kingfisher Limited filed a case against Mr. Elvish forbreach of the employment contract and for soliciting their customers for own business. Mr. Elvish contendedthat there is corporate veil between him, and his company and he should not be personally held liable forthis. In this context, the company Kingfisher Limited seek your advice as to the meaning of corporate veiland when the veil can be lifted to make the owners liable for the acts done by a company?.
Solutions for An employee Mr. Elvish Yadav signed a contract with his employer company Kingfisher Limited that hewill not solicit the customers after leaving the employment from the company. But after Mr. Elvish left ABCLimited, he started up his own company Big Boss Limited and he started soliciting the customers ofKingfisher Limited for his own business purposes. Kingfisher Limited filed a case against Mr. Elvish forbreach of the employment contract and for soliciting their customers for own business. Mr. Elvish contendedthat there is corporate veil between him, and his company and he should not be personally held liable forthis. In this context, the company Kingfisher Limited seek your advice as to the meaning of corporate veiland when the veil can be lifted to make the owners liable for the acts done by a company? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CA Foundation.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CA Foundation Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of An employee Mr. Elvish Yadav signed a contract with his employer company Kingfisher Limited that hewill not solicit the customers after leaving the employment from the company. But after Mr. Elvish left ABCLimited, he started up his own company Big Boss Limited and he started soliciting the customers ofKingfisher Limited for his own business purposes. Kingfisher Limited filed a case against Mr. Elvish forbreach of the employment contract and for soliciting their customers for own business. Mr. Elvish contendedthat there is corporate veil between him, and his company and he should not be personally held liable forthis. In this context, the company Kingfisher Limited seek your advice as to the meaning of corporate veiland when the veil can be lifted to make the owners liable for the acts done by a company? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
An employee Mr. Elvish Yadav signed a contract with his employer company Kingfisher Limited that hewill not solicit the customers after leaving the employment from the company. But after Mr. Elvish left ABCLimited, he started up his own company Big Boss Limited and he started soliciting the customers ofKingfisher Limited for his own business purposes. Kingfisher Limited filed a case against Mr. Elvish forbreach of the employment contract and for soliciting their customers for own business. Mr. Elvish contendedthat there is corporate veil between him, and his company and he should not be personally held liable forthis. In this context, the company Kingfisher Limited seek your advice as to the meaning of corporate veiland when the veil can be lifted to make the owners liable for the acts done by a company?, a detailed solution for An employee Mr. Elvish Yadav signed a contract with his employer company Kingfisher Limited that hewill not solicit the customers after leaving the employment from the company. But after Mr. Elvish left ABCLimited, he started up his own company Big Boss Limited and he started soliciting the customers ofKingfisher Limited for his own business purposes. Kingfisher Limited filed a case against Mr. Elvish forbreach of the employment contract and for soliciting their customers for own business. Mr. Elvish contendedthat there is corporate veil between him, and his company and he should not be personally held liable forthis. In this context, the company Kingfisher Limited seek your advice as to the meaning of corporate veiland when the veil can be lifted to make the owners liable for the acts done by a company? has been provided alongside types of An employee Mr. Elvish Yadav signed a contract with his employer company Kingfisher Limited that hewill not solicit the customers after leaving the employment from the company. But after Mr. Elvish left ABCLimited, he started up his own company Big Boss Limited and he started soliciting the customers ofKingfisher Limited for his own business purposes. Kingfisher Limited filed a case against Mr. Elvish forbreach of the employment contract and for soliciting their customers for own business. Mr. Elvish contendedthat there is corporate veil between him, and his company and he should not be personally held liable forthis. In this context, the company Kingfisher Limited seek your advice as to the meaning of corporate veiland when the veil can be lifted to make the owners liable for the acts done by a company? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice An employee Mr. Elvish Yadav signed a contract with his employer company Kingfisher Limited that hewill not solicit the customers after leaving the employment from the company. But after Mr. Elvish left ABCLimited, he started up his own company Big Boss Limited and he started soliciting the customers ofKingfisher Limited for his own business purposes. Kingfisher Limited filed a case against Mr. Elvish forbreach of the employment contract and for soliciting their customers for own business. Mr. Elvish contendedthat there is corporate veil between him, and his company and he should not be personally held liable forthis. In this context, the company Kingfisher Limited seek your advice as to the meaning of corporate veiland when the veil can be lifted to make the owners liable for the acts done by a company? tests, examples and also practice CA Foundation tests.