Direction: In the following question, assume the given information to ...
Understanding the Statements
We have the following relationships from the statements:
- N ≤ K < />
- J > L > G
- M < l="" />< />
From these, we can deduce the following:
- Since N ≤ K < j,="" we="" know="" that="" k="" is="" greater="" than="" or="" equal="" to="" n="" and="" less="" than="" />
- J is greater than both L and G, indicating that J is the greatest among these variables.
- M is less than L, which in turn is less than both N and K.
Analyzing the Conclusions
Now let's evaluate the conclusions one by one.
Conclusion I: K > L
- From N ≤ K, we know that K is at least equal to N.
- Since L < n="" (from="" m="" />< l="" />< n),="" it="" follows="" that="" k="" must="" be="" greater="" than="" l.="" />
- Therefore, Conclusion I is valid.
Conclusion II: G > M
- From the statements, we know G < l="" (because="" l="" /> G).
- Additionally, since M < l,="" we="" cannot="" directly="" compare="" g="" and="" m="" without="" further="" information.="" />
- There is no direct relationship established that confirms G > M, making Conclusion II not valid.
Final Evaluation
- Since only Conclusion I is valid, the correct answer is option A: Only conclusion I follows.
This logical deduction confirms the relationships among the variables based on the provided statements.
Direction: In the following question, assume the given information to ...
By combining all the statements we get:
M < L < N ≤ K < J; J > L > G
Checking C1: K > L
Here, M < L < N ≤ K < J, so K > L.
Therefore, C1 follows.
Checking C2: G > M
Here, M < L > G, so no relation is possible because of opposite sign between them.
Therefore, C2 doesn’t follow.
Hence, Option A is correct.