Which cannot directly cause a thread to stop executing?a)Calling the S...
Option C is correct. notify() - wakes up a single thread that is waiting on this object's monitor.
Which cannot directly cause a thread to stop executing?a)Calling the S...
Understanding Thread Behavior in Java
In Java, thread management is crucial for efficient multitasking. The question pertains to what actions can directly stop a thread from executing. Let's analyze the options provided:
Option A: SetPriority() Method
- This method allows you to set the priority of a thread, influencing its scheduling. However, it does not directly stop a thread from executing; it merely affects the order in which threads are run.
Option B: wait() Method
- The `wait()` method causes the current thread to wait until another thread invokes `notify()` or `notifyAll()` on the same object. While this does pause the thread, it doesn't stop it permanently; the thread can resume when notified.
Option C: notify() Method
- The `notify()` method wakes up a single thread that is waiting on an object's monitor. It does not directly stop a thread; rather, it allows a waiting thread to continue executing. Therefore, this option is indeed the correct answer as it does not directly cause any thread to stop.
Option D: read() Method on InputStream
- The `read()` method can block a thread until data is available, but it doesn’t inherently stop the thread. It simply pauses it until it can proceed.
Conclusion
In summary, the `notify()` method does not inherently cause a thread to stop executing, making it the right answer. Understanding these nuances is key to mastering thread management in Java.