Direction: Study the following instructions carefully and then answer ...
Understanding the Arguments
In evaluating whether all annual examinations up to Std. V should be abolished, we need to analyze the strength of the arguments presented.
Argument I: Strong Argument
- The first argument supports abolishing examinations by stating that:
- Young students should not face the burden of examinations.
- Such pressures can hinder their natural development and growth.
This argument is strong because it emphasizes the psychological and developmental needs of children, advocating for a more supportive learning environment.
Argument II: Strong Argument
- The second argument opposes the abolition of examinations, highlighting:
- If students are granted automatic promotion, they may not take their studies seriously.
- This could have detrimental effects on their future academic performance.
This argument is also strong as it addresses the potential long-term consequences of removing examinations, emphasizing the importance of accountability in education.
Conclusion: Both Arguments Hold Weight
- Both arguments present valid points:
- Argument I focuses on the immediate well-being and growth of young learners.
- Argument II stresses the importance of maintaining educational standards for future success.
Thus, the correct response that both arguments are significant in their perspectives reinforces the idea that educational policies must balance the emotional and developmental needs of students with the necessity of fostering a serious attitude towards learning. Hence, the conclusion that both arguments are strong is justified.
Direction: Study the following instructions carefully and then answer ...
Clearly, neither the students can be burdened with studies at such a tender age, nor can they be left free to take studies casually, as this shall weaken their basic foundation. So, both the argument follow.