Directions : In each of the following questions a statement is given, ...
Understanding the Statements
The provided statements are:
- Statement 1: Only good singers are invited to the conference.
- Statement 2: No one without a sweet voice is a good singer.
These statements help us deduce certain conclusions about the relationship between good singers, sweet voices, and conference invitations.
Analyzing the Conclusions
The conclusions drawn from the statements are:
- Conclusion I: All invited singers in the conference have sweet voices.
- Conclusion II: Those singers who do not have sweet voices are not invited to the conference.
Validity of Conclusion I
- Since "only good singers are invited" and "no one without a sweet voice is a good singer," we can infer:
- All good singers must have sweet voices.
- Hence, all singers invited to the conference (who are good singers) must possess a sweet voice.
Thus, Conclusion I is valid.
Validity of Conclusion II
- The second conclusion states that singers who lack sweet voices are not invited.
- Given that only good singers (who must have sweet voices) are invited, it follows logically that any singer without a sweet voice cannot be a good singer and therefore cannot be invited.
Thus, Conclusion II is also valid.
Final Evaluation
Both conclusions logically follow from the statements provided:
- Conclusion I is true because invited singers are good singers, and all good singers have sweet voices.
- Conclusion II is true because singers without sweet voices cannot be good singers and, therefore, cannot be invited.
Correct Answer
Since both conclusions are valid, the correct answer is option 'D': Both I and II follow.
Directions : In each of the following questions a statement is given, ...
The statement asserts that a good singer always has a sweet voice and only good singers are invited in the conference. This implies that all those invited in the conference have sweet voice and those who do not have sweet voice are not invited. So, both I and II follow.