Directions to SolveBelow in each of the questions are given two statem...
Since in the past the result was declared late by university, it has decided to conduct the examination in March/April in order to announce the result at proper time.
View all questions of this test
Directions to SolveBelow in each of the questions are given two statem...
Understanding the Relationship between the Statements
To analyze the relationship between the given statements, let's break them down:
Statement I: The university officers have decided to conduct the last examination every year in March/April to announce the results on time.
Statement II: In the past, the result was declared late by the University due to the lack of the number of examiners.
Analysis of the Statements
- Causation:
- Statement I is a proactive measure taken by the university to ensure timely results.
- Statement II highlights a past issue, specifically the delays in result declaration caused by a shortage of examiners.
- Cause and Effect:
- The decision in Statement I (to conduct exams earlier) is a direct response to the problem outlined in Statement II (the past delays due to insufficient examiners).
- This indicates that the university's actions are influenced by previous experiences.
Conclusion
Based on the analysis of both statements, we see that:
- Statement II serves as a backdrop for the decision made in Statement I. The university is addressing the consequences of past delays (Statement II) by changing their examination schedule (Statement I).
Therefore, the correct answer is:
Option B: If statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect.
This relationship illustrates how past issues can influence current decision-making processes in an organization.