The priests divided people into four groups, called varnas. Acording to them, each varna had a different set of functions. The priests also said that these groups were decided on the basis of birth. Many people did not accept the system of varna laid down by the brahmins. Some people felt that there should be no differences amongst people based on occupation.  

Opposition to the System of Varnas

Introduction:
The system of Varnas, also known as the caste system, is a social hierarchy that originated in ancient India. It divided society into four main groups, namely Brahmins (priests and scholars), Kshatriyas (warriors and rulers), Vaishyas (merchants and farmers), and Shudras (laborers and servants). However, this system faced significant opposition due to various reasons.

1. Social Inequality:
One of the primary reasons for opposing the Varnas system was the social inequality it perpetuated. The system classified individuals into fixed castes based on birth, denying them the opportunity for upward social mobility. This rigid structure led to discrimination and oppressed those belonging to lower castes. The inherent inequality in the system went against the principles of justice and equality.

2. Discrimination and Untouchability:
Within the Varnas system, the lowest caste, known as the Shudras, faced severe discrimination and were considered impure. They were subjected to various social and economic restrictions and were even deemed untouchable. This practice of untouchability, whereby individuals from higher castes would avoid physical contact with those from lower castes, led to the marginalization and dehumanization of a significant portion of the population.

3. Occupational Constraints:
The Varnas system also imposed occupational restrictions on individuals based on their caste. Each caste was assigned specific occupations, and individuals were expected to adhere to these roles regardless of their skills or interests. This limited people's options and hindered their ability to pursue professions of their choice. The lack of freedom in choosing one's occupation was seen as a violation of individual rights and aspirations.

4. Lack of Meritocracy:
Another criticism of the Varnas system was its failure to promote meritocracy. The system emphasized birth-based hierarchy rather than individual capabilities and qualifications. This hindered social progress and innovation as individuals were not given equal opportunities to excel based on their abilities. The talent and potential of individuals from lower castes were often overlooked, leading to a loss of human capital for society as a whole.

5. Social Stagnation:
The caste system also contributed to social stagnation and hindered social mobility. The rigid hierarchy and lack of upward mobility opportunities prevented the development of a dynamic and progressive society. It created a status quo where individuals were confined to their caste-based roles, limiting their personal growth and hindering societal development.

Conclusion:
The opposition to the Varnas system stemmed from its perpetuation of social inequality, discrimination, and limited opportunities for individuals. The system's rigid structure, lack of meritocracy, and occupational constraints were seen as obstacles to social progress and individual freedom. Over time, these criticisms have led to efforts to reform and challenge the caste system, aiming for a more inclusive and equitable society.

Why did the people opposethe system of varnas? class 6