Question Description
Arun was asked to divide 1469 by a certain number. However, instead of 1469, Arun divided 1677 by that number. As a result, the quotient turned out to be 16 more than the correct answer. What was the quotient obtained by Arun? (Assume no remainder in both the cases).Correct answer is '129'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Arun was asked to divide 1469 by a certain number. However, instead of 1469, Arun divided 1677 by that number. As a result, the quotient turned out to be 16 more than the correct answer. What was the quotient obtained by Arun? (Assume no remainder in both the cases).Correct answer is '129'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Arun was asked to divide 1469 by a certain number. However, instead of 1469, Arun divided 1677 by that number. As a result, the quotient turned out to be 16 more than the correct answer. What was the quotient obtained by Arun? (Assume no remainder in both the cases).Correct answer is '129'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Arun was asked to divide 1469 by a certain number. However, instead of 1469, Arun divided 1677 by that number. As a result, the quotient turned out to be 16 more than the correct answer. What was the quotient obtained by Arun? (Assume no remainder in both the cases).Correct answer is '129'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Arun was asked to divide 1469 by a certain number. However, instead of 1469, Arun divided 1677 by that number. As a result, the quotient turned out to be 16 more than the correct answer. What was the quotient obtained by Arun? (Assume no remainder in both the cases).Correct answer is '129'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Arun was asked to divide 1469 by a certain number. However, instead of 1469, Arun divided 1677 by that number. As a result, the quotient turned out to be 16 more than the correct answer. What was the quotient obtained by Arun? (Assume no remainder in both the cases).Correct answer is '129'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Arun was asked to divide 1469 by a certain number. However, instead of 1469, Arun divided 1677 by that number. As a result, the quotient turned out to be 16 more than the correct answer. What was the quotient obtained by Arun? (Assume no remainder in both the cases).Correct answer is '129'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Arun was asked to divide 1469 by a certain number. However, instead of 1469, Arun divided 1677 by that number. As a result, the quotient turned out to be 16 more than the correct answer. What was the quotient obtained by Arun? (Assume no remainder in both the cases).Correct answer is '129'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Arun was asked to divide 1469 by a certain number. However, instead of 1469, Arun divided 1677 by that number. As a result, the quotient turned out to be 16 more than the correct answer. What was the quotient obtained by Arun? (Assume no remainder in both the cases).Correct answer is '129'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.