GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  The ratio of income of two persons is 5 : 3 a... Start Learning for Free
The ratio of income of two persons is 5 : 3 and that of their expenditures is 9 : 5. If they save Rs. 2600 and Rs. 1800 respectively. Their incomes are : 

A) Rs. 8000 : Rs. 4800 

  B) Rs. 6000 : Rs. 3600 

C) Rs. 10000 : Rs. 6000 

  D) Rs. 9000 : Rs. 5400 

Verified Answer
The ratio of income of two persons is 5 : 3 and that of their expendit...
Description for Correct answer
Let incomes of A and B are

View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
The ratio of income of two persons is 5 : 3 and that of their expendit...
Given: Ratio of A and B is 5:3

Let's assume A = 5x and B = 3x, where x is a constant.

When both A and B are increased by 6, we get:

New A = 5x + 6 and New B = 3x + 6

The new ratio of A and B can be calculated as follows:

New ratio of A and B = (5x + 6)/(3x + 6)

Simplifying the above expression, we get:

New ratio of A and B = (5/3) * [(x+2)/(x+2)]

New ratio of A and B = 5/3

Therefore, the new ratio of A and B is independent of the value of x and hence cannot be determined from the information given. Hence, the correct answer is option 'E'.
Free Test
Community Answer
The ratio of income of two persons is 5 : 3 and that of their expendit...
जो फिरौन थे
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

It is true that developments since the last war in Britain have so increased the progressive character of the income tax as to make the burden of taxation progressive throughout and that, through redistributive expenditure on subsidies and services, the income of the very lowest classes has been increased... by as much as 22 percent. But the latter development is little dependent on the present high rates of progression but is financed mainly by the contributions of the middle and upper ranges of the middle class.All arguments in support of progression can be used to justify any degree of progression. Its advocates may realize that beyond a certain point the adverse effects on the efficiency of the economic system may become so serious as to make it inexpedient to push it any further. But the argument based on the presumed justice of progression provides for no limitation, as has often been admitted by its supporters, before all incomes above a certain figure are confiscated and those below left untaxed. Unlike proportionality, progression provides no principle that tells us what the relative burden of different persons ought to be. It is no more than a rejection of proportionality in favor of a discrimination against the wealthy without any criterion for limiting the extent of this discrimination. Because there is no real rate of progression that can be demonstrated by formula, it is only the newness of the principle that has prevented its being carried at once to punitive rates. But there is no reason why a little more than before should not always be represented as just and reasonable.It is the great merit of proportional taxation that it provides a rule which is likely to be agreed upon by those who will pay absolutely more and those who will pay absolutely less and which, once accepted, raises no problem of a separate rule applying only to a minority. Even if progressive taxation does not name the individuals to be taxed at a higher rate, it discriminates by introducing a distinction that aims at shifting the burden from those who determine the rates onto others. In no sense can a progressive scale of taxation be regarded as a general rule applicable equally to all. In no sense can it be said that a tax of 20 percent on one persons income and a tax of 75 percent on the larger income of another person are equal. Progression provides no criterion whatever of what is and what is not to be regarded as just. It indicates no halting point for its application, and the good judgment of the people on which its defenders are usually driven to rely as the only safeguard is nothing more than the current state of opinion shaped by past policy.Q.Which of the following is an effect of the progressive-income tax?

Top Courses for GMAT

The ratio of income of two persons is 5 : 3 and that of their expenditures is 9 : 5. If they save Rs. 2600 and Rs. 1800 respectively. Their incomes are :A) Rs. 8000 : Rs. 4800 B) Rs. 6000 : Rs. 3600C) Rs. 10000 : Rs. 6000 D) Rs. 9000 : Rs. 5400
Question Description
The ratio of income of two persons is 5 : 3 and that of their expenditures is 9 : 5. If they save Rs. 2600 and Rs. 1800 respectively. Their incomes are :A) Rs. 8000 : Rs. 4800 B) Rs. 6000 : Rs. 3600C) Rs. 10000 : Rs. 6000 D) Rs. 9000 : Rs. 5400 for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The ratio of income of two persons is 5 : 3 and that of their expenditures is 9 : 5. If they save Rs. 2600 and Rs. 1800 respectively. Their incomes are :A) Rs. 8000 : Rs. 4800 B) Rs. 6000 : Rs. 3600C) Rs. 10000 : Rs. 6000 D) Rs. 9000 : Rs. 5400 covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The ratio of income of two persons is 5 : 3 and that of their expenditures is 9 : 5. If they save Rs. 2600 and Rs. 1800 respectively. Their incomes are :A) Rs. 8000 : Rs. 4800 B) Rs. 6000 : Rs. 3600C) Rs. 10000 : Rs. 6000 D) Rs. 9000 : Rs. 5400.
Solutions for The ratio of income of two persons is 5 : 3 and that of their expenditures is 9 : 5. If they save Rs. 2600 and Rs. 1800 respectively. Their incomes are :A) Rs. 8000 : Rs. 4800 B) Rs. 6000 : Rs. 3600C) Rs. 10000 : Rs. 6000 D) Rs. 9000 : Rs. 5400 in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The ratio of income of two persons is 5 : 3 and that of their expenditures is 9 : 5. If they save Rs. 2600 and Rs. 1800 respectively. Their incomes are :A) Rs. 8000 : Rs. 4800 B) Rs. 6000 : Rs. 3600C) Rs. 10000 : Rs. 6000 D) Rs. 9000 : Rs. 5400 defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The ratio of income of two persons is 5 : 3 and that of their expenditures is 9 : 5. If they save Rs. 2600 and Rs. 1800 respectively. Their incomes are :A) Rs. 8000 : Rs. 4800 B) Rs. 6000 : Rs. 3600C) Rs. 10000 : Rs. 6000 D) Rs. 9000 : Rs. 5400, a detailed solution for The ratio of income of two persons is 5 : 3 and that of their expenditures is 9 : 5. If they save Rs. 2600 and Rs. 1800 respectively. Their incomes are :A) Rs. 8000 : Rs. 4800 B) Rs. 6000 : Rs. 3600C) Rs. 10000 : Rs. 6000 D) Rs. 9000 : Rs. 5400 has been provided alongside types of The ratio of income of two persons is 5 : 3 and that of their expenditures is 9 : 5. If they save Rs. 2600 and Rs. 1800 respectively. Their incomes are :A) Rs. 8000 : Rs. 4800 B) Rs. 6000 : Rs. 3600C) Rs. 10000 : Rs. 6000 D) Rs. 9000 : Rs. 5400 theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The ratio of income of two persons is 5 : 3 and that of their expenditures is 9 : 5. If they save Rs. 2600 and Rs. 1800 respectively. Their incomes are :A) Rs. 8000 : Rs. 4800 B) Rs. 6000 : Rs. 3600C) Rs. 10000 : Rs. 6000 D) Rs. 9000 : Rs. 5400 tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev