All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Class 9 Exam  >  Class 9 Questions  >  How far it is correct to say that the governm... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
How far it is correct to say that the government of PRI in Mexico was a non-democratic government ?
Clear all your Class 9 doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
How far it is correct to say that the government of PRI in Mexico was ...
However, it is important to note that the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) in Mexico was in power for over 70 years, from 1929 to 2000, and during this time, there were several instances of authoritarianism, corruption, and election fraud. While some argue that the PRI did bring stability and economic growth to the country, others view their rule as undemocratic and oppressive, with limited political freedom and human rights violations. Ultimately, the assessment of the PRI's government as democratic or non-democratic may depend on one's perspective and interpretation of history and politics.
Community Answer
How far it is correct to say that the government of PRI in Mexico was ...
We know that Mexico is a country between U.S and central America. From Mexico's independence 1930 to 2000 ,Mexico ruled by the strong central power and have limited political freedom minded Revolutionary Party (PRI), a central political grouping infamous for imposing a social order which depends on relations of patronage . Though its bad behaviour rule were a likely to give a false impression democratic disguise, with all of its forms and trappings conveyed through elections and campaigns. Included in the injustices promoted by the PRI through manipulation of the voting system, the party also dominated Mexico’s politics on both the national and state levels. Thus, We can say that the government of PRI in Mexico was non-democratic.
Attention Class 9 Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Class 9 study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Class 9.
Explore Courses for Class 9 exam

Similar Class 9 Doubts

Read the source given below and answer the questions that follow:China’s famine of 1958–1961 was the worst recorded famine in world history. Nearly, three crore people died in this famine. During those days, India’s economic condition was not much better than China. Yet, India did not have a famine of the kind China had. Economists think that this was a result of different government policies in the two countries. The existence of democracy in India made the Indian Government respond to food scarcity in a way that the Chinese government did not. They point out that no large-scale famine has ever taken place in an independent and democratic country. If China too had multiparty elections, an opposition party and a press free to criticise the government, then so many people may not have died in the famine. This example brings out one of the reasons why democracy is considered the best form of government. Democracy is better than any other form of government in responding to the needs of the people. A non-democratic government may and can respond to the people’s needs, but it all depends on the wishes of the people who rule. If the rulers don’t want to, they don’t have to act according to the wishes of the people. A democracy requires that the rulers have to attend to the needs of the people. A democratic government is a better government because it is a more accountable form of government.Q. When did the worst famine strike China?

Read the source given below and answer the questions that follow:China’s famine of 1958–1961 was the worst recorded famine in world history. Nearly, three crore people died in this famine. During those days, India’s economic condition was not much better than China. Yet, India did not have a famine of the kind China had. Economists think that this was a result of different government policies in the two countries. The existence of democracy in India made the Indian Government respond to food scarcity in a way that the Chinese government did not. They point out that no large-scale famine has ever taken place in an independent and democratic country. If China too had multiparty elections, an opposition party and a press free to criticise the government, then so many people may not have died in the famine. This example brings out one of the reasons why democracy is considered the best form of government. Democracy is better than any other form of government in responding to the needs of the people. A non-democratic government may and can respond to the people’s needs, but it all depends on the wishes of the people who rule. If the rulers don’t want to, they don’t have to act according to the wishes of the people. A democracy requires that the rulers have to attend to the needs of the people. A democratic government is a better government because it is a more accountable form of government.Q. During those days, how was the economic condition of India?

Read the source given below and answer the questions that follow:China’s famine of 1958–1961 was the worst recorded famine in world history. Nearly, three crore people died in this famine. During those days, India’s economic condition was not much better than China. Yet, India did not have a famine of the kind China had. Economists think that this was a result of different government policies in the two countries. The existence of democracy in India made the Indian Government respond to food scarcity in a way that the Chinese government did not. They point out that no large-scale famine has ever taken place in an independent and democratic country. If China too had multiparty elections, an opposition party and a press free to criticise the government, then so many people may not have died in the famine. This example brings out one of the reasons why democracy is considered the best form of government. Democracy is better than any other form of government in responding to the needs of the people. A non-democratic government may and can respond to the people’s needs, but it all depends on the wishes of the people who rule. If the rulers don’t want to, they don’t have to act according to the wishes of the people. A democracy requires that the rulers have to attend to the needs of the people. A democratic government is a better government because it is a more accountable form of government.Q. A democratic government is better than any other government because it is

Question No. 53 to 58 are based on the given text. Read the text carefully and answer the questions:Zimbabwe attained independence from White minority rule in 1980. Since then the country has been ruled by ZANU-PF, the party that led the freedom struggle. Its leader, Robert Mugabe, ruled the country since independence. Elections were held regularly and always won by ZANU-PF. President Mugabe was popular but also used unfair practices in elections. Over the years his government changed the constitution several times to increase the powers of the President and make him less accountable.Opposition party workers were harassed and their meetings disrupted. Public protests and demonstrations against the government were declared illegal. There was a law that limited the right to criticise the President. Television and radio were controlled by the government and gave only the ruling party’s version. There were independent newspapers but the government harassed those journalists who went against it. The government ignored some court judgments that went against it and pressurised judges. He was forced out of office in 2017. The example of Zimbabwe shows thatpopular approval of the rulers is necessary for a democracy, but it is not sufficient. Popular governments can be undemocratic. Popular leaders can be autocratic. If we wish to assess a democracy, it is important to look at the elections. But it is equally important to look before and after the elections. There should be sufficient room for normal political activity, including political opposition, in the period before elections. This requires that the state should respect some basic rights of the citizen. They should be free to think, to have opinions, to express these in public, to form associations, to protest and take other political actions. Everyone should be equal in the eyes of law. These rights must be protected by an independent judiciary whose orders are obeyed by everyone.Q.Does the given source explain the significance of which feature of democracy?

Top Courses for Class 9View all

Top Courses for Class 9

How far it is correct to say that the government of PRI in Mexico was a non-democratic government ? Related: Subjective Question & Answers - What is Democracy? Why Democracy?, Social Science Class 9
Question Description
How far it is correct to say that the government of PRI in Mexico was a non-democratic government ? Related: Subjective Question & Answers - What is Democracy? Why Democracy?, Social Science Class 9 for Class 9 2024 is part of Class 9 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 9 exam syllabus. Information about How far it is correct to say that the government of PRI in Mexico was a non-democratic government ? Related: Subjective Question & Answers - What is Democracy? Why Democracy?, Social Science Class 9 covers all topics & solutions for Class 9 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for How far it is correct to say that the government of PRI in Mexico was a non-democratic government ? Related: Subjective Question & Answers - What is Democracy? Why Democracy?, Social Science Class 9.
Solutions for How far it is correct to say that the government of PRI in Mexico was a non-democratic government ? Related: Subjective Question & Answers - What is Democracy? Why Democracy?, Social Science Class 9 in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 9. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 9 Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of How far it is correct to say that the government of PRI in Mexico was a non-democratic government ? Related: Subjective Question & Answers - What is Democracy? Why Democracy?, Social Science Class 9 defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of How far it is correct to say that the government of PRI in Mexico was a non-democratic government ? Related: Subjective Question & Answers - What is Democracy? Why Democracy?, Social Science Class 9, a detailed solution for How far it is correct to say that the government of PRI in Mexico was a non-democratic government ? Related: Subjective Question & Answers - What is Democracy? Why Democracy?, Social Science Class 9 has been provided alongside types of How far it is correct to say that the government of PRI in Mexico was a non-democratic government ? Related: Subjective Question & Answers - What is Democracy? Why Democracy?, Social Science Class 9 theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice How far it is correct to say that the government of PRI in Mexico was a non-democratic government ? Related: Subjective Question & Answers - What is Democracy? Why Democracy?, Social Science Class 9 tests, examples and also practice Class 9 tests.
Explore Courses for Class 9 exam

Top Courses for Class 9

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup