All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  The security personnel of a leading employmen... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
The security personnel of a leading employment organization insisted on developing a new system of allotting the unique ID numbers to its employees to prevent the tampering of ID numbers by any of the unscrupulous members. They insisted that the 10 digit number must include all the numbers from 0-9 exactly once. Further, all the ID numbers should also be exactly divisible by all the numbers from 1-9.
The largest ID number that could be generated using this system is: 3
  • a)
    9876543210
  • b)
    9876351240
  • c)
    9864751320
  • d)
    None of these
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CAT doubts with EduRev
Verified Answer
The security personnel of a leading employment organization insisted o...
To find the largest ID number, start with 987654***0.
The largest possible ID number is 9876351240.
Hence, option 2.
This question is part of UPSC exam. View all CAT courses
Most Upvoted Answer
The security personnel of a leading employment organization insisted o...
To find the largest ID number, start with 987654***0.
The largest possible ID number is 9876351240.
Hence, option 2.
Community Answer
The security personnel of a leading employment organization insisted o...
We have to eliminate the numbers by thinking of divisibilities of 4 , 8 then we we get to the 2 choices b,c then we check for 7 divisibility 
or .
we have  to look for multiple of 9 factorial 

Attention CAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

When people react to their experiences with particular authorities, those authorities and the organizations or institutions that they represent often benefit if the people involved begin with high levels of commitment to the organization or institution represented by the authorities. First, in his studies of people's attitudes toward political and legal institutions, Tyler found that attitudes after an experience with the institution were strongly affected by prior attitudes. Single experiences influence post experience loyalty but certainly do not overwhelm the relationship between pre-experience and post experience loyalty. Thus, the best predictor of loyalty after an experience is usually loyalty before that experience. Second, people with prior loyalty to the organization or institution judge their dealings with the organization's or institution's authorities to be fairer than do those with less prior loyalty, either because they are more fairly treated or because they interpret equivalent treatment as fairer.Although high levels of prior organizational or institutional commitment are generally beneficial to the organization or institution, under certain conditions high levels of prior commitment may actually sow the seeds of reduced commitment. When previously committed individuals feel that they were treated unfavourably or unfairly during some experience with the organization or institution, they may show an especially sharp decline in commitment. Two studies were designed to test this hypothesis, which, if confirmed, would suggest that organizational or institutional commitment has risks, as well as benefits. At least three psychological models offer predictions of how individuals' reactions may vary as a function of (1) their prior level of commitment and (2) the favorability of the encounter with the organization or institution. Favorability of the encounter is determined by the outcome of the encounter and the fairness or appropriateness of the procedures used to allocate outcomes during the encounter. First, the instrumental prediction is that because people are mainly concerned with receiving desired outcomes from their encounters with organizations, changes in their level of commitment will depend primarily on the favorability of the encounter. Second, the assimilation prediction is that individuals' prior attitudes predispose them to react in a way that is consistent with their prior attitudes.The third prediction, derived from the group-value model of justice, pertains to how people with high prior commitment will react when they feel that they have been treated unfavorably or unfairly during some encounter with the organization or institution. Fair treatment by the other party symbolizes to people that they are being dealt with in a dignified and respectful way, thereby bolstering their sense of self-identity and self-worth. However, people will become quite distressed and react quite negatively if they feel that they have been treated unfairly by the other party to the relationship. The group-value model suggests that people value the information they receive that helps them to define themselves and to view themselves favorably. According to the instrumental viewpoint, people are primarily concerned with the more material or tangible resources received from the relationship. Empirical support for the group-value model has implications for a variety of important issues, including the determinants of commitment, satisfaction, organizational citizenship, and rule following. Determinants of procedural fairness include structural or interpersonal factors. For example, structural determinants refer to such things as whether decisions were made by neutral, fact-finding authorities who used legitimate decision-making criteria. The primary purpose of the study was to examine the interactive effect of individuals (1) commitment to an organization or institution prior to some encounter and (2) perceptions of how fairly they were treated during the encounter, on the change in their level of commitment. A basic assumption of the group-value model is that people generally value their relationships with people, groups, organizations, and institutions and therefore value fair treatment from the other party to the relationship. Specifically, highly committed members should have especially negative reactions to feeling that they were treated unfairly, more so than (1) less-committed group members or (2) highly committed members who felt that they were fairly treated.The prediction that people will react especially negatively when they previously felt highly committed but felt that they were treated unfairly also is consistent with the literature on psychological contracts. Rousseau suggested that, over time, the members of work organizations develop feelings of entitlement, i.e., perceived obligations that their employers have toward them. Those who are highly committed to the organization believe that they are fulfilling their contract obligations. However, if the organization acted unfairly, then highly committed individuals are likely to believe that the organization did not live up to its end of the bargain.For summarizing the passage, which of the following is most appropriate

When people react to their experiences with particular authorities, those authorities and the organizations or institutions that they represent often benefit if the people involved begin with high levels of commitment to the organization or institution represented by the authorities. First, in his studies of people's attitudes toward political and legal institutions, Tyler found that attitudes after an experience with the institution were strongly affected by prior attitudes. Single experiences influence post experience loyalty but certainly do not overwhelm the relationship between pre-experience and post experience loyalty. Thus, the best predictor of loyalty after an experience is usually loyalty before that experience.Second, people with prior loyalty to the organization or institution judge their dealings with the organization's or institution's authorities to be fairer than do those with less prior loyalty, either because they are more fairly treated or because they interpret equivalent treatment as fairer.Although high levels of prior organizational or institutional commitment are generally beneficial to the organization or institution, under certain conditions high levels of prior commitment may actually sow the seeds of reduced commitment. When previously committed individuals feel that they were treated unfavourably or unfairly during some experience with the organization or institution, they may show an especially sharp decline in commitment. Two studies were designed to test this hypothesis, which, if confirmed, would suggest that organizational or institutional commitment has risks, as well as benefits. At least three psychological models offer predictions of how individuals' reactions may vary as a function of (1) their prior level of commitment and (2) the favorability of the encounter with the organization or institution. Favorability of the encounter is determined by the outcome of the encounter and the fairness or appropriateness of the procedures used to allocate outcomes during the encounter. First, the instrumental prediction is that because people are mainly concerned with receiving desired outcomes from their encounters with organizations, changes in their level of commitment will depend primarily on the favorability of the encounter. Second, the assimilation prediction is that individuals' prior attitudes predispose them to react in a way that is consistent with their prior attitudes.The third prediction, derived from the group-value model of justice, pertains to how people with high prior commitment will react when they feel that they have been treated unfavorably or unfairly during some encounter with the organization or institution. Fair treatment by the other party symbolizes to people that they are being dealt with in a dignified and respectful way, thereby bolstering their sense of self-identity and self worth. However, people will become quite distressed and react quite negatively if they feel that they have been treated unfairly by the other party to the relationship. The group-value model suggests that people value the information they receive that helps them to define themselves and to view themselves favorably. According to the instrumental viewpoint, people are primarily concerned with the more material or tangible resources received from the relationship. Empirical support for the group-value model has implications for a variety of important issues, including the determinants of commitment, satisfaction, organizational citizenship, and rule following. Determinants of procedural fairness include structural or interpersonal factors. For example, structural determinants refer to such things as whether decisions were made by neutral, fact finding authorities who used legitimate decision making criteria. The primary purpose of the study was to examine the interactive effect of individuals (1) commitment to an organization or institution prior to some encounter and (2) perceptions of how fairly they were treated during the encounter, on the change in their level of commitment. A basic assumption of the group-value model is that people generally value their relationships with people, groups, organizations, and institutions and therefore value fair treatment from the other party to the relationship. Specifically, highly committed members should have especially negative reactions to feeling that they were treated unfairly, more so than (1) less-committed group members or (2) highly committed members who felt that they were fairly treated.The prediction that people will react especially negatively when they previously felt highly committed but felt that they were treated unfairly also is consistent with the literature on psychological contracts. Rousseau suggested that, over time, the members of work organizations develop feelings of entitlement, i.e., perceived obligations that their employers have toward them. Those who are highly committed to the organization believe that they are fulfilling their contract obligations. However, if the organization acted unfairly, then highly committed individuals are likely to believe that the organization did not live up to its end of the bargain.For summarizing the passage, which of the following is most appropriate

Top Courses for CATView all

Top Courses for CAT

The security personnel of a leading employment organization insisted on developing a new system of allotting the unique ID numbers to its employees to prevent the tampering of ID numbers by any of the unscrupulous members. They insisted that the 10 digit number must include all the numbers from 0-9 exactly once. Further, all the ID numbers should also be exactly divisible by all the numbers from 1-9.The largest ID number that could be generated using this system is: 3a)9876543210b)9876351240c)9864751320d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The security personnel of a leading employment organization insisted on developing a new system of allotting the unique ID numbers to its employees to prevent the tampering of ID numbers by any of the unscrupulous members. They insisted that the 10 digit number must include all the numbers from 0-9 exactly once. Further, all the ID numbers should also be exactly divisible by all the numbers from 1-9.The largest ID number that could be generated using this system is: 3a)9876543210b)9876351240c)9864751320d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about The security personnel of a leading employment organization insisted on developing a new system of allotting the unique ID numbers to its employees to prevent the tampering of ID numbers by any of the unscrupulous members. They insisted that the 10 digit number must include all the numbers from 0-9 exactly once. Further, all the ID numbers should also be exactly divisible by all the numbers from 1-9.The largest ID number that could be generated using this system is: 3a)9876543210b)9876351240c)9864751320d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The security personnel of a leading employment organization insisted on developing a new system of allotting the unique ID numbers to its employees to prevent the tampering of ID numbers by any of the unscrupulous members. They insisted that the 10 digit number must include all the numbers from 0-9 exactly once. Further, all the ID numbers should also be exactly divisible by all the numbers from 1-9.The largest ID number that could be generated using this system is: 3a)9876543210b)9876351240c)9864751320d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The security personnel of a leading employment organization insisted on developing a new system of allotting the unique ID numbers to its employees to prevent the tampering of ID numbers by any of the unscrupulous members. They insisted that the 10 digit number must include all the numbers from 0-9 exactly once. Further, all the ID numbers should also be exactly divisible by all the numbers from 1-9.The largest ID number that could be generated using this system is: 3a)9876543210b)9876351240c)9864751320d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The security personnel of a leading employment organization insisted on developing a new system of allotting the unique ID numbers to its employees to prevent the tampering of ID numbers by any of the unscrupulous members. They insisted that the 10 digit number must include all the numbers from 0-9 exactly once. Further, all the ID numbers should also be exactly divisible by all the numbers from 1-9.The largest ID number that could be generated using this system is: 3a)9876543210b)9876351240c)9864751320d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The security personnel of a leading employment organization insisted on developing a new system of allotting the unique ID numbers to its employees to prevent the tampering of ID numbers by any of the unscrupulous members. They insisted that the 10 digit number must include all the numbers from 0-9 exactly once. Further, all the ID numbers should also be exactly divisible by all the numbers from 1-9.The largest ID number that could be generated using this system is: 3a)9876543210b)9876351240c)9864751320d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The security personnel of a leading employment organization insisted on developing a new system of allotting the unique ID numbers to its employees to prevent the tampering of ID numbers by any of the unscrupulous members. They insisted that the 10 digit number must include all the numbers from 0-9 exactly once. Further, all the ID numbers should also be exactly divisible by all the numbers from 1-9.The largest ID number that could be generated using this system is: 3a)9876543210b)9876351240c)9864751320d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The security personnel of a leading employment organization insisted on developing a new system of allotting the unique ID numbers to its employees to prevent the tampering of ID numbers by any of the unscrupulous members. They insisted that the 10 digit number must include all the numbers from 0-9 exactly once. Further, all the ID numbers should also be exactly divisible by all the numbers from 1-9.The largest ID number that could be generated using this system is: 3a)9876543210b)9876351240c)9864751320d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The security personnel of a leading employment organization insisted on developing a new system of allotting the unique ID numbers to its employees to prevent the tampering of ID numbers by any of the unscrupulous members. They insisted that the 10 digit number must include all the numbers from 0-9 exactly once. Further, all the ID numbers should also be exactly divisible by all the numbers from 1-9.The largest ID number that could be generated using this system is: 3a)9876543210b)9876351240c)9864751320d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup