Drawback of Thomson's model of an atom?
Thomson’s atomic model explained the overall neutrality of an atom. Its assumption that the total mass of an atom is uniformly distributed all over the atom was inconsistent with some of the experimental results. Rutherford’s gold foil experiment of scattering α-particles revealed that most of the space in an atom is empty contradicted Thomson’s atomic model. Thus, it was found that the plum pudding atomic model was insufficient to explain the structure of an atom.
The limitations of Thomson’s atomic model triggered further researches for establishing the structure of an atom. The plum pudding atomic model lacked experimental evidence and hence Rutherford conducted many experiments in order to determine the structure of an atom. Log on to Byju’s YouTube channel to learn more about the Rutherford’s atomic model that came after Thomson’s atomic model failed to explain the structure of an atom.
This question is part of UPSC exam. View all Class 9 courses
Drawback of Thomson's model of an atom?
Drawback of Thomson's model of an atom:
The Thomson's model of an atom, also known as the plum pudding model, was proposed by J.J. Thomson in 1904. While this model was an important step towards understanding the structure of an atom, it had several drawbacks that were later addressed by subsequent atomic models.
Lack of a concentrated nucleus:
- According to Thomson's model, the atom consists of a positively charged sphere with negatively charged electrons embedded in it, much like the plums in a pudding.
- However, this model failed to explain the stability and lack of collapse of the atom.
- It did not account for the existence of a concentrated nucleus that contains most of the mass of the atom and positive charge.
Electron distribution:
- Thomson's model did not provide any information about the arrangement or distribution of electrons within the atom.
- It did not explain how the electrons were organized or how they moved around the atom.
- This limitation prevented a comprehensive understanding of atomic behavior and chemical properties.
Lack of explanation for spectral lines:
- The Thomson model failed to explain the observed line spectra emitted by atoms when they are excited.
- It did not account for the discrete energy levels and transitions that produce the characteristic spectral lines.
- As a result, the model could not explain the quantized nature of energy levels and the relationship between energy and electron orbits.
Violation of the laws of electrostatics:
- Thomson's model proposed that the positive and negative charges were uniformly distributed throughout the atom.
- However, this contradicted the laws of electrostatics, which state that like charges repel each other.
- If the positive charge was uniformly distributed, the electrons would be repelled and move away from the central region, causing the atom to collapse.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, while Thomson's model of an atom was a significant advancement in our understanding of atomic structure, it had several drawbacks that were later addressed by subsequent models such as Rutherford's nuclear model and Bohr's model. These models provided a more accurate representation of the atom, accounting for the concentrated positive nucleus, electron distribution, spectral lines, and the quantized nature of energy levels.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Class 9 study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Class 9.