DU LLB 2020: Past Year Question Paper with Answer Key | CLAT Past Year Papers (2008-2024) PDF Download

 Page 1


1)  
2)  
DU LLB
Topic:- LLB S2 T1
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
procedural, as distinguished from a substantive natural law. What I have called the internal morality of law is in this sense a
procedural version of natural law, though to avoid misunderstanding the word ‘procedural’ should be assigned a special and
expanded sense so that it would include, for example, a substantive accord between official action and enacted law. The
term ‘procedural’ is, however, broadly appropriate as indicating that we are concerned, not with the substantive aims of
legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and
administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be.
The passage is an explanation of….
1. Legal Morality
2. The Worship of God
3. Natural Law
4. God’s Law
Choose the correct option from below.
1. 1,2,3 & 4
2. 1 and 3 only
3. 2 and 3 only
4. 3 only
Correct Answer :-
1 and 3 only
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
Page 2


1)  
2)  
DU LLB
Topic:- LLB S2 T1
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
procedural, as distinguished from a substantive natural law. What I have called the internal morality of law is in this sense a
procedural version of natural law, though to avoid misunderstanding the word ‘procedural’ should be assigned a special and
expanded sense so that it would include, for example, a substantive accord between official action and enacted law. The
term ‘procedural’ is, however, broadly appropriate as indicating that we are concerned, not with the substantive aims of
legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and
administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be.
The passage is an explanation of….
1. Legal Morality
2. The Worship of God
3. Natural Law
4. God’s Law
Choose the correct option from below.
1. 1,2,3 & 4
2. 1 and 3 only
3. 2 and 3 only
4. 3 only
Correct Answer :-
1 and 3 only
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
3)  
procedural, as distinguished from a substantive natural law. What I have called the internal morality of law is in this sense a
procedural version of natural law, though to avoid misunderstanding the word ‘procedural’ should be assigned a special and
expanded sense so that it would include, for example, a substantive accord between official action and enacted law. The
term ‘procedural’ is, however, broadly appropriate as indicating that we are concerned, not with the substantive aims of
legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and
administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be.
The procedural version of natural law relates to
1. Internal morality
2. External morality
3. Objects of legislation
4. Human activities
Correct Answer :-
Internal morality
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
procedural, as distinguished from a substantive natural law. What I have called the internal morality of law is in this sense a
procedural version of natural law, though to avoid misunderstanding the word ‘procedural’ should be assigned a special and
expanded sense so that it would include, for example, a substantive accord between official action and enacted law. The
term ‘procedural’ is, however, broadly appropriate as indicating that we are concerned, not with the substantive aims of
legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and
administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be.
Natural laws, according to this passage, are
1. the ones, having brooding omnipresence in the skies
2. terrestrial in origin and application
3. higher laws
4. lower laws
Choose the correct option from below:
1. 1 and 3 both
2. 1,2 and 3 only
3. 2 and 3 both
4. 2 and 4 both
Correct Answer :-
2 and 4 both
Page 3


1)  
2)  
DU LLB
Topic:- LLB S2 T1
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
procedural, as distinguished from a substantive natural law. What I have called the internal morality of law is in this sense a
procedural version of natural law, though to avoid misunderstanding the word ‘procedural’ should be assigned a special and
expanded sense so that it would include, for example, a substantive accord between official action and enacted law. The
term ‘procedural’ is, however, broadly appropriate as indicating that we are concerned, not with the substantive aims of
legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and
administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be.
The passage is an explanation of….
1. Legal Morality
2. The Worship of God
3. Natural Law
4. God’s Law
Choose the correct option from below.
1. 1,2,3 & 4
2. 1 and 3 only
3. 2 and 3 only
4. 3 only
Correct Answer :-
1 and 3 only
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
3)  
procedural, as distinguished from a substantive natural law. What I have called the internal morality of law is in this sense a
procedural version of natural law, though to avoid misunderstanding the word ‘procedural’ should be assigned a special and
expanded sense so that it would include, for example, a substantive accord between official action and enacted law. The
term ‘procedural’ is, however, broadly appropriate as indicating that we are concerned, not with the substantive aims of
legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and
administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be.
The procedural version of natural law relates to
1. Internal morality
2. External morality
3. Objects of legislation
4. Human activities
Correct Answer :-
Internal morality
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
procedural, as distinguished from a substantive natural law. What I have called the internal morality of law is in this sense a
procedural version of natural law, though to avoid misunderstanding the word ‘procedural’ should be assigned a special and
expanded sense so that it would include, for example, a substantive accord between official action and enacted law. The
term ‘procedural’ is, however, broadly appropriate as indicating that we are concerned, not with the substantive aims of
legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and
administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be.
Natural laws, according to this passage, are
1. the ones, having brooding omnipresence in the skies
2. terrestrial in origin and application
3. higher laws
4. lower laws
Choose the correct option from below:
1. 1 and 3 both
2. 1,2 and 3 only
3. 2 and 3 both
4. 2 and 4 both
Correct Answer :-
2 and 4 both
4)  
5)  
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
procedural, as distinguished from a substantive natural law. What I have called the internal morality of law is in this sense a
procedural version of natural law, though to avoid misunderstanding the word ‘procedural’ should be assigned a special and
expanded sense so that it would include, for example, a substantive accord between official action and enacted law. The
term ‘procedural’ is, however, broadly appropriate as indicating that we are concerned, not with the substantive aims of
legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and
administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be.
The term ‘procedural’ means and includes
1. A  substantive accord between official action and enacted law
2. Administration of a system of rules for governing human conduct
3. Construction of a system of rules for governing human conduct
4. External morality
Choose the correct option from below
1. 1,2,3 & 4
2. 1,2 and 3 only
3. 2 and 3 only
4. 4 only
Correct Answer :-
1,2 and 3 only
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
procedural, as distinguished from a substantive natural law. What I have called the internal morality of law is in this sense a
procedural version of natural law, though to avoid misunderstanding the word ‘procedural’ should be assigned a special and
expanded sense so that it would include, for example, a substantive accord between official action and enacted law. The
term ‘procedural’ is, however, broadly appropriate as indicating that we are concerned, not with the substantive aims of
legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and
administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be.
Page 4


1)  
2)  
DU LLB
Topic:- LLB S2 T1
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
procedural, as distinguished from a substantive natural law. What I have called the internal morality of law is in this sense a
procedural version of natural law, though to avoid misunderstanding the word ‘procedural’ should be assigned a special and
expanded sense so that it would include, for example, a substantive accord between official action and enacted law. The
term ‘procedural’ is, however, broadly appropriate as indicating that we are concerned, not with the substantive aims of
legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and
administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be.
The passage is an explanation of….
1. Legal Morality
2. The Worship of God
3. Natural Law
4. God’s Law
Choose the correct option from below.
1. 1,2,3 & 4
2. 1 and 3 only
3. 2 and 3 only
4. 3 only
Correct Answer :-
1 and 3 only
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
3)  
procedural, as distinguished from a substantive natural law. What I have called the internal morality of law is in this sense a
procedural version of natural law, though to avoid misunderstanding the word ‘procedural’ should be assigned a special and
expanded sense so that it would include, for example, a substantive accord between official action and enacted law. The
term ‘procedural’ is, however, broadly appropriate as indicating that we are concerned, not with the substantive aims of
legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and
administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be.
The procedural version of natural law relates to
1. Internal morality
2. External morality
3. Objects of legislation
4. Human activities
Correct Answer :-
Internal morality
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
procedural, as distinguished from a substantive natural law. What I have called the internal morality of law is in this sense a
procedural version of natural law, though to avoid misunderstanding the word ‘procedural’ should be assigned a special and
expanded sense so that it would include, for example, a substantive accord between official action and enacted law. The
term ‘procedural’ is, however, broadly appropriate as indicating that we are concerned, not with the substantive aims of
legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and
administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be.
Natural laws, according to this passage, are
1. the ones, having brooding omnipresence in the skies
2. terrestrial in origin and application
3. higher laws
4. lower laws
Choose the correct option from below:
1. 1 and 3 both
2. 1,2 and 3 only
3. 2 and 3 both
4. 2 and 4 both
Correct Answer :-
2 and 4 both
4)  
5)  
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
procedural, as distinguished from a substantive natural law. What I have called the internal morality of law is in this sense a
procedural version of natural law, though to avoid misunderstanding the word ‘procedural’ should be assigned a special and
expanded sense so that it would include, for example, a substantive accord between official action and enacted law. The
term ‘procedural’ is, however, broadly appropriate as indicating that we are concerned, not with the substantive aims of
legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and
administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be.
The term ‘procedural’ means and includes
1. A  substantive accord between official action and enacted law
2. Administration of a system of rules for governing human conduct
3. Construction of a system of rules for governing human conduct
4. External morality
Choose the correct option from below
1. 1,2,3 & 4
2. 1,2 and 3 only
3. 2 and 3 only
4. 4 only
Correct Answer :-
1,2 and 3 only
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
procedural, as distinguished from a substantive natural law. What I have called the internal morality of law is in this sense a
procedural version of natural law, though to avoid misunderstanding the word ‘procedural’ should be assigned a special and
expanded sense so that it would include, for example, a substantive accord between official action and enacted law. The
term ‘procedural’ is, however, broadly appropriate as indicating that we are concerned, not with the substantive aims of
legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and
administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be.
1)  
2)  
3)  
4)  
5)  
The enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules relates to
1. Natural laws
2. God's Laws
3. Objects of legislation
4. Higher laws
Choose the correct option from below.
1. 1,2,3 & 4
2. 1 only
3. 2 and 3 both
4. 4 only
Correct Answer :-
1 only
Topic:- LLB S2 T2
According to the World Bank’s ‘Ease of Doing Business rankings’, benchmarked to May 2019, India is ranked at
1. 89 
2. 75 
3. 63 
4. 91 
Correct Answer :-
63 
The difference between total revenue and total expenditure of a government is termed as
1. Fiscal deficit 
2. Revenue deficit 
3. Primary deficit 
4. Monetised deficit 
Correct Answer :-
Fiscal deficit 
In 2019, the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in memory of Alfred Nobel was awarded to
1. Richard H. Thaler
2. William D. Nordhaus 
3. Paul M. Romer
4. Michael Kremer 
Correct Answer :-
Michael Kremer
As per law, the monetary policy framework in India shall be operated by
1. NITI Aayog 
2. Reserve Bank of India 
3. Department of Economic Affairs 
4. Department of Revenue 
Correct Answer :-
Reserve Bank of India 
The head office of the Securities and Exchange Board of India is located at
1. Delhi 
2. Kolkata 
3. Mumbai 
Page 5


1)  
2)  
DU LLB
Topic:- LLB S2 T1
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
procedural, as distinguished from a substantive natural law. What I have called the internal morality of law is in this sense a
procedural version of natural law, though to avoid misunderstanding the word ‘procedural’ should be assigned a special and
expanded sense so that it would include, for example, a substantive accord between official action and enacted law. The
term ‘procedural’ is, however, broadly appropriate as indicating that we are concerned, not with the substantive aims of
legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and
administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be.
The passage is an explanation of….
1. Legal Morality
2. The Worship of God
3. Natural Law
4. God’s Law
Choose the correct option from below.
1. 1,2,3 & 4
2. 1 and 3 only
3. 2 and 3 only
4. 3 only
Correct Answer :-
1 and 3 only
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
3)  
procedural, as distinguished from a substantive natural law. What I have called the internal morality of law is in this sense a
procedural version of natural law, though to avoid misunderstanding the word ‘procedural’ should be assigned a special and
expanded sense so that it would include, for example, a substantive accord between official action and enacted law. The
term ‘procedural’ is, however, broadly appropriate as indicating that we are concerned, not with the substantive aims of
legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and
administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be.
The procedural version of natural law relates to
1. Internal morality
2. External morality
3. Objects of legislation
4. Human activities
Correct Answer :-
Internal morality
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
procedural, as distinguished from a substantive natural law. What I have called the internal morality of law is in this sense a
procedural version of natural law, though to avoid misunderstanding the word ‘procedural’ should be assigned a special and
expanded sense so that it would include, for example, a substantive accord between official action and enacted law. The
term ‘procedural’ is, however, broadly appropriate as indicating that we are concerned, not with the substantive aims of
legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and
administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be.
Natural laws, according to this passage, are
1. the ones, having brooding omnipresence in the skies
2. terrestrial in origin and application
3. higher laws
4. lower laws
Choose the correct option from below:
1. 1 and 3 both
2. 1,2 and 3 only
3. 2 and 3 both
4. 2 and 4 both
Correct Answer :-
2 and 4 both
4)  
5)  
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
procedural, as distinguished from a substantive natural law. What I have called the internal morality of law is in this sense a
procedural version of natural law, though to avoid misunderstanding the word ‘procedural’ should be assigned a special and
expanded sense so that it would include, for example, a substantive accord between official action and enacted law. The
term ‘procedural’ is, however, broadly appropriate as indicating that we are concerned, not with the substantive aims of
legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and
administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be.
The term ‘procedural’ means and includes
1. A  substantive accord between official action and enacted law
2. Administration of a system of rules for governing human conduct
3. Construction of a system of rules for governing human conduct
4. External morality
Choose the correct option from below
1. 1,2,3 & 4
2. 1,2 and 3 only
3. 2 and 3 only
4. 4 only
Correct Answer :-
1,2 and 3 only
Read the passage and answer the following question:
What I have tried to do is to discern and articulate the natural laws of a particular kind of human undertaking, which I have
described as “the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. These natural laws have nothing to
do with any “brooding omnipresence in the skies.” Nor have they the slightest affinity with any such proposition as that the
practice of contraception is a violation of God’s law. They remain entirely terrestrial in origin and application.
They are not “higher” laws; if any metaphor of elevation is appropriate they should be called “lower” laws. They are like
the natural laws of carpentry, or at least those laws respected by a carpenter who wants the house he builds to remain
standing and serve the purpose of those who live in it.
Though these natural laws touch one of the most vital of human activities they obviously do not exhaust the whole of man’s
moral life. They have nothing to say on topics as polygamy, the study of Marx, the worship of God, the progressive income
tax, or the subjugation of women. If the question be raised whether any of these subjects, or others like them, should be
taken as objects of legislation, that question relates to what I have called the external morality of law.
As a convenient (though not wholly satisfactory) way of describing the distinction being taken we may speak of a
procedural, as distinguished from a substantive natural law. What I have called the internal morality of law is in this sense a
procedural version of natural law, though to avoid misunderstanding the word ‘procedural’ should be assigned a special and
expanded sense so that it would include, for example, a substantive accord between official action and enacted law. The
term ‘procedural’ is, however, broadly appropriate as indicating that we are concerned, not with the substantive aims of
legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and
administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be.
1)  
2)  
3)  
4)  
5)  
The enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules relates to
1. Natural laws
2. God's Laws
3. Objects of legislation
4. Higher laws
Choose the correct option from below.
1. 1,2,3 & 4
2. 1 only
3. 2 and 3 both
4. 4 only
Correct Answer :-
1 only
Topic:- LLB S2 T2
According to the World Bank’s ‘Ease of Doing Business rankings’, benchmarked to May 2019, India is ranked at
1. 89 
2. 75 
3. 63 
4. 91 
Correct Answer :-
63 
The difference between total revenue and total expenditure of a government is termed as
1. Fiscal deficit 
2. Revenue deficit 
3. Primary deficit 
4. Monetised deficit 
Correct Answer :-
Fiscal deficit 
In 2019, the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in memory of Alfred Nobel was awarded to
1. Richard H. Thaler
2. William D. Nordhaus 
3. Paul M. Romer
4. Michael Kremer 
Correct Answer :-
Michael Kremer
As per law, the monetary policy framework in India shall be operated by
1. NITI Aayog 
2. Reserve Bank of India 
3. Department of Economic Affairs 
4. Department of Revenue 
Correct Answer :-
Reserve Bank of India 
The head office of the Securities and Exchange Board of India is located at
1. Delhi 
2. Kolkata 
3. Mumbai 
6)  
7)  
8)  
9)  
10)  
11)  
12)  
4. Chennai 
Correct Answer :-
Mumbai
Who among the following was not a recipient of a Nobel Prize?
1. Madam Marie Curie 
2. Abhijeet Banerjee
3. Mahatma Gandhi 
4. Mother Teresa 
Correct Answer :-
Mahatma Gandhi 
Which of the following represents the correct order of organising Tennis Grand Slams in an year (from January to
December)?
1. Australian Open, French Open, Wimbledon, US Open 
2. US Open, Wimbledon, Australian Open, French Open 
3. Australian Open, Wimbledon, French Open, US Open 
4. Wimbledon, French Open, US Open, Australian Open 
Correct Answer :-
Australian Open, French Open, Wimbledon, US Open 
Who among the following was not in the list of Bharat Ratna awardees in 2019?
1. Pranab Mukherjee 
2. Bhupen Hazarika 
3. Nanaji Deshmukh 
4. Deen Dayal Upadhyay   
Correct Answer :-
Deen Dayal Upadhyay   
Who won the Dadasaheb Phalke Award, 2019?
1. Rajnikant
2. Amitabh Bachhan 
3. Bhupen Hazarika 
4. None of these 
Correct Answer :-
n a h h c a B h b a t i m A
Who among the following are the recipients of the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna Award, 2019?
1. Virat Kohli and Cheteswar Pujara 
2. Deepa Malik and Bajrang Punia 
3. Fouaad Mirza and Gaurav Singh Gill 
4. Pooja Dhanda and Gurmeet Singh Sandhu 
Correct Answer :-
Deepa Malik and Bajrang Punia 
Who among the following was the recipient of Raman Magsaysay Award, 2019?
1. Ravish Kumar 
2. Arnab Goswami
3. Sandip Pandey 
4. Punya Prasun Bajpai 
Correct Answer :-
Ravish Kumar 
Which country won the FIFA World Cup Final 2018?
1. Croatia 
2. France 
3. Brazil 
4. Germany
Correct Answer :-
France