What is the legal definition of consideration according to Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act? |
Card: 1 / 40 |
Consideration involves an act, abstinence, or promise made at the desire of the promisor by the promisee or another person. |
Card: 2 / 40 |
Which of the following is NOT a type of consideration? A) Executory B) Past C) Future D) Implied |
Card: 3 / 40 |
True or False: Consideration must always be of equal value to the promise it supports. |
Card: 5 / 40 |
False. Consideration does not need to be adequate or equal in value to the promise. |
Card: 6 / 40 |
In the context of contracts, what is the doctrine that states a stranger to a contract cannot sue? |
Card: 9 / 40 |
Past consideration is valid only if: |
Card: 11 / 40 |
Fill in the blank: An agreement made without consideration is generally ______. |
Card: 13 / 40 |
True or False: A promise to pay a time-barred debt is valid even without consideration. |
Card: 15 / 40 |
What kind of consideration involves a party doing something that they are already legally obligated to do? |
Card: 17 / 40 |
Which exception to the consideration rule allows for a valid contract without consideration in the context of agency? |
Card: 19 / 40 |
![]() Unlock all Flashcards with EduRev Infinity Plan Starting from @ ₹99 only
|
True or False: A promise made as a result of coercion is still valid consideration. |
Card: 23 / 40 |
What must be present for a promise made out of natural love and affection to be enforceable? |
Card: 25 / 40 |
Fill in the blank: The consideration must be lawful and not opposed to ______. |
Card: 27 / 40 |
Term for a promise enforceable by a third party: |
Card: 29 / 40 |
Which statement about consideration is true? |
Card: 31 / 40 |
True or False: A stranger to consideration can enforce a contract under Indian law. |
Card: 35 / 40 |
True. Under Indian law, consideration may move from the promisee or any other person, but only a party to the contract can sue. |
Card: 36 / 40 |
Not valid consideration under Indian law: |
Card: 37 / 40 |
Under what exception can a third party sue despite not being part of the contract? |
Card: 39 / 40 |
In the case of a trust, where the beneficiary can enforce rights even if not a party to the original contract. |
Card: 40 / 40 |