Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Notes  >  Civil Law for Judiciary Exams  >  Introduction to ‘Vis Major’ (Act of God) as a Defence to Torts

Introduction to ‘Vis Major’ (Act of God) as a Defence to Torts | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams PDF Download

Tort Law Overview

  • A tort can be described as an action or a failure to act that results in harm or injury to the affected party. The term "tort" originates from the Latin word "tortum," meaning wrong or crooked.
  • Torts specifically exclude breaches of contracts, with remedies typically involving damages or injunctions.
  • Torts are generally categorized into three main types: negligence, intentional torts, and strict liability.

Negligence in Torts

  • Negligence in torts involves several key elements. Firstly, there must be a duty of care, guided by the standard of a reasonable person.
  • A breach of this duty of care must occur, followed by an assessment of causation, which includes proximate and actual cause.
  • The harm resulting from the negligent act or omission needs to be established.

Intentional Torts

  • Intentional torts require the wrongdoer to purposefully cause harm to the injured party. Some intentional torts can overlap with criminal acts, such as assault or defamation.

Strict Liability

  • Strict liability is a unique form of tort law that holds individuals liable for harm in cases involving abnormally dangerous activities, irrespective of negligence or intent. This principle aims to address harm as a matter of public policy.
  • According to Winifield and Jolowicz, a legal action alleging a tort must prove all necessary elements. Failure to do so will result in the case being dismissed.
  • Even if the elements are proven, the defendant can invoke specific defenses to avoid liability. Defenses with broader scopes are termed general defenses.

Question for Introduction to ‘Vis Major’ (Act of God) as a Defence to Torts
Try yourself:
What is the main difference between negligence and intentional torts?
View Solution

Understanding Vis Major and Act of God

  • Vis Major, also known as Act of God, refers to a superior or inevitable force of nature that cannot be avoided.
  • It absolves a party of liability in situations where harm is caused by an inevitable accident that could not have been prevented.

Application of Act of God Defense

  • Act of God defense is relevant when harm occurs without human intervention and cannot be predicted or prevented by any means.
  • It is typically invoked in cases of significant damage, such as breaches of contracts, to avoid liability for promised actions.

Legal Precedent: Rylands v Fletcher

  • In the case of Rylands v Fletcher, Blackburn J. recognized the concept of Act of God.
  • The plaintiff's mines were flooded due to a reservoir bursting, leading to a legal dispute.
  • Blackburn J. ruled that the defendant could claim non-liability if the harm was caused by the plaintiff's default or an Act of God.
  • Rylands v Fletcher Principle: This legal principle, as seen in the case of Nichols v Marsland, establishes that individuals may not be held liable for damages resulting from natural occurrences they could not have foreseen or prevented.
  • Application of Act of God: Courts determine what incidents qualify as Acts of God. Recent limitations on this defense stem from technological advancements that enhance predictability in certain circumstances.
  • Interpretation in Indian Courts: While Indian courts have not explicitly recognized pandemics as Acts of God, referencing cases like The Divisional Controller, KSRTC v. Mahadava Shetty suggests that natural events uncontaminated by human influence may qualify.
  • Lakeman v Pollard Case: In this scenario, the outbreak of cholera was considered an Act of God, absolving a worker from contractual liability when leaving work due to the outbreak.

Conclusion

  • Vis Major or an Act of God refers to events caused by superior forces that are inevitable, unpredictable, and unforeseeable. The defense of vis major is limited to prevent individuals from unfairly escaping liability.
  • Contractual parties may try to benefit from acts of gods, but the scope of this defense is narrow. To claim the defense of vis major, it is crucial that the event could not have been reasonably predicted. The key factor is whether reasonable human foresight and prudence could anticipate such an occurrence.
  • Examples of vis major events include earthquakes, floods, and other natural disasters. Such events are beyond human control and occur without any human intervention.

Question for Introduction to ‘Vis Major’ (Act of God) as a Defence to Torts
Try yourself:
What is the purpose of the Act of God defense?
View Solution

The document Introduction to ‘Vis Major’ (Act of God) as a Defence to Torts | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams is a part of the Judiciary Exams Course Civil Law for Judiciary Exams.
All you need of Judiciary Exams at this link: Judiciary Exams
253 docs|259 tests

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

FAQs on Introduction to ‘Vis Major’ (Act of God) as a Defence to Torts - Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

1. What is the legal concept of ‘Vis Major’ (Act of God)?
Ans. ‘Vis Major’ or Act of God is a legal defense in tort law that excuses a party from liability for an event that is beyond their control and could not have been reasonably foreseen or prevented.
2. How does ‘Vis Major’ (Act of God) apply as a defense to torts?
Ans. When an event is considered an Act of God, the party responsible for the tort may be excused from liability as they could not have reasonably foreseen or prevented the event from occurring.
3. What are some examples of events that could be considered as Acts of God in tort law?
Ans. Natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, and tornadoes are commonly considered Acts of God in tort law.
4. How does the legal concept of ‘Vis Major’ (Act of God) differ from negligence in tort law?
Ans. Negligence in tort law involves the failure to exercise reasonable care, whereas Acts of God refer to events that are beyond anyone's control and could not have been reasonably foreseen.
5. Can ‘Vis Major’ (Act of God) be used as a defense in all tort cases?
Ans. ‘Vis Major’ can be used as a defense in tort cases where the event in question meets the criteria of being beyond anyone's control and could not have been reasonably foreseen or prevented.
253 docs|259 tests
Download as PDF
Explore Courses for Judiciary Exams exam

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

past year papers

,

Summary

,

Extra Questions

,

study material

,

Free

,

Exam

,

mock tests for examination

,

video lectures

,

Sample Paper

,

pdf

,

practice quizzes

,

Objective type Questions

,

Viva Questions

,

ppt

,

Semester Notes

,

MCQs

,

Important questions

,

Introduction to ‘Vis Major’ (Act of God) as a Defence to Torts | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

Introduction to ‘Vis Major’ (Act of God) as a Defence to Torts | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

,

Introduction to ‘Vis Major’ (Act of God) as a Defence to Torts | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

;