CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Videos  >  Logical Reasoning for CLAT  >  Syllogism - 2

Syllogism - 2 Video Lecture | Logical Reasoning for CLAT

30 videos|83 docs|68 tests

Top Courses for CLAT

FAQs on Syllogism - 2 Video Lecture - Logical Reasoning for CLAT

1. What is a syllogism and how is it used in the CLAT exam?
Ans. A syllogism is a logical reasoning tool used in the CLAT exam to assess a candidate's ability to draw conclusions based on given premises. It consists of two premises and a conclusion, where the conclusion is derived by applying deductive reasoning. This skill is crucial for solving questions in the logical reasoning section of the CLAT exam.
2. Are syllogism questions common in the CLAT exam?
Ans. Yes, syllogism questions are commonly asked in the CLAT exam. Logical reasoning is an important section in CLAT, and syllogism is a frequently tested topic within it. Candidates should be well-versed in syllogism concepts, rules, and techniques to perform well in this section.
3. What are the key components of a syllogism?
Ans. A syllogism consists of three key components: the major premise, the minor premise, and the conclusion. The major premise is a general statement, the minor premise is a specific statement, and the conclusion is the logical deduction drawn from these two premises. Understanding the relationship between the premises is crucial for solving syllogism questions.
4. How can I improve my syllogism skills for the CLAT exam?
Ans. To improve your syllogism skills for the CLAT exam, practice is key. Solve a variety of syllogism questions from previous year papers and mock tests. Familiarize yourself with the different types of syllogism like categorical, hypothetical, and disjunctive syllogism. Learn the rules and techniques involved in solving syllogism questions, such as the conversion, obversion, and contraposition of statements.
5. Can you provide an example of a syllogism question for the CLAT exam?
Ans. Sure! Here's an example: Premise 1: All dogs are mammals. Premise 2: Some mammals are carnivores. Conclusion: A. All carnivores are dogs. B. Some carnivores are dogs. C. All dogs are carnivores. D. Some dogs are carnivores. The correct answer would be B. Some carnivores are dogs, as it is the only conclusion that can be logically derived from the given premises.
30 videos|83 docs|68 tests
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

Exam

,

Viva Questions

,

practice quizzes

,

Sample Paper

,

video lectures

,

Free

,

Objective type Questions

,

Syllogism - 2 Video Lecture | Logical Reasoning for CLAT

,

ppt

,

pdf

,

Extra Questions

,

Syllogism - 2 Video Lecture | Logical Reasoning for CLAT

,

Syllogism - 2 Video Lecture | Logical Reasoning for CLAT

,

study material

,

Important questions

,

MCQs

,

Summary

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

past year papers

,

Semester Notes

,

mock tests for examination

;