Civil Engineering (CE) Exam  >  Civil Engineering (CE) Notes  >  Structural Analysis  >  The Slope Deflection Method: Frames Without Sidesway - 3

The Slope Deflection Method: Frames Without Sidesway - 3 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE) PDF Download

Download, print and study this document offline
Please wait while the PDF view is loading
 Page 1


 
 
?
= 0
B
M       ?        0 = +
BA BC
M M   (4)  
 
Substituting the value of  and  in the above equation, 
BC
M
BA
M
 
    5 . 12 667 . 0 333 . 2 = +
A B
EI EI ? ?    (5) 
 
Or,     
EI
A B
741 . 18
498 . 3 = + ? ? 
 
Solving equation (3) and (4) 
 
) (
245 . 16
) (
002 . 10
clockwise
EI
ckwise counterclo
EI
B
B
-
=
=
?
?
    (6)  
 
Substituting the value of 
A
? and  
B
?  in equation (2) beam end moments are 
evaluated. 
 
0
002 . 10
667 . 0
245 . 16
333 . 1 15 = ?
?
?
?
?
?
+ ?
?
?
?
?
? -
+ =
EI
EI
EI
EI M
AB
 
 
1
002 . 10
33 . 1 .
245 . 16
667 . 0 15 - =
?
?
?
?
?
?
+
?
?
?
?
?
? -
+ - =
EI
EI
EI
EI M
BA
 
 
kN.m 5 . 12
002 . 10
5 . 2 =
?
?
?
?
?
?
+ =
EI
EI M
BC
 
 
kN.m 5 . 2
002 . 10
5 . 0 5 . 2 =
?
?
?
?
?
?
+ - =
EI
EI M
CB
    (7) 
 
Page 2


 
 
?
= 0
B
M       ?        0 = +
BA BC
M M   (4)  
 
Substituting the value of  and  in the above equation, 
BC
M
BA
M
 
    5 . 12 667 . 0 333 . 2 = +
A B
EI EI ? ?    (5) 
 
Or,     
EI
A B
741 . 18
498 . 3 = + ? ? 
 
Solving equation (3) and (4) 
 
) (
245 . 16
) (
002 . 10
clockwise
EI
ckwise counterclo
EI
B
B
-
=
=
?
?
    (6)  
 
Substituting the value of 
A
? and  
B
?  in equation (2) beam end moments are 
evaluated. 
 
0
002 . 10
667 . 0
245 . 16
333 . 1 15 = ?
?
?
?
?
?
+ ?
?
?
?
?
? -
+ =
EI
EI
EI
EI M
AB
 
 
1
002 . 10
33 . 1 .
245 . 16
667 . 0 15 - =
?
?
?
?
?
?
+
?
?
?
?
?
? -
+ - =
EI
EI
EI
EI M
BA
 
 
kN.m 5 . 12
002 . 10
5 . 2 =
?
?
?
?
?
?
+ =
EI
EI M
BC
 
 
kN.m 5 . 2
002 . 10
5 . 0 5 . 2 =
?
?
?
?
?
?
+ - =
EI
EI M
CB
    (7) 
 
Using these results, reactions are evaluated from equilibrium equations as shown 
in Fig 16.4 (e) 
 
 
 
The shear force and bending moment diagrams are shown in Fig 16.4(g) and 
16.4 h respectively. The qualitative elastic curve is shown in Fig 16.4 (h). 
 
Page 3


 
 
?
= 0
B
M       ?        0 = +
BA BC
M M   (4)  
 
Substituting the value of  and  in the above equation, 
BC
M
BA
M
 
    5 . 12 667 . 0 333 . 2 = +
A B
EI EI ? ?    (5) 
 
Or,     
EI
A B
741 . 18
498 . 3 = + ? ? 
 
Solving equation (3) and (4) 
 
) (
245 . 16
) (
002 . 10
clockwise
EI
ckwise counterclo
EI
B
B
-
=
=
?
?
    (6)  
 
Substituting the value of 
A
? and  
B
?  in equation (2) beam end moments are 
evaluated. 
 
0
002 . 10
667 . 0
245 . 16
333 . 1 15 = ?
?
?
?
?
?
+ ?
?
?
?
?
? -
+ =
EI
EI
EI
EI M
AB
 
 
1
002 . 10
33 . 1 .
245 . 16
667 . 0 15 - =
?
?
?
?
?
?
+
?
?
?
?
?
? -
+ - =
EI
EI
EI
EI M
BA
 
 
kN.m 5 . 12
002 . 10
5 . 2 =
?
?
?
?
?
?
+ =
EI
EI M
BC
 
 
kN.m 5 . 2
002 . 10
5 . 0 5 . 2 =
?
?
?
?
?
?
+ - =
EI
EI M
CB
    (7) 
 
Using these results, reactions are evaluated from equilibrium equations as shown 
in Fig 16.4 (e) 
 
 
 
The shear force and bending moment diagrams are shown in Fig 16.4(g) and 
16.4 h respectively. The qualitative elastic curve is shown in Fig 16.4 (h). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Page 4


 
 
?
= 0
B
M       ?        0 = +
BA BC
M M   (4)  
 
Substituting the value of  and  in the above equation, 
BC
M
BA
M
 
    5 . 12 667 . 0 333 . 2 = +
A B
EI EI ? ?    (5) 
 
Or,     
EI
A B
741 . 18
498 . 3 = + ? ? 
 
Solving equation (3) and (4) 
 
) (
245 . 16
) (
002 . 10
clockwise
EI
ckwise counterclo
EI
B
B
-
=
=
?
?
    (6)  
 
Substituting the value of 
A
? and  
B
?  in equation (2) beam end moments are 
evaluated. 
 
0
002 . 10
667 . 0
245 . 16
333 . 1 15 = ?
?
?
?
?
?
+ ?
?
?
?
?
? -
+ =
EI
EI
EI
EI M
AB
 
 
1
002 . 10
33 . 1 .
245 . 16
667 . 0 15 - =
?
?
?
?
?
?
+
?
?
?
?
?
? -
+ - =
EI
EI
EI
EI M
BA
 
 
kN.m 5 . 12
002 . 10
5 . 2 =
?
?
?
?
?
?
+ =
EI
EI M
BC
 
 
kN.m 5 . 2
002 . 10
5 . 0 5 . 2 =
?
?
?
?
?
?
+ - =
EI
EI M
CB
    (7) 
 
Using these results, reactions are evaluated from equilibrium equations as shown 
in Fig 16.4 (e) 
 
 
 
The shear force and bending moment diagrams are shown in Fig 16.4(g) and 
16.4 h respectively. The qualitative elastic curve is shown in Fig 16.4 (h). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Example 16.3 
Compute reactions and beam end moments for the rigid frame shown in Fig 
16.5(a). Draw bending moment diagram and sketch the elastic curve for the 
frame. 
 
Solution 
 
 
 
Page 5


 
 
?
= 0
B
M       ?        0 = +
BA BC
M M   (4)  
 
Substituting the value of  and  in the above equation, 
BC
M
BA
M
 
    5 . 12 667 . 0 333 . 2 = +
A B
EI EI ? ?    (5) 
 
Or,     
EI
A B
741 . 18
498 . 3 = + ? ? 
 
Solving equation (3) and (4) 
 
) (
245 . 16
) (
002 . 10
clockwise
EI
ckwise counterclo
EI
B
B
-
=
=
?
?
    (6)  
 
Substituting the value of 
A
? and  
B
?  in equation (2) beam end moments are 
evaluated. 
 
0
002 . 10
667 . 0
245 . 16
333 . 1 15 = ?
?
?
?
?
?
+ ?
?
?
?
?
? -
+ =
EI
EI
EI
EI M
AB
 
 
1
002 . 10
33 . 1 .
245 . 16
667 . 0 15 - =
?
?
?
?
?
?
+
?
?
?
?
?
? -
+ - =
EI
EI
EI
EI M
BA
 
 
kN.m 5 . 12
002 . 10
5 . 2 =
?
?
?
?
?
?
+ =
EI
EI M
BC
 
 
kN.m 5 . 2
002 . 10
5 . 0 5 . 2 =
?
?
?
?
?
?
+ - =
EI
EI M
CB
    (7) 
 
Using these results, reactions are evaluated from equilibrium equations as shown 
in Fig 16.4 (e) 
 
 
 
The shear force and bending moment diagrams are shown in Fig 16.4(g) and 
16.4 h respectively. The qualitative elastic curve is shown in Fig 16.4 (h). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Example 16.3 
Compute reactions and beam end moments for the rigid frame shown in Fig 
16.5(a). Draw bending moment diagram and sketch the elastic curve for the 
frame. 
 
Solution 
 
 
 
The given frame is kinematically indeterminate to third degree so three rotations 
are to be calculated,
C B
? ? ,  and
D
? .  First calculate the fixed end moments (see 
Fig 16.5 b). 
 
 
 
2
54
4 kN.m
20
F
AB
M
×
== 
 
2
54
2.667 kN.m
30
F
BA
M
-×
==- 
 
2
2
10 3 3
7.5 kN.m
6
F
BC
M
××
== 
 
2
2
10 3 3
7.5 kN.m
6
F
CB
M
-× ×
==- 
 
    (1) 0 = = = =
F
EC
F
CE
F
DB
F
BD
M M M M
 
 
The frame is restrained against sidesway. Four spans must be considered for 
rotating slope – deflection equation: AB, BD, BC and CE. The beam end 
 
Read More
34 videos|140 docs|31 tests

Top Courses for Civil Engineering (CE)

FAQs on The Slope Deflection Method: Frames Without Sidesway - 3 - Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

1. What is the slope deflection method?
The slope deflection method is a structural analysis technique used to calculate the moments and rotations at various points in a frame structure. It is based on the assumption that the frame members do not undergo any sidesway, meaning that they remain perfectly straight during loading.
2. How does the slope deflection method work for frames without sidesway?
In frames without sidesway, the slope deflection method involves analyzing each member individually. The method considers the applied loads, member properties, and support conditions to determine the internal moments and rotations at each joint. These values are then used to calculate the member forces and displacements.
3. What are the advantages of using the slope deflection method for frames without sidesway?
The slope deflection method has several advantages for analyzing frames without sidesway. Firstly, it provides accurate results for determining member forces and displacements. Secondly, it accounts for the stiffness of the members and their connections, resulting in more realistic predictions. Finally, it allows for the consideration of different load patterns and support conditions, making it versatile for different frame configurations.
4. Are there any limitations to using the slope deflection method for frames without sidesway?
Yes, there are a few limitations to using the slope deflection method for frames without sidesway. Firstly, it assumes that the members remain perfectly straight, which may not be the case in reality. Secondly, it can become complex and time-consuming for frames with a large number of members and joints. Lastly, the method may not be suitable for analyzing frames with significant sidesway or lateral displacement.
5. How is the slope deflection method different from other structural analysis techniques?
The slope deflection method differs from other structural analysis techniques, such as the moment distribution method or the direct stiffness method, in its approach and assumptions. Unlike the moment distribution method, which redistributes moments at each joint until equilibrium is reached, the slope deflection method calculates member moments and rotations directly. Additionally, the slope deflection method assumes no sidesway, while the direct stiffness method considers lateral deflections in the analysis.
34 videos|140 docs|31 tests
Download as PDF
Explore Courses for Civil Engineering (CE) exam

Top Courses for Civil Engineering (CE)

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

Extra Questions

,

The Slope Deflection Method: Frames Without Sidesway - 3 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

,

Exam

,

Summary

,

Free

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

pdf

,

The Slope Deflection Method: Frames Without Sidesway - 3 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

,

Viva Questions

,

video lectures

,

past year papers

,

ppt

,

mock tests for examination

,

study material

,

practice quizzes

,

Semester Notes

,

Sample Paper

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

Important questions

,

The Slope Deflection Method: Frames Without Sidesway - 3 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

,

MCQs

,

Objective type Questions

;