UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Notes  >  UPSC Mains Essay Preparation  >  Education As a Short of Commodity Today

Education As a Short of Commodity Today | UPSC Mains Essay Preparation PDF Download

Education As a Short of Commodity Today

structure

(1) Opening    —    Change of attitude of the people.

    —    The intrinsic value of education is no longer recognised.


(2) Body    —    Demand for education has been growing but quality has not kept pace with it.

    —    Education in the past.

    —    Parents of today pushing their children into certain grooves of academic activity.

    —    Self-financing colleges.

    —    Private management.

    —    Conducts of examinations by different agencies.

    —    Adoption of unfair means. 

    —    Neglect of languages, the humanities and social sciences.


(3) Closing    —    Study of humanity should be encouraged.

Over the past three decades, there has been a sea change in the attitudes of people connected with education. Teachers, administrators and planners, students and parents are all looking at education as a sort of commodity  that leads on to better earnings and status in society. It is not surprising that it is so. But what is unfortunate is another development leading to an attitudinal change in society. The intrinsic value of education is no longer recognised  although pious platitudes are mouthed quite frequently.

The main reason is that the flux of change has caught up with education much more dramatically than with other areas of activity. While the demand for education has been growing steadily in the  developing countries including India, 

quality has not kept pace with it. Another factor, and an equally disturbing one, is the politicisation of the campuses. Not only colleges and universities, even high schools seem to be getting infected by this virus. It is not uncommon to find on many campuses pedagogues espousing the cause of one political party or the other, no in any academic sense, but with a fervour that would do a party spokesman proud.

About 30 years ago, student unions and debating societies discussed live political issues. The debates were of a high level with the participants thorough in their home work. Communication skills too were good and even those who set their sights on politics as a career went through this exercise with earnestness and sincerity. Similarly, mock parliaments marked the academic calendar in  many colleges; the professors in charge spent a lot of time and energy guiding students and training them in the art of debating.

These debates attracted a large number of students who came to cheer  their compatriots. There was on all sides a desire to learn, be informed and to enlarge the mental horizon. This aspect, which made college life in the fifties and sixties valuable, is sadly missing today on a vast majority of the campuses. Yet another aspect is that the pedagogues were by and large scholars who believed in furthering knowledge. They had an abundant love for their students and could spare time for those who cane to clarify their doubts. Thus, the mutual bond of affection and scholarship helped cement a life-long relationship between the teacher and the taught. This is conspicuous by its absence today.

These losses cannot be counterbalanced by an impressive infrastructure in the form of stately buildings and an array of instruments in laboratories. The human material of the earlier years did in a large measure fulfil the task set out for it, namely becoming teachers in the true sense of the word and this was done in an environment of virtual poverty of hardware. It is here that the mentors of the olden days score over the pedagogues of today. Perhaps, the teachers of those days worked in a spirit of self-effacement. An inexhaustible love for learning characterised their daily schedule and this got transformed into an abiding love for teaching. In a way, this was the next best that one could wish for in the place of the ancient “gurukula” pattern. But the institutionalised classroom instruction has degenerated in the last three decades for several reasons.

The unholy preoccupation with things that are material (which, of course, is the result of the present consumerist trend), the craving to get rich quickly, the closing of the avenues for certain fields of study to the youth who genuinely pine for these and the decadence that has set in society as a result of the erosion of ethical values are to blame. Caste considerations in the selection of candidates to courses and jobs are also contributing factors. Educationists, by and large, feel that this type of affirmative action by the Centre and the State Governments has been carried to the extreme and needs to be modified to meet the aspirations of the rising generation.

It is a pity that parents are now intent on pushing their children into certain grooves of academic activity. This is evident from the obsession of parents with getting for their wards seats in the professional institutions. There are instances of middle class parents becoming almost paranoid about seats in engineering and medical colleges.

The proliferation of these “self-financing” colleges has in a way satisfied this great demand. But the categorisation  of seats under the labels “free” or “meritbased” and “payment” has led to an anomalous situation. The students selected under the “free” seat quota are perforce to pay tuition fees as prescribed for the Government or aided colleges. Often, the hapless scholars have to pay something more on the sly, especially while opting for preferred courses such as computer science and engineering. But those selected under the “payment” category have to shell out three or four times more. Not unexpectedly, this type of differentiation — two sets of students paying vastly different fees for the same course — produces in the minds of the youth a distorted sense of values.

To be fair to the private managements, it must be said that the cost of establishing and running a professional college has gone up steeply in the last few years. Also, the pressure on the managements to improve the facilities has increased, thanks to the statutory bodies such as the All-India Council for Technical Education and the Medical Council of India. The objective, no doubt, is to make the errant managements who are in the habit of commercialising education mend their ways. This has had a salutary effect in almost every State where the self-financing colleges came up.

The conduct of examinations by different agencies including the school boards and universities, is another prickly issue. In the last few decades, the number of candidates appearing for various public examinations right from the School level to the degree and post-graduate levels has grown up by leaps and bounds. Indeed, it is becoming unmanageable (running into lakhs of candidates in certain categories) for any centralised agency such as the school boards.

A strong case can be made out for decentralising the system taking care at the same time that a modicum of uniformity in evaluation and assessment of answer-scripts in maintained. What is to be guarded against is the leakage of question papers that has come to characterise the modern scene. The “necessary evil” of examinations cannot in the present context be replaced by any other system: the only remedy is to make the entire process, right from the setting up of question papers, invigilation, paper despatch and valuation to the announcement of results fool-proof. Whenever a reexamination is ordered, it is the hard-working, studious candidates who undergo greater hardship. The curbing of malpractices is only one aspect, refining the techniques of evaluation and selection of teachers of integrity to be in charge of the process is the crucial part.

Campus-watchers are struck by the distortion that has crept into the academic field in the last three decades, namely the neglect of languages, the humanities and the social sciences. A study of subjects such as history, politics, sociology, economics, psychology, philosophy, languages and literature provides for a deeper understanding of human relationships, behaviour and social currents. A majority of students go in for sciences and commerce. While this trend is in consonance with the science and technology age, the skewed preference for these subjects may not in the long run benefit society.

There must be some way of making the humanities attractive to youth, both from the point of view of employment opportunities and from a higher plane. Also, the teachers who handle the subjects must be men and women of exceptional ability, capable of sparking student interest. Unfortunately, such teachers are dwindling in numbers all over the country. A vigorous effort must be made to attract talented youth to the humanities which are essential for the evolution of human development.

The document Education As a Short of Commodity Today | UPSC Mains Essay Preparation is a part of the UPSC Course UPSC Mains Essay Preparation.
All you need of UPSC at this link: UPSC
4 videos|152 docs

Top Courses for UPSC

FAQs on Education As a Short of Commodity Today - UPSC Mains Essay Preparation

1. What is the meaning of education as a commodity?
Ans. Education as a commodity refers to the perception of education as a product or service that can be bought and sold in the market. It implies treating education as a commodity that can be consumed for personal benefits rather than valuing it as a means of intellectual and personal growth.
2. Why is education considered a commodity today?
Ans. Education is considered a commodity today due to various factors. Firstly, the increasing commercialization of education has led to the proliferation of private institutions that prioritize profit-making over quality education. Secondly, the demand for degrees and certificates for employment purposes has turned education into a commodity that is seen as a means to secure better job prospects. Lastly, the rise of online education platforms and distance learning programs has made education easily accessible, further reinforcing its commodification.
3. What are the implications of education being treated as a commodity?
Ans. Treating education as a commodity has several implications. Firstly, it leads to the commodification of knowledge, where the focus shifts from holistic learning to acquiring degrees and certifications. This results in a superficial understanding of subjects and a lack of critical thinking skills. Secondly, it widens the educational inequalities as those who can afford to pay for quality education have an advantage over those who cannot. Additionally, the commodification of education often leads to the neglect of arts, humanities, and other non-profitable subjects in favor of economically viable disciplines.
4. How does the commodification of education impact society?
Ans. The commodification of education has various impacts on society. Firstly, it reinforces social inequalities as access to quality education becomes limited to those who can afford it, widening the gap between the rich and the poor. Secondly, it promotes a utilitarian approach to education, where the sole purpose is to acquire skills for employment rather than fostering well-rounded individuals. This can lead to a society that values materialistic gains over personal growth and societal well-being. Lastly, the commodification of education can undermine the autonomy of teachers and the integrity of the educational system, as profit-driven institutions prioritize commercial interests over academic excellence.
5. What are the possible solutions to counter the commodification of education?
Ans. To counter the commodification of education, several measures can be taken. Firstly, there is a need for increased investment in public education to ensure equal access and quality education for all. This includes providing scholarships and financial aid to underprivileged students. Secondly, the focus should shift from rote learning and examination-oriented education to a more holistic approach that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and personal growth. Additionally, regulations need to be put in place to curb the commercialization of education and ensure that institutions prioritize educational values over profit-making. Finally, promoting awareness and dialogue about the detrimental effects of treating education as a commodity can help in changing societal perspectives and emphasizing the true value of education.
4 videos|152 docs
Download as PDF
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

Free

,

Important questions

,

study material

,

Semester Notes

,

Exam

,

ppt

,

Education As a Short of Commodity Today | UPSC Mains Essay Preparation

,

practice quizzes

,

Viva Questions

,

pdf

,

mock tests for examination

,

MCQs

,

past year papers

,

video lectures

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

Education As a Short of Commodity Today | UPSC Mains Essay Preparation

,

Summary

,

Sample Paper

,

Objective type Questions

,

Education As a Short of Commodity Today | UPSC Mains Essay Preparation

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

Extra Questions

;