Syllogism-Based Questions

Syllogism

Syllogism is an important topic in verbal reasoning that helps you think logically and draw conclusions from given statements. It appears regularly in competitive exams to test how well you can connect information and decide what must be true.

Most syllogism questions are best solved with Venn diagrams. A clear Venn diagram shows how the groups in the statements are related, making it much easier to check whether the conclusions follow.


Syllogism

Syllogism conclusions are generally of two kinds: definite conclusions (those that must be true given the statements) and possible conclusions (those that may be true without contradicting the statements). Before judging a conclusion, always construct the simplest Venn diagram that represents the statements; this simplifies the subsequent analysis.

Shortcut Tricks 

Some shortcut tricks will help you solve it simply and also take less time to solve questions
The following given cases have the respective Venn diagram which will help in solving questions of such kind 

  1. All DOGS are CATS

    Shortcut Tricks 
  2. Some DOGS are CATSShortcut Tricks 
  3. No DOG is CATS
    Shortcut Tricks 
  4. Some DOGS are not CATS
    Shortcut Tricks 

Solved Examples

  • In each of the questions below, two statements are followed by two conclusions numbered 1 and 2. 
  • You have to consider the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and choose the correct option about conclusions which logically follows from the two given statements.
    (a)only conclusion i follow
    (b)only conclusion ii follow
    (c)either i or ii follows.
    (d)neither i nor ii follows.
    (e)both i or ii follows.

Example 1: Statements:

  • All cows are goat
  • All goat are dog

Conclusions:

  1. All cows are dog
  2. Some cows are dog

Ans: (e)
Solved Examples

Explanation: 

  • Conclusion 1: "All cows are dogs."

    • Since all cows are goats (from Statement 1) and all goats are dogs (from Statement 2), it logically follows that all cows must be dogs. This conclusion is true.
  • Conclusion 2: "Some cows are dogs."

    • If all cows are dogs (as derived from Conclusion 1), then it's also true that some cows are dogs. This conclusion is also true because "some" is a subset of "all."
      Therefore, Conclusion i and ii follows.

Example 2: Statements:

  • All cows are dogs
  • Some dogs are goat
  • No goats are rat

Conclusions:

  1. Some rats are cows
  2. No rats are cows

Ans: (b)
Solved Examples

Conclusion 1: Some rats are cows

There is NO link at all between rats and cows.

From:

All cows → dogs

Some dogs → goats

No goats → rats

You cannot infer existence of rats inside cows.

This conclusion does NOT follow.


Conclusion 2: No rats are cows

Again, no direct relationship between cows and rats is given.

It is possible that:

Some cows are rats

Or no cows are rats

So this is also NOT definite.

Answer: (d) Neither conclusion I nor II follows

Possibility

A possibility question asks whether a particular configuration can be true without contradicting the given statements. To evaluate a possibility, construct a Venn diagram that satisfies the statements and then check if the proposed possibility can coexist with those diagrams.

Note: While checking a possibility-based conclusion, draw a Venn diagram that satisfies both the statements and the possibility, ensuring the original statements are not violated.

Possibility conclusions may be phrased positively (something is possible) or negatively (something is impossible). Testing involves verifying existence of at least one model (Venn configuration) where the possibility holds.

Example: Statements:

  • All books are pen
  • Some pen are pencil
  • No pencil is Eraser

Conclusions:

  1. All books being Eraser is possibility
  2. Some books being Eraser possibility

Ans: (d)

  • All books being erasers is a possibility.

    • Explanation: Since all books are pens, and some pens are pencils, but no pencils are erasers, it is possible for books (which are pens) to be erasers as long as they are not among the pens that are pencils. There is no statement preventing all books from being erasers.
  • Some books being erasers is a possibility.

    • Explanation: Even if not all books are erasers, the fact that some pens are not pencils allows for the possibility that some of these pens (which are books) could be erasers without violating any of the given statements.
The document Syllogism-Based Questions is a part of the Mechanical Engineering Course General Aptitude for GATE.
All you need of Mechanical Engineering at this link: Mechanical Engineering

FAQs on Syllogism-Based Questions

1. How do I identify the middle term in a syllogism question?
Ans. The middle term appears in both premises but never in the conclusion. To spot it, read both statements carefully and find which noun or concept connects them without appearing in the final statement. This identification is crucial for determining whether syllogism conclusions are valid or invalid in SSC CGL Tier 2 exams.
2. What's the difference between universal and particular propositions in syllogism?
Ans. Universal propositions (All/No) apply to entire groups, while particular propositions (Some) apply to only parts of groups. Understanding this distinction helps students evaluate whether syllogism conclusions logically follow from premises, a key skill for solving statement-based reasoning questions accurately.
3. Why do some syllogism answers say "conclusion doesn't follow" even though it sounds logical?
Ans. Conclusions must follow strict logical rules, not common sense. A statement may seem reasonable but violate distribution rules or contradict given premises. In SSC CGL exams, only conclusions provable from the given statements are considered valid, regardless of real-world truth.
4. How do I quickly check if both premises are negative in a syllogism problem?
Ans. If a premise contains "No" or "Not," mark it as negative. Having two negative premises violates fundamental syllogism rules-no valid conclusion exists. This quick check eliminates incorrect options immediately and saves time during competitive exams without needing detailed analysis.
5. Can a particular premise ever lead to a universal conclusion in syllogism?
Ans. No, this violates syllogistic logic. Particular premises (Some) cannot support universal conclusions (All/No). When solving SSC CGL problems, if you spot this combination, the conclusion is automatically invalid, helping you eliminate wrong options efficiently without extensive reasoning.
Explore Courses for Mechanical Engineering exam
Get EduRev Notes directly in your Google search
Related Searches
Viva Questions, Previous Year Questions with Solutions, video lectures, past year papers, study material, practice quizzes, Semester Notes, pdf , MCQs, Exam, Syllogism-Based Questions, Syllogism-Based Questions, shortcuts and tricks, Summary, Objective type Questions, mock tests for examination, Free, Important questions, Syllogism-Based Questions, Extra Questions, ppt, Sample Paper;