UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Notes  >  History for UPSC CSE  >  Old NCERT Summary (Satish Chandra): Climax & Disintegration of Mughal Empire- 1

Old NCERT Summary (Satish Chandra): Climax & Disintegration of Mughal Empire- 1 | History for UPSC CSE PDF Download

PROBLEMS OF SUCESSION
(i) The last years of Shah Jahan's reign were clouded by a bitter war of succession among his four sons
(a) Dara Shikoh (crown prince)
(b) Shuja (governor of Bengal)
(c) Aurangazeb (governor of Deccan)
(d) Murad Baksh (governor of Malwa and Gujarat)
(ii) Aurangazeb emerged victorious in this struggle
(iii) He entered the Agra Fort after defeating Dara
(iv) He forced Shah Jahan to surrender
(v) Shah Jahan was confined to the female apartments in the Agra fort and strictly put under watch
(vi) Shah Jahan lived for eight long years lovingly nursed by his daughter Jahanara.

AURANGZEB'S REIGN
Aurangazeb (1658-1707)
(i) Aurangazeb was one of the ablest kings of the Mughal.
(ii) He assumed the title Alamgir, World Conqueror.
(iii) In his first ten years of reign, his military campaigns were a great success.
(iv) But in the latter part of his reign, he faced serious difficulties.
(v) The Jats and Satnamis and also the Sikhs revolted against him due to his harsh religious policy.
(vi) The Deccan policy of the Mughals started from the reign of Akbar. Aurangazeb, as governor of Deccan, followed a belligerent Deccan policy.
(vii) He concentrated on the northwest frontier in his first 25 years as the Mughal emperor
(viii) In the same time, Shivaji, the Maratha Ruler carved an independent Maratha kingdom in the territories of north and south Konkan.
(ix) Aurangazeb decided to invade Bijapur and Golkonda to hold the spread of the Marathas.
(x) He defeated Sikandar Shah of Bijapur and seized his kingdom.
(xi) He proceeded against Golkonda and eliminated the Kutb Shahi dynasty.
(xii) The destruction of the Deccan kingdoms was a political blunder by Aurangazeb.
(xiii) The barrier between the Mughals and the Marathas was removed and there ensued a direct confrontation between them.

POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS
(i) Recurrent War of succession let the local rajas and zamindars not paying the revenue or capturing and plundering neighbouring areas.
(ii) The relative independence given to the north east and the deccan kingdom owing to the forward policy of Mughals was overturned by Aurangzeb.
(iii) Upon his succession he tried consolidation of the empire by tightening the noose and reasserting Imperial prestige.
(iv) This led to rebellions in various parts of Mughal empire.

POPULAR REVOLTS FOR INDEPENDENCE
There were many revolts against Aurangzeb from significant sections of the population for regional independence. Jats, Satnamis, Sikhs & Rajputs, all challenged Mughal hegemony & gravely damaged its prestige.

JATS AND SATNAMIS
The Jats
(i) Mathura started a peasant rebellion under a local zamindar.
(ii) While dealing with them the Mughal did not completely crush them and they were discontented.
(iii) There was second uprising under the leadership of Rajaram. They were better organised this time and adept with guerrilla warfare sought to plundering.
(iv) His successor Churaman was able to carve out an individual principality owing to growing weakness of the Mughal administration.

The Satnami sect.
(i) was founded in 1657 in Narnaul (Haryana).
(ii) The Satnamis revolted in 1672 when a mughal soldier killed a satnami. They were already fed up with the atrocities of Aurangzeb.
(iii) They killed the soldier in revenge & revolted against the Mughals. They defeated the Mughal armies at many places.
(iv) The Satnamis were badly defeated by Mughal forces under the leadership of Radandai.

AFGHANS
(i) The revivalist religious movement called Raushanai intellectual and moral background for unity.
(ii) The Afghan uprising led by a tribal leader bhagu assumed the title Muhammad Shah.
(iii) It deflected Mughal might from Marathas and Meanwhile Shivaji crowned himself.

SIKHS
(i) In 1675 Aurangzeb had executed Guru Tejh Bahadur, (9th Guru).
(ii) This gave rise to revolt against Mughals in punjab.
(iii) Guru Gobind singh waged a bloody battle against the Mughals & gave a powerful blow to the Mughal empire.

RAJPUTS
(i) In the beginning, Aurangzeb had cordial relations with the Rajputs.
(ii) The Rajput rebellion of 1679-80 shows Aurangzeb's hardened attitude towards his non-Muslim subjects.
(iii) Aurangzeb did not treat well Rana Jaswant singh of jodhpur & Rana Jai singh of Amber who had sincerely given their services to Mughal Empire. Rana Jaswant singh was sent to attack where he died in fort of jamrud, Rana Jai singh was poisoned by Aurangzeb.
(iv) Jodhpur was captured by Mughals.
(v) It was followed by a prolonged struggle between Aurangzeb & Marwar.
(vi) Aurangzeb had to retreat & struggle stopped for a short time but after death of Aurangzeb Jodhpur was re-captured by Rajputs

The document Old NCERT Summary (Satish Chandra): Climax & Disintegration of Mughal Empire- 1 | History for UPSC CSE is a part of the UPSC Course History for UPSC CSE.
All you need of UPSC at this link: UPSC
121 videos|490 docs|176 tests

Top Courses for UPSC

FAQs on Old NCERT Summary (Satish Chandra): Climax & Disintegration of Mughal Empire- 1 - History for UPSC CSE

1. What were the main reasons for the climax and disintegration of the Mughal Empire?
Ans. The main reasons for the climax and disintegration of the Mughal Empire were political instability, weak successors, regional revolts, economic decline, and foreign invasions. The empire faced constant power struggles among the nobles and court factions, leading to a lack of strong leadership. Additionally, the weak successors of Emperor Aurangzeb were unable to maintain the empire's integrity. Revolts by regional governors and zamindars further weakened the empire, while economic decline and heavy taxation disrupted the social and economic order. Foreign invasions, notably by the Marathas and the British, also played a significant role in the downfall of the Mughal Empire.
2. How did political instability contribute to the decline of the Mughal Empire?
Ans. Political instability played a crucial role in the decline of the Mughal Empire. Constant power struggles among the nobles and court factions weakened the central authority and led to a lack of strong leadership. Succession disputes further exacerbated the problem, with weak successors unable to effectively govern and maintain the empire's integrity. The absence of a stable political structure created a favorable environment for regional revolts and foreign invasions, ultimately contributing to the disintegration of the Mughal Empire.
3. What were the economic factors that led to the downfall of the Mughal Empire?
Ans. Several economic factors contributed to the downfall of the Mughal Empire. The empire experienced a decline in agricultural productivity due to factors such as over-taxation and the misuse of revenue by the nobles. This led to economic distress among peasants and zamindars, fueling social unrest and revolts. The empire's revenue system became inefficient, with corruption and the diversion of funds becoming rampant. Additionally, foreign trade suffered due to the emergence of European powers and their control over important trade routes. These economic challenges, combined with the financial strain caused by constant warfare, weakened the empire's economic foundations and accelerated its decline.
4. How did regional revolts contribute to the disintegration of the Mughal Empire?
Ans. Regional revolts played a significant role in the disintegration of the Mughal Empire. As the central authority weakened, regional governors and zamindars started asserting their autonomy and challenging the empire's control. They often refused to pay taxes or provide military support to the Mughal Emperor, further undermining the empire's power and resources. These revolts not only drained the empire's revenue and military strength but also created opportunities for external powers, such as the Marathas and the British, to exploit the situation and expand their own influence. The cumulative effect of these revolts eventually led to the fragmentation and downfall of the Mughal Empire.
5. How did foreign invasions contribute to the decline of the Mughal Empire?
Ans. Foreign invasions significantly contributed to the decline of the Mughal Empire. The emergence of powerful regional kingdoms, such as the Marathas, posed a direct military threat to the empire. The Marathas, in particular, launched several successful campaigns against the Mughals, capturing key provinces and weakening the empire's territorial control. Furthermore, the arrival of European powers, particularly the British, transformed the political dynamics in India. The British gradually established their dominance through military victories, economic exploitation, and strategic alliances with local rulers. These foreign invasions not only eroded the empire's territorial integrity but also undermined its military strength and economic resources, ultimately leading to its disintegration.
121 videos|490 docs|176 tests
Download as PDF
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

mock tests for examination

,

video lectures

,

Old NCERT Summary (Satish Chandra): Climax & Disintegration of Mughal Empire- 1 | History for UPSC CSE

,

Extra Questions

,

past year papers

,

Objective type Questions

,

study material

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

Sample Paper

,

ppt

,

Free

,

Exam

,

MCQs

,

Old NCERT Summary (Satish Chandra): Climax & Disintegration of Mughal Empire- 1 | History for UPSC CSE

,

practice quizzes

,

Viva Questions

,

Important questions

,

Old NCERT Summary (Satish Chandra): Climax & Disintegration of Mughal Empire- 1 | History for UPSC CSE

,

Summary

,

pdf

,

Semester Notes

;