CLAT Exam > CLAT Notes > Current Affairs & General Knowledge > Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del]
Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] | Current Affairs & General Knowledge - CLAT PDF Download
- It was stated that the trial Court had arrived at the finding that appellant No. 1 had Sub-let, assigned or otherwise parted with possession of the premises to appellant No. 2 primarily for the reason that the appellants did not produce the relevant records and documents despite their having been served with a notice dated 7th March 1978 purporting to be under Order XII Rule 8 of the Code read with Section 66 of the Evidence Act (copy marked XI) but such notice was never served on appellant No. 1 and as such the trial Court was in error in assuming that the records and documents mentioned in the notice marked ‘XI’ had been with-held deliberately, and, therefore, the presumption that if produced, the same would not have supported the case of the appellants, would be well warranted.
- As regards the service of notice under Order XII Rule 8 of the Code read with Section 66 of the Evidence Act, there is considerable force in the submission of the learned counsel for the appellants that both the courts below slipped into a grave error in assuming that the said notice was duly served on appellant No. 1. Postal receipt marked ‘X2’ and the acknowledgement receipt marked ‘X3’ would no doubt show that a letter addressed to appellant No. 1 at their correct address of Bombay was sent by registered A.D. post and the same was duly delivered to someone on behalf of the addressee.
- This certainly raises a presumption in favour of official acts having been duly performed not only under Section 114(f) of the Evidence Act but also under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act. Indeed, raising of such a presumption under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act would appear to be mandatory in view of the words “the service shall be deemed to be effected by properly addressing, prepaying and posting by registered post, a letter containing the document, and unless the contrary is proved, to have been effected at the time at which the letter would be delivered in the ordinary course of post” appearing in the said Section. These receipts were put to Shri Ahuja, appellant No. 2 when he was in the witness box and he denied receipt of any such notice.
- However, he could not say whose signatures appear on the acknowledgement receipt “X3”. No doubt, presumption arising under both Section 114, illustration (f) of the Evidence Act and Section 27 of the General Clauses Act is rebuttable one but it is well settled that mere denial of service without anything more is not enough to discharge the onus which lies on the addressee to disprove the receipt of letter and he must prove some circumstances which would show that the notice never reached the addressee.
- Mere denial by the tenant does not rebut the presumption raised under Section 114, illustration (f) of the Indian Evidence Act. The tenant must produce some other evidence to show that the usual course of the post was interrupted by disturbances .So, no exception can be taken to the presumption raised by the learned Rent Controller and for that matter sent the Tribunal with regard to the delivery of a letter sent to appellant No. 1 by registered A.D. post vide X2 & X3.
- However, the critical question which would still arise is whether it could be further inferred from this mere fact that notice, of which copy is marked X1, was sent in the said envelope to appellant No 1. There is not an iota of evidence with regard to the same as the said notice was produced at the stage of cross-examination of Ahuja and it was then placed on record. Neither the respondent nor any other witness testified to the fact that the registered envelope contained the original document, of which marked X 1 is a copy.
- Evidently it was incumbent on the appellants to adduce evidence to the effect that the registered letter contained the notice of which X 1 is the copy. Hence, both the courts below slipped into a grave error in presuming that the notice marked XI was contained in the registered letter which was delivered to appellant No. I vide acknowledgement receipt marked X3. If that be so, no adverse inference can be drawn against the appellants that they withheld the documents which they were called upon to produce vide notice marked Xl probably because the said documents, if produced, would not have supported the case of the appellants.
There is consistent and reliable evidence establishing that all the accused had attacked the house of the informan
The document Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] | Current Affairs & General Knowledge - CLAT is a part of the CLAT Course Current Affairs & General Knowledge.
All you need of CLAT at this link: CLAT
|
125 videos|815 docs|31 tests
|
Related Exams
About this Document
|
4.80/5 Rating |
|
Nov 21, 2024 Last updated |
Document Description: Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] for CLAT 2024 is part of Current Affairs & General Knowledge preparation.
The notes and questions for Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] covers topics
like and Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] Example, for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del].
Introduction of Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] in English is available as part of our Current Affairs & General Knowledge
for CLAT & Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] in Hindi for Current Affairs & General Knowledge course.
Download more important topics related with notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT
Exam by signing up for free. CLAT: Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] | Current Affairs & General Knowledge - CLAT
Description
Full syllabus notes, lecture & questions for Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] | Current Affairs & General Knowledge - CLAT - CLAT | Plus excerises question with solution to help you revise complete syllabus for Current Affairs & General Knowledge | Best notes, free PDF download
Information about Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del]
In this doc you can find the meaning of Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides explaining types of
Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] tests, examples and also practice CLAT
tests
|
125 videos|815 docs|31 tests
|
Download as PDF
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
Related Searches
Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] | Current Affairs & General Knowledge - CLAT
,mock tests for examination
,MCQs
,video lectures
,Extra Questions
,Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] | Current Affairs & General Knowledge - CLAT
,Important questions
,Viva Questions
,ppt
,Previous Year Questions with Solutions
,Sample Paper
,Summary
,Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] | Current Affairs & General Knowledge - CLAT
,Exam
,study material
,practice quizzes
,Semester Notes
,Free
,Objective type Questions
,past year papers
,shortcuts and tricks
;
Additional Information about Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] for CLAT Preparation
Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] Free PDF Download
The Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] is an invaluable resource that delves deep into the core of the CLAT exam.
These study notes are curated by experts and cover all the essential topics and concepts, making your preparation more efficient and effective.
With the help of these notes, you can grasp complex subjects quickly, revise important points easily,
and reinforce your understanding of key concepts. The study notes are presented in a concise and easy-to-understand manner,
allowing you to optimize your learning process. Whether you're looking for best-recommended books, sample papers, study material,
or toppers' notes, this PDF has got you covered. Download the Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] now and kickstart your journey towards success in the CLAT exam.
Importance of Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del]
The importance of Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] cannot be overstated, especially for CLAT aspirants.
This document holds the key to success in the CLAT exam.
It offers a detailed understanding of the concept, providing invaluable insights into the topic.
By knowing the concepts well in advance, students can plan their preparation effectively.
Utilize this indispensable guide for a well-rounded preparation and achieve your desired results.
Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] Notes
Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] Notes offer in-depth insights into the specific topic to help you master it with ease.
This comprehensive document covers all aspects related to Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del].
It includes detailed information about the exam syllabus, recommended books, and study materials for a well-rounded preparation.
Practice papers and question papers enable you to assess your progress effectively.
Additionally, the paper analysis provides valuable tips for tackling the exam strategically.
Access to Toppers' notes gives you an edge in understanding complex concepts.
Whether you're a beginner or aiming for advanced proficiency, Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] Notes on EduRev are your ultimate resource for success.
Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] CLAT Questions
The "Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] CLAT Questions" guide is a valuable resource for all aspiring students preparing for the
CLAT exam. It focuses on providing a wide range of practice questions to help students gauge
their understanding of the exam topics. These questions cover the entire syllabus, ensuring comprehensive preparation.
The guide includes previous years' question papers for students to familiarize themselves with the exam's format and difficulty level.
Additionally, it offers subject-specific question banks, allowing students to focus on weak areas and improve their performance.
Study Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] on the App
Students of CLAT can study Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] alongwith tests & analysis from the EduRev app,
which will help them while preparing for their exam. Apart from the Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del],
students can also utilize the EduRev App for other study materials such as previous year question papers, syllabus, important questions, etc.
The EduRev App will make your learning easier as you can access it from anywhere you want.
The content of Gill & Co. v. Bimla Kumari Jolly [1986 Del] is prepared as per the latest CLAT syllabus.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup