| Table of contents | |
| Steady-State Error and Error Constants | |
| Summary |
When we describe the transient response of a control system to a standard input (commonly a unit step), several time-domain specifications are used to quantify performance. These specifications help compare systems and guide design choices.







Relation with damping ratio: For a standard under-damped second-order system, the peak overshoot is given by
Mp = e-ζπ / √(1 - ζ²)
Where tan φ =


This section derives and summarises the unit impulse response of a standard linear time-invariant second-order system. The unit impulse response is the system output when the input is a unit impulse δ(t). It is the inverse Laplace transform of the system transfer function when the input Laplace transform equals 1.
The commonly used standard form is
G(s) = ωn2 / (s² + 2ζωns + ωn2)
Here ωn is the natural frequency and ζ is the damping ratio. The damped natural frequency is
ωd = ωn √(1 - ζ²)
For a unit impulse input, Y(s) = G(s) · 1 = G(s). Therefore the impulse response y(t) is the inverse Laplace transform of G(s).
Poles are complex conjugates and the inverse Laplace gives a decaying sinusoid.
The impulse response is
y(t) = (ωn / ωd) e-ζωnt sin(ωd t), for t > 0
Poles are repeated at s = -ωn; partial fraction inversion yields
y(t) = ωn2 t e-ωn t, for t > 0
Poles are distinct real negatives, s1 and s2, where
s1 = -ωn(ζ + √(ζ² - 1)), s2 = -ωn(ζ - √(ζ² - 1))
Using partial fractions:
y(t) = (ωn2 / (s1 - s2)) [ es1 t - es2 t ], for t > 0
The unit step response is the time integral of the impulse response.
If c(t) denotes the step response and g(t) the impulse response, then
c(t) = ∫₀ᵗ g(τ) dτ
This relation is often used to derive step-response specifications from the impulse response and vice versa.
If a zero at s = -z is added to a second-order system, the closed-loop/numerator polynomial changes and the transient response is modified. Consider the modified transfer function with a zero at s = -z. The mathematical form and algebraic manipulation are shown in the figures below.




The type of a feedback system is determined by the number of pure integrators (poles at the origin) in the open-loop transfer function. If the open-loop transfer function is written as:

The steady-state performance of a stable feedback control system is judged by its steady-state error in tracking standard inputs: step, ramp and parabolic. For a unity feedback system, the block diagram relation gives an error transfer function which determines e(s) in terms of the input R(s) and the open-loop transfer function G(s)H(s).

For a unity feedback configuration, the error E(s) is

Thus, steady-state error depends on the input R(s) and the forward (open-loop) transfer function G(s). The following error constants are defined for standard inputs:

where


ess = 1 / Kv
where


ess = 1 / Ka
where

The values of Kp, Kv and Ka and the system type determine whether the steady-state error is finite or zero for the respective input types. Increasing system type (adding integrators) improves steady-state accuracy for ramp and parabolic inputs but affects transient behaviour and stability; design requires a trade-off.
The unit impulse response of a second-order system reveals the essential transient behaviour: exponential decay, oscillation frequency and the effect of damping. Time-domain specifications such as rise time, peak time, settling time and overshoot can be expressed in terms of the damping ratio ζ and natural frequency ωn. Adding zeros alters transient response (often producing peaking) and must be used with care. Steady-state tracking error for standard inputs is determined by system type and error constants Kp, Kv, Ka, which guide the selection of controller structure and gains.
53 videos|116 docs|40 tests |
| 1. What is a unit impulse response? | ![]() |
| 2. How is the unit impulse response of a 2nd order system calculated? | ![]() |
| 3. What information can be obtained from the unit impulse response of a 2nd order system? | ![]() |
| 4. How does the damping ratio affect the unit impulse response of a 2nd order system? | ![]() |
| 5. Can the unit impulse response of a 2nd order system be used to determine the system's stability? | ![]() |