Fertile material can transmute into a fissile radioisotope (e.g., U-233) but cannot itself sustain a chain reaction.
Thorium is by itself fertile.
In a thorium reactor, a fissile material like uranium or plutonium is blanketed by thorium.
The fissile material, also called a driver, drives the chain reaction to produce energy while simultaneously transmuting the fertile material into fissile material.
1. Nuclear Fission:
2. Nuclear Fusion:
3. Criticality:
Atoms consist of protons, neutrons, and electrons. The nucleus contains protons and neutrons, with electrons surrounding it. The atomic mass is the sum of protons and neutrons.
Isotopes are atoms with the same number of protons but different numbers of neutrons. Thus, isotopes have the same atomic number but different mass numbers.
For example: U-233, U-235, U-238 (U – Uranium).
Of these, U-233 and U-235 are fissile, while U-238 is fertile.
The first two break down to produce heat, neutrons, and two lighter nuclei, while U-238 transmutes into Pu-239, a fissile substance.
Similarly, Th-232 is fertile and transmutes into U-233.
India embarked on nuclear weapons development after the 1962 war with China, followed by China’s nuclear tests in 1964 and subsequent years.
In 1999, India adopted a nuclear doctrine emphasizing “No First Use” (NFU), minimal deterrence, and non-use against non-nuclear-weapon states, as articulated by former National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon. The NFU, paired with credible minimum deterrence (CMD), remains a cornerstone of India’s nuclear policy.
As of 2025, India’s nuclear power plants contribute approximately 3.5% to the national energy mix, a modest increase from 3% in 2020, driven by new reactor commissions. The Indo-US Nuclear Deal (2008) facilitated international cooperation, enabling the commissioning of Kudankulam Units 1–3 (with Russian assistance) and progress on Units 4–6, expected by 2027.
Nuclear Fuel of the Future: Thorium
According to the Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and Research (AMD), India has 11.93 million tonnes of monazite, containing about 1.07 million tonnes of thorium, representing 25% of global reserves. Thorium can reduce uranium imports, enhancing energy security.
Thorium Cycle – Working
Thorium-232 is a fertile material. The thorium cycle is depicted in the following figure:
Reasons Thorium Has Not Been Fully Developed
Spent Fuel Reprocessing Process
Uranium enrichment increases the percentage of U-235 using centrifuges. Natural uranium comprises 99.3% U-238 (non-fissile) and 0.7% U-235 (fissile). Enrichment enhances U-235 content for reactor fuel.
Enriched uranium is categorized as:
Nuclear Cooperation Agreement
India aims to produce 25% of its electricity from nuclear sources by 2050, with interim targets of 13,800 MW by 2032 and 100,000 MW by 2047, aligning with net-zero goals by 2070. As of 2025, nuclear capacity is 8,900 MW, contributing 3.5% to total electricity. Domestic uranium meets only 20% of demand, necessitating imports.
India has nuclear cooperation agreements with Argentina, Australia, Canada, France, Japan, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Namibia, South Korea, Russia, UK, USA, and Uzbekistan, providing:
India’s obligations include a separation plan and IAEA safeguards. In 2006, of 21 reactors, 14 were classified as civilian (under IAEA inspection) and 8 as military, recognizing India’s nuclear weapons status. India negotiated a unique Additional Protocol, committing to:
India maintains a voluntary moratorium on nuclear testing and is developing a Nuclear Liability Law to define accident liabilities, addressing concerns post-Fukushima (2011).
Under Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, India signed the Indo-US Nuclear Deal, known as the 123 Agreement, under Section 123 of the US Atomic Energy Act 1954. The Hyde Act (2006) amended NPT requirements, enabling the deal’s ratification in 2008.
Highlights of the agreement:
India rejected linking the deal’s termination to nuclear testing. If India tests, negotiations occur within a year, with termination requiring one-year notice. The deal is reviewed annually by the US President.
Implications:
Finalized in November 2016, India is the only non-NPT country with a nuclear cooperation agreement with Japan. The deal is significant because:
Post-Fukushima (2011), talks paused but resumed with India proposing reactor purchases over steel. The agreement includes:
1. Notes on Views and Understanding: India commits to No First Use and voluntary nuclear testing restrictions.
2. Main Agreement: India views only this as binding, rejecting Japan’s attempt to link nuclear tests to deal termination.
Given geopolitical dynamics, Japan is unlikely to undermine India, especially with shared concerns about China. The deal enables joint ventures for reactor construction, facilitating technology transfer and India’s NSG membership prospects.
Formulated in the 1950s by Dr. Homi Bhabha, this program leverages uranium and thorium reserves in monazite sands, especially in Kerala, for long-term energy independence, culminating in the Thorium Fuel Cycle.
In 1954, Asia’s first research reactor, APSARA, was installed, followed by CIRUS (Canada), Dhruva (indigenous, largest plutonium supplier for weapons), and BARC’s ZERLINA and PURNIMA I-II-III. Only DHRUVA operates today.
The Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research developed Kamini, Fast Breeder Test Reactor, and the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR), which achieved criticality in July 2024, marking a milestone in Stage 2.
The program includes:
Stage 1 (PHWR)
First Stage: Reactor Types
BWR
PHWR
PWR
India operates PWRs from Russia (VVER: Voda Voda Energy Reactor) and is negotiating with France for the Jaitapur EPR project (6x1650 MW).
Stage 2 (FBR)
Second Stage: Reactor Type
Fast Breeder Reactor
Stage 3 (AHWR)
AHWR: Advanced Heavy Water Reactor
Following CIRUS, the indigenous Dhruva reactor was developed to supply plutonium for weapons. Operation Smiling Buddha (May 1974) was India’s first nuclear test, described as a peaceful explosion. All devices were fission-based and sub-kiloton.
The Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), initially the London Club, emerged to control nuclear technology transfers, requiring NPT signature and IAEA safeguards. NSG membership requires:
In 2008, External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee addressed the NSG, committing to No First Use and a testing moratorium. The US secured a special waiver, allowing India to receive nuclear technology without NPT compliance.
1. No First Use
Three schools of thought—Pragmatism (favoring NFU), Maximalism (first use), and Rejectionism—debated the doctrine. Pragmatism prevailed, adopting NFU: India will not initiate nuclear use but will retaliate massively if attacked.
This requires a second-strike capability, achieved with the nuclear triad (Army, Navy, Air Force). INS Arihant, with Sagarika missiles, completed the triad, but 4–5 submarines are needed for credibility, under negotiation with Russia and France.
A 2003 modification allows nuclear retaliation against biological or chemical attacks, regardless of the attacker’s nuclear status, acting as a deterrent.
Debates persist on shifting to first use, driven by:
Advantages of No First Use:
Credible Minimum Deterrence
India maintains a minimum number of nuclear weapons to inflict unacceptable damage, tailored to adversaries’ societal, economic, and defense structures.
About:
Establishment:
Headquarter: Vienna, Austria.
Objective:
Operational Nuclear Power Plants in India:
Utilizing Available Resources: India has 70,000 tonnes of uranium and 360,000 tonnes of thorium. With uranium imports being costly and geopolitically sensitive, the 2025 Nuclear Energy Mission (Rs. 20,000 crore) prioritizes thorium-to-U-233 conversion and Small Modular Reactors (SMRs, 50–300 MW) for remote and industrial use.
Domestic uranium production has increased with new mines in Andhra Pradesh and Jharkhand, reducing import dependency.
Public Engagement and Legal Reforms: Address public opposition (e.g., Jaitapur protests) through transparent safety communication. Planned amendments to liability laws will facilitate private investment while ensuring national security.
Progress & Delays: The PFBR has entered its integrated commissioning phase following core loading in March 2024, with AERB approval granted in July 2024. Criticality was anticipated by March 2026, with full commissioning expected by September 2026. However, first-of-a-kind technical challenges have emerged, causing further delays. Authorities note that “these issues are being solved systematically.”
Why It Matters: As a key component of India’s three-stage nuclear programme, PFBR's activation is crucial for transitioning to Stage III (thorium-U³³ cycle), making these delays significant.
Budgetary Backing: The 2025–26 Union Budget announced a ₹20,000 crore commitment (~US $2.4 billion) under the Nuclear Energy Mission for Viksit Bharat, targeting the design and deployment of at least five indigenously developed SMRs by 2033. Legislative reforms are underway to enable private sector and foreign participation.
International Partnerships:
In early 2025, India and France signed a declaration of intent for collaboration on advanced and small modular nuclear reactors.
The US Government (DoE) has authorised Holtec International under regulation 10CFR810 to transfer its SMR-300 technology to Indian partners (L&T, Tata Consulting Engineers, and Holtec Asia), a significant step toward technology sharing.
Industry Push: NTPC, India's largest power producer, has initiated feasibility studies and issued a tender to explore deploying SMRs to replace aging coal-fired plants—an early private-sector move into nuclear energy.
PHWR Fleet Expansion: NPCIL is preparing to seek approval for constructing 10 new PHWRs (each 700 MW) in “fleet mode” to accelerate nuclear power capacity addition.
Ambitious Targets: India aims to ramp up to 22 GW of nuclear capacity by 2032 as part of its broader 100 GW Nuclear Energy Mission by 2047.
90 videos|488 docs|209 tests
|
1. What is the difference between fissile and fertile materials in the context of nuclear energy? | ![]() |
2. What is the significance of uranium enrichment in India's nuclear energy program? | ![]() |
3. What controversies and relations are associated with India's nuclear diplomacy? | ![]() |
4. What was the Indo-Japan Nuclear Deal and its implications? | ![]() |
5. What are the highlights of India's nuclear doctrine? | ![]() |