CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Notes  >  Legal Reasoning for CLAT  >  Important Legal Terms & Provisions in IPC

Important Legal Terms & Provisions in IPC | Legal Reasoning for CLAT PDF Download

A few comparisons between important and often confused terms are given below: 

Differences Between Culpable Homicide and Murder
Important Legal Terms & Provisions in IPC | Legal Reasoning for CLAT
Important Legal Terms & Provisions in IPC | Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Question for Important Legal Terms & Provisions in IPC
Try yourself:Culpable homicide is not a murder if done under:
View Solution

Differences Between Kidnapping and Abduction
Important Legal Terms & Provisions in IPC | Legal Reasoning for CLAT


Differences Between Acquittal and Discharge

Important Legal Terms & Provisions in IPC | Legal Reasoning for CLAT


Differences Between Compoundable Offence and Non-Compoundable Offence
Important Legal Terms & Provisions in IPC | Legal Reasoning for CLAT


Difference Between Bailable Offences and Non-Bailable Offences
Important Legal Terms & Provisions in IPC | Legal Reasoning for CLAT


Differences Between Cognizable Offences and Non-Cognizable Offences

Important Legal Terms & Provisions in IPC | Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Question for Important Legal Terms & Provisions in IPC
Try yourself:A cognizable offence under IPC has been defined
View Solution


Important Provisions in IPC

Important Legal Terms & Provisions in IPC | Legal Reasoning for CLAT

IPC Section-34 

  • Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intension. 

  • When a Criminal act is done by several people in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone.

IPC Section-82 

  • Act of any child under 7 years of age. 

  • Nothing is an offence which is done by a child under 7 years of age. 

IPC Section-85 

  • Act of a person incapable of judgement by reason of intoxication caused against his will. 

  • Nothing is which is done by a person who at the time of doing it, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law, provided that the thing which intoxicated him was administered to him without his knowledge or against his will.

IPC Section-149 

  • Every member of unlawful assembly is guilty of an offence committed in the Prosecution of the common object.

  • If an offence is committed by any member of unlawful assembly in prosecution of the common object of that assembly, or such as the member of that assembly knew to be likely to be committed in prosecution of that object, every person who, at the time of the committing of that offence, is a member of the same assembly is guilty of that offence.

IPC Section-268 

  • A person is guilty of public nuisance who does any act or is guilty of an illegal omission which causes any common injury, danger, or annoyance to the public or to the people in general who dwell or occupy property in the vicinity or which must necessarily cause injury, obstruction, danger or annoyance to persons who may have occasioned the use any public right. 

  • A common nuisance is not excused on the ground that it causes some conference or advantage.

IPC Section-269 

  • Negligent act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life. 

  • Whoever unlawfully or negligently does any act which is, which he knows or has reason to believe to be, likely to spread the infection of any disease dangerous to life, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to mouths, or with fine or with both. 

IPC Section-270 

  • Malignant act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life, whoever malignantly does any act which is and which he knows or has reason to believe to be, likely to spread the infection of any disease dangerous to life, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years or with fine or with both. 

IPC Section-286 

  • Negligent conduct with respect to explosive substance, whoever does, with any explosive substance, any act so rashly or negligently as to endanger human life, or to be likely to cause hurt or injury to any other person, or knowingly or negligently omits to take order with any explosive substance in his possession as is sufficient to guard against probable danger to human life from that substance shall be punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both: 

IPC Section-336 

  • Act endangering life or personal safety of others- whoever does any act so rashly or negligently as to endanger human life, or the personal safety of others, shall be punished with imprisonment of either descriptions for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees or with both. 

IPC Section-377 

  • Unnatural offences, whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order or nature with any man, woman or animal shall be punished with imprisonment for life or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten ears and shall also be liable to fine. 

  • Penetration is sufficient to Constitute the carnal intercourse necessary to the offence described in this Sectiontion.

IPC Section-391 

  • When five or more persons conjointly commit or attempt to commit a robbery, or where the whole number of persons conjointly committing or attempting to commit a robbery and persons present and aiding such commission or attempt, amount to five or more, every person so committing, attempting or aiding is said to commit 'dacoity'. 

IPC Section-441 

  • Whoever enters into or upon property in the possession of another with intent to commit an offence or to intimidate, insult or annoy and person in possession of such property, or having lawfully entered into or upon such property, unlawfully remains there with intent thereby to intimidate, insult or annoy any such person or with intent to commit an offence, is said to commit 'criminal trespass'. 

IPC Section-494 

  • Marrying again during lifetime of husband or wife whoever, having a husband or wife living, marries in any case in which such marriage is void by reason of its taking place during the life of such husband or wife, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.

The document Important Legal Terms & Provisions in IPC | Legal Reasoning for CLAT is a part of the CLAT Course Legal Reasoning for CLAT.
All you need of CLAT at this link: CLAT
115 videos|137 docs|50 tests

Top Courses for CLAT

FAQs on Important Legal Terms & Provisions in IPC - Legal Reasoning for CLAT

1. What is the difference between a legal term and a legal provision?
Ans. A legal term is a word or phrase that has a specific meaning in the legal context. It is a term used to describe a concept or principle in law. On the other hand, a legal provision refers to a specific section or clause within a law or statute that lays down the rules, rights, and obligations related to a particular subject matter.
2. What are some important provisions in the Indian Penal Code (IPC)?
Ans. Some important provisions in the Indian Penal Code (IPC) include Section 302 (Punishment for murder), Section 376 (Punishment for rape), Section 498A (Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty), Section 420 (Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), and Section 377 (Unnatural offenses).
3. Can you provide an example of an important legal term used in the IPC?
Ans. One example of an important legal term used in the IPC is "culpable homicide." This term refers to the act of causing the death of a person with the intention to cause death or with the knowledge that such an act may cause death. It is an essential term used in determining the nature and severity of the offense.
4. What is the difference between Section 302 and Section 304 of the IPC?
Ans. Section 302 of the IPC deals with the punishment for murder, which is intentionally causing the death of a person. On the other hand, Section 304 of the IPC deals with the punishment for culpable homicide not amounting to murder. It covers situations where there is no intention to cause death but the act results in the death of a person due to negligence or recklessness.
5. Can you explain the meaning of the legal term "cheating" as used in Section 420 of the IPC?
Ans. In Section 420 of the IPC, the term "cheating" refers to dishonestly inducing a person to deliver any property or valuable security or to consent to the retention thereof with the intention of dishonestly or fraudulently deceiving that person. It involves the act of intentionally deceiving someone in order to gain an unfair advantage or to cause them a loss.
115 videos|137 docs|50 tests
Download as PDF
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

Extra Questions

,

study material

,

past year papers

,

ppt

,

Free

,

Semester Notes

,

Viva Questions

,

Exam

,

Summary

,

video lectures

,

Important Legal Terms & Provisions in IPC | Legal Reasoning for CLAT

,

Objective type Questions

,

Sample Paper

,

Important Legal Terms & Provisions in IPC | Legal Reasoning for CLAT

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

pdf

,

practice quizzes

,

MCQs

,

mock tests for examination

,

Important Legal Terms & Provisions in IPC | Legal Reasoning for CLAT

,

Important questions

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

;