Occupational theory propounded by Nesfield advocates occupation as the lone factor for the development of this system. According to him, before this system priesthood was not the exclusive monopoly of Brahmins. But later on when hymns and rituals became more complex, a section of people got themselves specialized and became the Brahmins. Due to importance of sacrifices such people came to be more respected. Later they made this occupation hereditary. Chappel and Coon trace the origin of castes to the absorption of aboriginal types, and they also explain the formation of new castes with reference to the emergence of new occupations.
According to this theory, the Brahmins wanted to have a full control over the society in order to curb and rule them. So, their political interest created a caste system in India. Nibey Dubais, a French scholar, originally put forward this theory that was also supported by Indian thinkers such as Dr. Ghurey.
According to exponents of this theory, it is wrong to believe that castes came into being all of a sudden. It is the result of a long process of social evolution. They also argue that gradually and slowly many factors contributed to it. Some such factors which contributed in it included desire for purity of blood, devotion to a particular profession, theory of Karma and system of ancestral worship, colour prejudices, economics systems, conquest of one army by the other and geographical location and isolation. Their role differed from time to time but all these factors combined together helped in the emergence and strengthening of the caste system.
108 videos|242 docs
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|