Why in news:
About:
Types of Assisted Suicide
Arguments for:
Arguments Against:
Regulation:
India's stance on Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia
Landmark Judgment: In 2018, the Supreme Court of India legalized passive euthanasia under certain conditions, stating that it was a matter of "living will".
Conditions for Passive Euthanasia: An adult who is conscious and in a sound mind can refuse medical treatment or choose not to take medical treatment to accept death in a natural way.
Guidelines for "Living Will": The court laid down a set of guidelines for terminally ill patients who know about their chances of slipping into a permanent vegetative state to create a "living will."
Right to Life and Liberty: The rights of a patient in such cases would not fall outside the purview of Article 21 (right to life and liberty) of the Indian Constitution.
Aruna Shanbaug Case: The court's verdict was in line with its decision in the 2011 Aruna Shanbaug case, where passive euthanasia was allowed for the nurse who had been in a vegetative state for decades.
Inconsistencies: However, in 2014, another bench of the Supreme Court cited inconsistencies in earlier judgments on passive euthanasia, including the Shanbaug case, and referred the matter to a Constitution bench.
Why in news:
Introduction to Importance of Bhagwat Gita in Gandhi's Life:
The Process of Self-Realization:
Role of Action:
Ahimsa and Truth:
Serving God through the Service of Mankind:
Conclusion:
Why in news:
Against Caste System:
Taking Responsibilities during Adverse Times:
Inseparable Public and Private Life:
Relevance of Shastri's Values Today:
The case study involves Ramesh, a former theatre artist who was falsely accused of rape and later acquitted of all charges. Many years later, he discovers that an old news report about the incident still appears in online search results. Ramesh requests that the search engine and media outlet remove the results, citing the European Court of Justice's decision allowing individuals to submit such requests.
The issues at play in this case study include the right to privacy, the responsibility of internet search engines to present unbiased information, and the fear of being stigmatized based on past events. The following arguments can be made for making the Right to be Forgotten a fundamental right:
The right to a life with dignity of an individual who has been absolved of all charges in the past.
The responsibility of internet search engines to present unbiased information while not infringing on the right to privacy of an individual.
The fear of being dragged into one's past on disclosure of facts through the internet and the right to be forgotten.
However, it is important to consider the limitations of this right. Records of settled cases must remain in the public domain for legal recording and administrative purposes. People can access this information through the Right to Information Act. While the internet cannot be barred from providing information, in settled cases, search engines can add information about the resolution of the case along with related data so that anyone who surfs for the information must have the full context.
Additionally, infringement of fundamental rights can occur through actions by individuals or the state, but not through stereotyping, hatred, or bias. Ramesh can apply to the government for making changes with respect to page authors or search engines in his private capacity.
You are the Commissioner of the Municipal Corporation in a city that has experienced heavy rainfall in recent days. A housing society's boundary wall collapsed at midnight, resulting in the deaths of 12 workers, including two children, who were sleeping next to the wall. Upon investigation, you discover that the previous Municipal Commissioner, who is a close friend of yours, granted permission to construct the wall despite inappropriate soil conditions. Additionally, there were irregularities in the construction material, and other officials in your department are attempting to manipulate you. There appears to be a connection between the municipal department's officials and the builder. However, the builder is a close relative of one of the most powerful leaders of the ruling party and is attempting to threaten you.
A: What ethical issues arise in this situation, and what options are available to you to address them?
B: What actions do you propose to take in response to this scenario?Case and Facts
(i) Wall collapse led to the loss of human lives.
(ii) Construction material quality was poor.
(iii) Previous Municipal Commissioner is a close friend.
(iv) Pressure from colleagues and political party in power.Stakeholders Involved
(i) Victims
(ii) Previous Municipal Commissioner
(iii) Colleagues
(iv) Self
(v) BuilderIssues Involved
(i) Neglect of human dignity and disregard for poor lives.
(ii) Personal vs. professional relations with close friend.
(iii) Political pressure vs. duty to take action.Options Available
(i) Initiate disciplinary and criminal proceedings against wrongdoers.
(ii) Allow matter to calm down and let police investigate.Course of Action
1. Immediate Actions:
(i) Providing immediate medical support and compensation to the victims should be the utmost priority.2. Analysis of Evidence:
(i) Analysing the evidence of corruption.
(ii) Cross-checking and verifying the evidence to avoid false or mistaken allegations.3. Standard Operating Procedures:
(i) Following the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) of disciplinary action.
(ii) Reporting to the concerned higher authority.4. Dissociation:
(i) Dissociating self from the investigation as friendship with previous Commissioner might influence the proceedings and create a conflict of interest.
(ii) This would help avoid conflict of interest and ensure integrity, transparency and good governance.5. Legal Action:
(i) Initiating legal proceedings against the builder along with corrupt members of the department.
(ii) Not letting the political pressure affect the following SOPs.6. Reform Administration:
(i) Taking long-term steps to reform the administration to avoid such instances in the future.
(ii) Ensuring accountability and transparency in future construction contracts.
(iii) Encouraging social audits for effective governance.Conclusion:
When making decisions in such cases, personal relationships with colleagues should not be a factor. The Municipal Commissioner should prioritize honesty and integrity, and demonstrate strength and leadership. The situation calls for ethical impartiality, similar to Max Weber's principles, where personal relationships are put aside and civil service values are upheld.
The value of human life is more important than maintaining friendships or pursuing bureaucratic gains. As John Rawls stated in his theory of Justice, "Rights that are protected by justice are not up for negotiation or influenced by social interests." Therefore, the Municipal Commissioner must prioritize social justice as their main responsibility.
As a District Magistrate of a flood-prone district, you have been assigned the task of overseeing the construction of embankments in a low lying area of the river bed using a budget of 40 crore rupees allocated by the flood control department. However, the project has been delayed due to alleged corruption and mismanagement by a nexus of politicians and contractors, leading to the submergence of many villages during monsoon season. This has left thousands of people trapped, with a shortage of food, drinking water and the risk of an epidemic outbreak.
Despite severe pressure from political heads to cover up the corruption issue, as a District Magistrate, you need to take appropriate action to manage the situation and ensure the safety and well-being of the affected people.
(A) As a District Magistrate, what will be your course of action to manage the situation in the district?
(B) Identify the various dimensions of the crisis involved in the issue. Based on your understanding, suggest measures to deal with the crisis.
Ethical Dimensions:
(i) Denial of justice: Loss of homes and livelihood due to floods devastates lives of people, with no monetary compensation sufficient to ease their sorrow.
(ii) Lack of compassion and respect for human lives: Monetary gain and profit motives can lead to risking millions of lives by indulging in corruption.
(iii) Loss of faith in leaders: People elect leaders as their voice to address their grievances, but the nexus between representatives and contractors leave people helpless.Legal Dimensions:
(i) Corruption: Political leaders putting pressure on the District Magistrate or facing allegations of corruption is a dereliction of duty.
(ii) Governance failure: The government's failure to take timely measures to prevent a disaster in a flood-prone area and civil society's failure to act despite knowing about project delays, rule violations, and fund misuse.
(iii) Politicization of bureaucracy: Political pressure on the District Magistrate to cover up issues reveals a quid pro quo culture in the country's governance system.Measures to Deal with the Crisis:
(i) Show spirit of service and conviction: The District Magistrate must work tirelessly for people's rescue and rehabilitation and ensure strict action against culprits.
(ii) Ensure legal justice: Hold guilty parties accountable by facing trial in court, including contractors and politicians.
(iii) Take confidence-building measures: Initiate special schemes for creating livelihood opportunities and educating flood-affected children to regain trust in the government.(iv) Implement long-term flood prevention, mitigation, and adaptation measures: Build embankments and flood-resistant structures based on scientific analysis.
(v) Raise awareness among local people: Educate them about their rights and duty to ensure good governance, and promote citizen-centric governance as recommended by the 2nd ARC report. Make social audits mandatory for such projects.
39 videos|4115 docs|863 tests
|
39 videos|4115 docs|863 tests
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|