Doli Incapax | Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams PDF Download

Understanding Doli Incapax in Indian Law

Definition of Doli Incapax

• Doli incapax, or "incapable of wrongdoing," is a legal principle that shields children from criminal responsibility due to their inability to understand the consequences of their actions.
• It is presumed in India that children under the age of 7 lack the mental capacity to form criminal intent, thus granting them complete immunity from prosecution.

Key Principles of Doli Incapax

• Criminal liability should be reserved for those who have the intention to commit a crime.
• Children under 7 years old lack the mental maturity to grasp the outcomes of their actions, hence lacking the criminal intent or mens rea required for guilt.
• Legal protection is necessary for children due to their tender age and limited understanding.

Clear all your Judiciary Exams doubts with EduRev Join for Free

Join for Free

Age Limit for Doli Capax under IPC

• The age limit for Doli Capax as per the Indian Penal Code is set at below 7 years.
• Children below this age are considered incapable of comprehending the consequences of their behavior and are therefore exempt from criminal liability.

This structured content provides a detailed explanation of Doli Incapax in Indian law, covering its definition, key principles, and the age limit under the Indian Penal Code. The information is presented in a clear and organized manner, making it easier for students to grasp the concept effectively.

Doli Incapax in Indian Penal Code (IPC)

Absolute Immunity (Section 82)

• Section 82 of the IPC provides absolute immunity to children under 7 years of age from being held guilty of any offense.
• Children below the age of 7 are considered incapable of understanding right from wrong, thus exempt from criminal liability.
• This immunity extends not only to offenses under the IPC but also covers local and special laws.

Qualified or Partial Immunity (Section 83)

• Section 83 of the IPC offers partial immunity to children aged above 7 and below 12 years.
• If a child within this age group lacks the maturity to comprehend the nature and consequences of their actions, the act will not be deemed an offense.
• Various factors, such as the nature of the act and the child's behavior, are considered to assess the child's level of understanding.

For instance, consider a scenario where a 10-year-old steals a valuable item and sells it. If the child demonstrates awareness of the wrongful nature of the act, they may be held accountable for theft under Section 378 of the IPC.

Case Laws for Doli Incapax

Hiralal Mallick v. State of Bihar (1977)

• In this case, a 12-year-old boy named Hiralal Mallick, along with his two elder brothers, was convicted for causing fatal injuries to Arjan Mallick. Initially charged under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), their conviction was later modified to a lesser offense under Section 326 IPC by the High Court.
• The Supreme Court upheld Hiralal's conviction, emphasizing his understanding of the consequences of his actions despite his age. The court highlighted the individual assessment required in cases involving group criminal activities and the application of the Doli Incapax maxim.

Download the notes Doli Incapax

Download as PDF

Download as PDF

Kakoo v. The State of Himachal Pradesh (1976) SC

In this case, Kakoo, a 13-year-old, was convicted of raping a 2-year-old child. The court, considering his juvenile status and the principles of Doli Incapax, reduced his sentence to one year of rigorous imprisonment and a fine, emphasizing a reformative and humanitarian approach towards juvenile offenders.

Ulla Mahapatra v. The King (1950) Orissa HC

Ulla Mahapatra, an 11-year-old, was convicted of causing death with a knife. The Orissa High Court, considering his age, opted for a rehabilitative approach by sending him to a reformatory school instead of transportation.

Take a Practice Test Test yourself on topics from Judiciary Exams exam

Practice Now

Practice Now

Shyam Bahadur Koeri v. State of Bihar (1967) Patna HC

In this case, a child under 7 years of age was prosecuted under the Indian Treasure Trove Act of 1878 for not reporting a found gold plate. The Court, recognizing the child's doli incapax status, acquitted the child under the provisions of Section 82 of the IPC.

Conclusion

• In conclusion, the significance of the Doli Incapax principle lies in its role as a crucial safeguard in the legal realm, aiming to protect children from being held criminally liable. Acknowledging that young children lack the mental capacity to fully grasp the repercussions of their actions, Doli Incapax creates a protective framework, granting complete immunity to those below the age of 7, shielding them from any criminal accountability.
• Additionally, this principle provides partial immunity to children aged above 7 and below 12 who have not yet reached an adequate level of maturity in their understanding.