The ongoing situation in Manipur, marked by violence and unrest, has become a matter of national concern, especially in the context of national security. The contrasting responses from the Prime Minister to different crises highlight the varying levels of priority given to different issues within the country.
The political deadlock in Manipur has persisted for nearly two years, with no clear resolution in sight despite the severe impact of the violence, which has resulted in over 250 deaths and displaced thousands. The situation has been exacerbated by the lack of attention from national leadership, particularly Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who has not prioritized addressing the crisis in Manipur as he did with other incidents, such as the Pahalgam terror attack.
The recent military stand-off between India and Pakistan was met with a prompt and serious response, reflecting public sentiment about the need to combat cross-border terrorism. In contrast, the ongoing crisis in Manipur, despite its human toll and political implications, has not received the same level of national attention or urgency.
The treatment of Manipur by New Delhi differs significantly from that of Kashmir, highlighting a broader pattern in the Northeast policy. Manipur is viewed through the lens of national security and regime preservation, rather than the unique local realities and challenges it faces.
Aspect | Manipur | Kashmir |
---|---|---|
Threat Perception | Considered a minor security issue despite recent violence | Recognized as a critical national security concern involving Pakistan and China |
External Involvement | Historical support from China and Pakistan is now minimal and outdated | Ongoing geopolitical tensions with Pakistan and China |
Recent Framing Attempts | Efforts to portray Kuki groups as cross-border threats | Long-standing perception of Kashmir as a geopolitical flashpoint |
There have been attempts by civil society and security experts to shift the blame onto Kuki militants, such as the claims made by the Chief Minister's office about Kuki militants posing a threat. However, these narratives often overlook the real and emerging threats, particularly the rise of Valley-Based Insurgent Groups (VBIGs) since May 3, 2023.
The 'buffer zone' established after Home Minister Amit Shah's visit in May 2023, aimed at separating the Meitei-dominated valleys from the Kuki-Zomi-Hmar hill regions, reflects the ongoing struggle to maintain order in the state.
The focus of New Delhi appears to be more on political optics rather than genuine reform in Manipur. Since Operation All-Clear in 2004, there have been missed opportunities for significant improvements in various areas such as:
New Delhi's push to scrap the Free Movement Regime with Myanmar and invest over ₹31,000 crore to fence the 1,643 km India-Myanmar border, including the 398 km stretch in Manipur, reflects an outdated security perspective. This hardline approach seems to be a response to majoritarian insecurities from valley-based groups and aligns with political interests rather than current security needs.
Issue | Impact/Explanation |
---|---|
Security Justification | The security rationale for the fencing policy is viewed as excessive and not aligned with present-day threats. |
Ethnic Opposition | Ethnic groups, particularly the Nagas and Mizos, oppose the fencing plan as it disrupts traditional transborder communities and relationships. |
Political Benefit | The policy is seen as a means to consolidate political power and strengthen local patronage networks, rather than a genuine security measure. |
Act East / Neighbourhood Policy | The fencing initiative may undermine India's Act East policy and neighborhood relations, alienating border populations and negatively impacting diplomatic ties. |
National security policies related to arms management are criticized for being more about public perception than effective reform. For instance:
The combination of easy access to arms and the lack of a credible state response perpetuates the ethnic security dilemma in Manipur. The imposition of President's Rule on February 13, 2025, following internal strife within the BJP and a change in leadership, serves as a symbolic warning to armed groups about the intolerance for violence. However, the necessary enforcement and systemic reforms remain inadequate.
A gradual return to normalcy in Manipur may open the door for serious political discussions with opposing groups, focusing on genuine demands and rebuilding trust in government institutions. The differing commemorations of May 3 by rival parties illustrate the political exploitation of the situation. Ultimately, resolving the political impasse and restoring law and order will require substantive policy changes that transcend mere political posturing and prioritize effective governance.
Low retail inflation is encouraging news for both consumers and policymakers.
April’s retail and wholesale inflation data show a substantial decrease, reaching a 69-month low for retail and a 13-month low for wholesale inflation. This positive shift reflects the effectiveness of recent monetary measures and government interventions, benefiting both the public and policymakers. The decline in key food prices, coupled with improved supply management and liquidity conditions, indicates a gradual control over inflationary pressures.
For the public: Confirms the continued easing of prices observed earlier in the year.
For policymakers: Validates the control over last year’s high inflation and supports the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) recent interest rate cuts.
Efforts contributing to easing inflation include:
Potential RBI monetary policy response: Likely to encourage further interest rate cuts in June, contingent on upcoming GDP growth data.
The latest inflation trends indicate that the Reserve Bank of India may consider further interest rate cuts, depending on upcoming GDP data. Additionally, the government needs to address fuel pricing policies to maintain credibility. Despite these positive developments, the future of inflation remains contingent on factors such as the monsoon and trade uncertainties, necessitating ongoing vigilance for sustained economic stability and growth.
52 videos|5374 docs|1136 tests
|
1. What is the main issue concerning Manipur as discussed in the editorial? | ![]() |
2. How has the government responded to the Manipur crisis according to the editorial? | ![]() |
3. What are the historical factors contributing to the Manipur issue? | ![]() |
4. What solutions does the editorial propose for resolving the Manipur issue? | ![]() |
5. Why is the Manipur issue considered a paradox in the context of governance? | ![]() |