The Hindu Editorial Analysis- 20th August 2025 | Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly - UPSC PDF Download

Making India’s climate taxonomy framework work

Why is it News?

 The introduction of the climate finance taxonomy is crucial as it coincides with important developments in India's climate finance landscape. 

Introduction

The taxonomy serves as a foundational tool to mobilize climate-aligned investments, prevent greenwashing, and clarify for investors which sectors, technologies, and practices are conducive to mitigation, adaptation, or transition. It is presented as a "living framework", capable of adapting to India's changing priorities and international commitments. However, its success as a governance tool hinges on how effectively this adaptability is put into practice.

The Review Architecture

Reference Framework

The review mechanism for India’s taxonomy can draw lessons from the Paris Agreement’s Article 6.4 Mechanism. The Article 6.4 Supervisory Body uses a legal and editorial review system for climate market instruments. Adopting similar principles would strengthen investor confidence, ensure legal clarity, and align India with domestic and international standards.

Two-Tier Review System for Climate Finance Taxonomy

Periodic (Annual) Reviews

• Designed for timely course correction.
• Triggered by implementation gaps, international obligations, stakeholder feedback, or policy changes.
• Must follow a structured and predictable process, with:
• Fixed timelines
• Clear documentation protocols
• Mandatory public consultation

Comprehensive (Five-Year) Reviews

• A deeper reassessment of the taxonomy’s relevance and robustness.
• Considers emerging trends in carbon markets, shifts in global climate finance definitions, and lessons from sectoral transitions.
• Aligned with India’s five-year NDC update cycle and the global stocktake process under the UNFCCC.

Outcome

This dual-level review system will keep the taxonomy both responsive in the short term and resilient in the long term.

The Substantive Aspect of the Review

Two Core Aspects of Review

Legal coherence

• Assess the taxonomy’s alignment with India’s Energy Conservation Act, SEBI norms, Carbon Credit Trading Scheme, and international obligations.
• Ensure enforceability, remove redundancies, and harmonise terms to avoid overlaps.
• Identify interdependencies between climate finance mandates and other measures like green bonds, blended finance schemes, and environmental risk disclosures to prevent revisional inconsistencies.

Substantive Content Clarity

• Maintain a readable, coherent, and technically precise framework.
• Update definitions to match evolving market standards, ensuring usability for both experts and non-experts.
• Revise quantitative thresholds (e.g., GHG reduction targets, energy efficiency benchmarks) with empirical data and stakeholder inputs.

Inclusivity and Accessibility

• Ensure accessibility for MSMEs, the informal sector, and vulnerable communities, which are key to net-zero goals but face compliance barriers.
• Provide simplified entry points, staggered compliance timelines, and proportionate expectations, especially in agriculture and small-scale manufacturing.

Institutionalising Accountability

Institutional Mechanism

• The Ministry of Finance should set up a standing unit within the Department of Economic Affairs or form an expert committee.
• This body should include financial regulators, climate science institutions, legal experts, and civil society representatives.

Transparency Tools

• Develop public dashboards to collect inputs, record implementation experiences, and publish review reports.
• Ensure the taxonomy evolves in a predictable and transparent manner.

Review Process

• Publish annual review summaries and five-year revision proposals in a consolidated, publicly accessible format.
• This will enhance investor confidence and improve ease of access.

Policy Alignment

• Coordinate the taxonomy with related instruments such as India’s carbon market mechanisms, disclosure obligations, and green bond frameworks.

Contextual Relevance

• The rollout comes at a time when:
• The Carbon Credit Trading Scheme is moving towards full operationalisation.
• Green bonds are becoming mainstream, even in stock market portfolios.
• There is growing pressure to align public investment flows with long-term climate goals.

Conclusion

A poorly designed or unclear taxonomy can weaken these initiatives. For a “living document” to serve its purpose, it must be supported by continuous review, open revisions, and structured participation. It is therefore essential that these elements are integrated into the final climate taxonomy framework.

Sedition redux

Why in News?

New sedition law threatens freedom of expression further. 

Introduction

The increasing misuse of police authority to target journalists highlights the vulnerability of press freedom in India. The recent summons by the Assam Police under Section 152 of the BNS demonstrates how rebranded sedition laws are being weaponized against dissent. In the absence of judicial safeguards, such actions pose a risk of silencing critical voices and undermining the democratic framework.

Misuse of Police Powers Against Journalists

Filing baseless cases and summoning journalists without adequate evidence has become a common strategy in states governed by intolerant political leadership.

The Assam Police recently summoned Siddharth Varadarajan (Founding Editor, The Wire) and Karan Thapar (Consulting Editor, The Wire) under Section 152 of the BNS.

This action reflects a pattern of intimidation and suppression of press freedom.

Assam Police’s Actions and Their Timing

The summons were issued by the Guwahati Crime Branch in connection with a new sedition FIR on August 12, 2025.

This timing coincided with the Supreme Court’s notice on The Wire’s petition challenging the constitutionality of Section 152.

• On the same day, the Court had also protected the journalists from coercive action, making the Assam Police’s move egregious and defiant.
• Another summons, linked to a case at Morigaon Police Station, reportedly relates to The Wire’s report on Operation Sindoor.

The summons were procedurally flawed, lacking essential details such as:

• FIR date
• Details of the alleged offense
• Copy of the FIR

Such omissions, despite being mandatory under BNSS, indicate police intimidation.

Section 152 – A Rebranded Sedition Law

Critics had raised concerns that Section 152 is merely a revamped version of the colonial-era sedition law (Section 124A).

However, Section 152 is more expansive and poses greater dangers because:

• It lowers the threshold for prosecution by using vague terms like “knowingly.”
• It permits action even without malicious intent, unlike Section 124A which required proof of intent.
• The ambiguity surrounding terms like “sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India” facilitates broad misuse.

Even legitimate criticism of government policies could be interpreted as a threat to national unity.

The law creates a chilling effect on free expression and enables the targeting of dissenters.

Judicial Oversight and the Way Forward

•  The Supreme Court’s involvement in The Wire’s case underscores the potential misuse of Section 152. 
• However, the Assam Police’s defiance highlights the necessity for stronger judicial safeguards and clear guidelines.
• It is imperative for the Court to declare such sedition laws—whether colonial or rebranded—as unconstitutional.
•  Such laws have no place in a democratic society where dissent and press freedom are fundamental pillars of governance. 

Conclusion

•  The controversy surrounding Section 152 reinforces concerns about its chilling effect on free speech. 
• By lowering the threshold for prosecution, it empowers state authorities to intimidate critics.
•  Only through judicial intervention and the rejection of unconstitutional sedition laws can India protect its democracy, uphold journalistic freedom, and ensure that dissent remains a crucial aspect of public discourse.