Principal: A gift comprising existing property is valid and a gift comprising future property is void.
Facts: ‘X’ has a house which is owned by him. He contracted to purchase a plot of land adjacent to the said house, but the sale (of the plot of land) in his favour is yet to be completed. He makes a gift of both the properties (house and land) to ‘Y’.
Contract is said to have three essentials. Which one among the following is not an essential in the formation of contract?
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App |
Rania applied for the post of Director in an organization. The governing body of the organization passed a resolution appointing him to the post. Afterwards, one of the members of the governing body informed him privately of the resolution. Subsequently, the resolution was rescinded by the governing body. Rania files a suit for breach of contract and claims damages.
Q. Which one of the following is the correct legal proposition in the case?
A contract enforceable at the instance of one party is known as:
X duly posts a letter of acceptance to Y, but the letter is lost in transit by the negligence of the Post Office
Principle: A contract is an agreement enforceable by law.
Facts: X invited Y to her house for dinner. Y accepted the invitation but later did not go. On Y's failure to attend, X filed a suit against Y for the price of non-consumed food.
Q. Can this agreement be enforced by law?
Principle: An agreement to do an act impossible in itself is void.
Facts: Rajdeep, a shipping magnate and wildlife enthusiast entered into an agreement with Karan as per which the latter was be paid Rupees five lacs in addition to expenses incurred by him if he caught a live anaconda in the Gir Forest area of India within a period of one year from the date of agreement. It is common knowledge that anaconda is endemic to South America.
Principle: The consideration or object of an agreement must be lawful. It should not be forbidden by law and should not defeat the provisions of any law. It should not be fraudulent or injure any person or property. The Court should not regard it as immoral or opposed to public policy.
Explanation – Every agreement of which the object or consideration is unlawful is void.
Facts: Rohan has a very perverted mind and he tells Saad who is desperately in need of money that, “I will pay you ₹5000 to whip yourself”. Saad agrees and takes the money. Later, he refuses to whip (Chabuk for horse) himself.
Q. What is the status of the contract?
Principle: The communication of proposals, their acceptance and revocation are deemed to be made by any act or omission of the party proposing, accepting or revoking by which he intends to communicate such proposal acceptance or revocation, or which has the effect of communicating it.
Explanation – The communication of an acceptance is complete, as against the proposer, when it is put in a course of transmission to him, so as to be out of the power of the acceptor; as against the acceptor, when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer.
Facts – The only daughter of Mrs Aggarwal went missing. She put a notice in the newspaper stating a reward for anyone who could find her. The reward was ₹40000. Ms Shivani Bagul was a long-time friend of Mrs Aggarwal. She came to know of the reward but due to her bond with Mrs Aggarwal, she set out to search for the missing girl. She found Mrs Aggarwal’s daughter Shweta and returned her to her mother.
Q. Is Shivani entitled to the reward?
“A” offers to sell his car to “B” for Rs. 50,000/-. “B” agrees to buy the car offering Rs.45, 000/-. The reply of “B” amounts to:
When goods are displayed in a show – window bearing price tags, it indicates:
Principle: A person is said to be of sound mind for the purpose of making a contract if, at the time when he makes it, he is capable of understanding it and of forming a rational judgment as to its effect upon his interests.
Facts: Mr. X who is usually of sound state of mind, but occasionally of unsound state of mind, enters into a contract with Mr. Y when he was of unsound state of mind. Mr. Y having come to know about this fact afterwards wants to file a suit against Mr. X.
Principle: Every person, who is of the age of majority, is competent to contract according to the law to which he is subject.
Facts: A minor mortgaged his house in favour of Thakur Das, a money lender, to secure a loan
of Rs. 20000. A part of this, i.e. Rs. 10500 was actually advanced to him. While considering the proposed advance, the attorney who was acting for the money lender, received information that the plaintiff was still a minor. Subsequently the minor commenced an action stating that he was underage when he executed the mortgage and the same should, therefore, be cancelled. He prayed for setting aside the mortgage. The mortgagee money lender prayed for the refund of Rs. 10500 from the minor.
Principle: Agreements, the meaning of which is not certain, or not capable of being made certain, are void.
Facts: A horse was bought for a certain price coupled with a promise to give Rs.500 more if the horse is proved lucky.
All contracts are agreements
All agreements are accepted offers
Q. Which of the following derivation is correct?
Legal Principle 1: Acceptance of an offer is complete when the acceptance is put into the course of transmission so as to be out of the power of the acceptor
Legal Principle 2: Acceptance once completed, makes the agreement binding on both the parties
Facts: A accepts to buy B’s offer of his motor car for Rs. 4 Lakhs. The acceptance was put into e-mail. Unfortunately, when the e-mail was put, there is distortion as a result of which B is not in a position to really read what A has written
Legal Principle: A contract is an agreement which the law will enforce. All agreements are contracts if they are made with free consent by parties competent to contract for a lawful consideration and with a lawful contract
Facts: A, a 40 yrs. old businessman of sound mind agrees of his own free will to sell his bungalow worth Rs. 10 Lakhs for Rs. 1 Lakh. The agreement
I. Is invalid because of inadequate consideration
II. Is valid because there is lawful consideration
III. Is valid because it was entered into with the free consent
IV. Is valid because X has capacity to contract
Legal principle: A contract requires a proposal and an acceptance of the proposal. It is necessary to make a binding contract, not only that the proposal be accepted, but also that the acceptance is notified to the proposer.
Facts: D sent his servant P to trace his child. D in the meantime announced a reward for providing information about the missing boy. P, in ignorance of the announcement traced the boy and informed D. P later on came to know and he claimed it.
Q. Issue: is the servant entitled to reward
A situation when two parties make identical offers to each other in ignorance of each other offer is known as
The agreement which is not legally enforceable is known as
An offer was sent by post, the acceptor wrote accepted on the letter, put it in his drawer & forgot about it. The transaction is
‘A’ offers to sell his car to ‘B’ for Rs. 50,000. ‘B’ agrees to buy the car offering Rs. 45,000. The reply of ‘B’ amounts to
Mistake of both the parties about the subject matter renders an agreement
‘A’ contracts to pay ‘B’ Rs. 1,000 if the B’s house is burnt. This is a
‘A’ and ‘B’ contract to marry each other. Before the date fixed for marriage, ‘A’ goes mad. The contract becomes…………………..