[ENGLISH] UPSC Prelims 2017 Analysis Part 2 Video Lecture | UPSC Prelims Previous Year Paper Discussions (Hindi)

hello friends I welcome you all to this
discussion lecture series for civil
services brilliance 2007 in Christian
paper my name is dr. Marie balancing
Radford and in this part 2 of the
division series I will be discussing the
questions of history art and culture
quality and international relations so
all the other topics you will find in
part 1 will be discussed by booming
Hasani man so history had 14 questions
this year the usual no change in the
number of degrees or in he had 22 great
injuries past few years the number of
questions from quality had gone down
international relations 3 study IQ has
launched its Android and tablet courses
for you PSC is examination so those of
you who are providing for 2018 and want
to prepare from their home and do not
want to go to any metro cities you can
avail our pen drive and a bread courses
or Android courses if you order today
that is 28th of June you will get a flat
discount of 5000 on using this code UPSC
580 but this is only for today 28 June
ok so let us begin with history art and
culture series first questions in the
context of Tinian history the principle
of diarchy refers to was a division of
central legislature into two houses no
that was bicameralism introduction of
double government central and state
government no having two sets of rulers
one in London and another in Delhi no
this was the division of subjects
delegated to provinces into two
categories
remember the 1919 Government of India
act this had delegated the provinces
into provincial adminstration to two
departments two types of departments one
there administered by Indians and others
were kept by the governor of the
province to himself using his own
Council they were covered so the so the
direct question asks from 1919
Government of India act dial key second
question from culture the painting of
bodhisattva vajrapani is one of the most
famous and off Atilla strated paintings
so if pain is Artemis at Ajanta and
other peers as well Babar also contain
the answer is a delta now you will
remember such kind of questions only if
you have studied art and culture using
Internet you have seen the images you
have seen the videos such
can be solved only in that manner see if
you would have looked at this image this
is woody suppose I'm a bunny it is a
very famous painting it is often used on
the covers of history books so this is a
bodhisattva is holding a lotus satisfies
called Padma pani and this was at Ajanta
so always remember study art in culture
using internet watch the images watch
the videos of dance etcetera that is the
only method you can solve such kind of
questions again from culture the
traditions of different communities
virtually outside Cindy nun garage
Jastrow won't know and bodywork re son
tal know this is also wrong the answer
was one only since allegiance Abe is is
a festival celebrated in Omaha's
mega-blast Nagar is near near Mumbai and
this is a Township which has a lot of
Cindy people who migrated from Sindh
after partition and so they celebrate
this jealous type the at that place in a
larger number as London Anna deavere a
chakra is once every various okay it is
in bootephant
remember number daily biosphere reserve
National Park bodywork re is is a type
of pilgrimage in dark earth where there
is a temple of Lord wittle wittle is
Lord metal is a of thought of Lord
Vishnu
okay so body worker is in Maharashtra
pan dark wood not golden son tall so
these were the correct answers answer
was a one only another question from art
and culture famous for Sun Temple which
place is famous for Sun Temple now I saw
early American tax and home Kailash
worth this question could be solved
using elimination if you know home
koresh well this is very famous home
Quraysh where is one of the twelve
jyothirlinga India do fillings are the
temples of lord shiva
so nice for even multiple dish if you
know whom carranger is a joke there is
the totalling it is not sun temple so
you can directly eliminate three options
so your answer is one so even if you
have never heard of personally you can
take this this is the village in shreeka
column near chicago l'm in under pradesh
and elimination method using totalling
so answer was one only next question was
regarded regarding the chronology of
events of Indian national
moment as I always tell that don't mug
up the ears but remember what happened
first what happened after so sequence of
events is more important rather than
mugging of the ears nor mutiny in the
Indian Navy Royal Indian maybe this was
in 1946 in mutiny quit India movement
launched quit India movement was
launched in 1942 and second round table
conference was in early 1930s in 31 so
first was this three to one so we have
our answer three to one which of the
following was a very important seaport
in al-fatihah Kingdom now this question
let me tell you I personally feel this
question was not supposed to be
attempted because if you are a general
studies history student you are not
expected to move so much deep into all
the dynasties and their rules their
seaports their administration trade
etcetera you do not have time for that
if you go so much deep into history you
won't have time for other subjects the
same is there for all these other
subjects as well there is a limit until
which you should go you should not go
too much deep and waste your time yes if
you know about this you have read it
somewhere very good excellent especially
if someone has history of their optional
or they might know this but otherwise I
personally feel this question was not
supposed to be attempted the answer here
is motive only see Kakinada multiple en
masse will affect them they are all
situated on the underbridge coast and
they were all the nearby nearby only and
they are all part of the kakatiya
kingdom but motive only is the answer it
is famous because in 1293 Marco Polo the
famous traveler from Venice who visited
China and Marco Polo also had come to
India he had visited more to Pearlie
here visiting he has written about
kakatiya Kingdom now this ever be a
dynasty
it's a festivals for angle and it was
eventually conquered by the Delhi
Sultanate remember a lot in Hindi
southern campaign under Malika hood so
this was one of those dynasties that he
defeated next question is regarding
Butler committee of 1927 what is the
objects of the purpose of this committee
defining the jurisdiction of central and
provincial governments defining the
powers of secretary of state of India
censorship
rest or improve the relationship between
government of India and Indian states
the answer is States and government of
India
actually this committee was sent so that
the relationship between these native
princely states the princely states and
the British amount power and we
determine it can be improved so what is
paramount power the British were
paramount power in India they were all
Hindi all these princely kingdoms who
had signed subsidiary alliances with
them they were all subordinate they were
all under the British Empire so that is
why it is called the paramount power and
this was answer is D determined the
relationship consider the following as
Radek on babe first president of British
Indian Association the Zulu Dutch - whoo
check on the founder of Madras Mahajan
Sabha soon and enhance energy founder of
Indian Association now these all are
precursor to Indian National Congress
this question has been asked because
these all they're there as political
organizations before Congress was
founded so this is correct lolicon Dave
and this is correct this is wrong so
answer is one entity only with reference
to religious history of India consider
the following statements South America
and some idea of less sex organism this
is wrong no they were sects of Buddhism
no service dividend held that the
constituents of phenomena were not only
momentary but existed forever in a
latent form which of the following
statements is correct now statement one
is wrong statement two is correct answer
is only all these are put this schools
South America some idea and this error
Swami service division is also a
philosophy in Buddhism only so these are
all related to Buddhism the answer was B
with reference to difference between
culture of regulating audience and Indus
Valley people which of these are correct
now three treatments are given here we
have to determine which of them
correctly shows the difference between
our ends and Indus Valley people
now drink Vedic Aryans use coat of nail
and helmet in warfare and Indus Valley
Civilisation did not leave any evidence
of using them this is correct
Indus Valley Civilisation was a
peace-loving civilization
have found no weapons but Aryans had
weapons there they were world like
people they fought they fought a lot of
wars these wars are mentioned in relived
second drink Vedic Aryans new gold
silver copper whereas Indus Valley
Civilisation people knew only copper and
iron this is wrong because Indus Valley
people did not know about iron so second
option is wrong now third option is a
bit tricky it says that drink Lehrer
Koreans had domesticated the horse yes
this is true where if there is no
evidence of indus valley people having
been aware of this animal now this is a
tricky treatment see if you look at it
in a generalized manner yes indus valley
people did not have horse as a part of
their civilization but we have found two
evidences of horse at sudana and Lothal
we have found horse bones and a terra
cotta figurine so this statement is
wrong answer will be 1 only
but UPSC can consider this also as
correct it depends on what you PSC
examiner's think is right if you take it
as a very generalized statement this
might be correct but personally I feel
this is wrong and answer will be one but
it might be see also 1 & 3 we have to
see next year when the official answer
key comes out the thing that you had to
remember here was island was not found
in IVC that is why second answer Falls
wrong and Horus evidence has been
founded Lothal and sued coda another
question from culture this reference to
money booty some key is none which of
the following treatments are correct
first it is a song and dance performance
yes this is correct symbols are used are
the only musical instruments used in
performance whenever you see such words
only 100% you should be very careful
read the answer again read the options
once again read the statements carefully
because only 100%
these statements are often false so be
careful in this I am not saying they're
always false but they are often false
that is what I have seen
now symbols are small instruments they
are too small metal plates that are used
together to make sounds well song and
dance performances are going on third
statement says that it is performed to
narrate the life and deeds of Lord
Krishna
yes this is correct remember money booty
is a big center of money poor is a big
center of nationalism it is a region
where wisdom was developed and all the
manipulatives as well the classical
dance that also has Krishna's life
stories as an important theme so answer
here is one and three only now money
police and Kieran was in news in
December 2013 because it was added to
the representative list of UNESCO
intangible cultural heritage of humanity
although this is three and a half years
old but still we can see that UPSC has
been asking questions of very old
current affairs so it's not just at
eleven or twelve months is sufficient
now you have to read up more amount of
current advice you have to read up at
least two three years now I know it is
very tough but this is this is how tough
competition is if you have to succeed
you have to do it remember drumming is
there so that symbol statement is wrong
because drums are also used in this
performance and stories of Krishna are
told it is practiced primarily by the
question of community next question is
asking who are the people associated
with realised settlement during the
British rule now Lord Cornwallis cannot
be there because he was the one who
brought in permanent settlement in 1893
dist eliminated this you have a you will
have our answer even if you do not
remember these names
Alexander Reid and Thomas Monroe they
were the people who are instrumental in
bringing Reyes by settlement in 1820 but
here Lord Cornwallis can be eliminated
and you can get your answer easily while
we are in on this topic tell me which
year did Lord Cornwallis bring in
permanent settlement okay
this is a question for you write down
write it down in comment section the
trade dispute Act of 1929 was provided
for now this trade dispute Act was
brought in to dine on to bring a ban on
strikes there was a huge strike in 1926
the British became very much scared of
strike they brought in a new law for
this they brought a new act it is called
the trade dispute Act
consider the following treatments
factories act of 1881 was passed with a
view to fix the pages of industrial
and allow the workers to form trade
unions nm local day was pioneer in
organizing the labor movement in British
India this is correct nm lupin day is
often called as the father of trade
union movement now this first statement
read it carefully do you think the
British were so liberal they were so
much of they were showing so much of
welfare activity that they would pick
the wages they would pick the salaries
of the members the mill workers the
Industrial Workers know even if you
don't know what the factories Act wanted
said if you just remember it was in 1881
you can guess that know this this such
kind of things could not have happened
okay no fixing of wages could have ever
happened so answer is to only so what
did this first act act in 1881 say it
said that anyone who is under the age of
7 those children are not allowed to work
they are prohibited and those who are
under age of 12 they're working ours
will be placed the working conditions of
the labourers was the main thing that
was the remedied in first Factory Act
there were some few concessions like
there will be a lunch break of half an
hour etcetera so there was no fixing of
wage there was no liberty to pomp date
unions it came on slowly later on but
first Factory Act only the working
conditions were looked after and loken
day is the father of trade union
movement in India so after seeing these
these two questions I think there is a
train this year asking about the
questions that are not related to
national movement directly so all the
alternate histories that were going on
alternate chapters of the history like
trade union movements factories Act
history of communism about MN Roy read
upon goes if someone is attempting CF EF
exam that is coming soon that will be
these will be very important for that
that exam okay
so such friends you BAC often carries on
so be aware of this coming on to the
quality questions there were 22
questions from quality first question
for election to the Lok Sabha a
nomination typically filed by anyone
residing in India obviously not there
are a lot of people from other countries
residing in India can they fight
elections you know a resident of the
constituency from which the election is
to be contested you must have seen there
are lot of elect politicians who go and
fight election
from other state for other constituency
so there is also wrong any citizen of
India whose name appears in the
electoral roll of a constituency yes
this is correct you have to be a
registered voter be eligible for filing
your nomination any citizen of India no
if some citizen of India has criminal
cases proved against him he cannot fight
elections best example Lalu Prasad Yadav
so there are restrictions on some
citizens so this is the correct one any
citizen of India was named by Pearson
link total Road
consider the following statements in
election for law Sabha or straight
assembly the winning candidate must get
at least 15% of the wars is that correct
no we have politicians who've been
elections even upgrading 25% 30% of the
board because be in India follow the
first-past-the-post system in that in
this system even if you are getting 30%
and if your opponents are getting less
than you 27 28 percent then you are
declared of dinner it is not necessary
to get 50 percent so the statement is
wrong according to provisions laid down
in the Constitution of India loops of
other speakers Post goes to the majority
party and deputy speakers to the
opposition now this is nowhere written
in the Constitution that this post has
to go to the majority or ruling party
this is a convention it has formed after
independence that yes it has been the
trend it is a convention that has formed
over the period of time so our answer is
neither one nor two so speaker is chosen
from among the members of Lok Sabha it
is by convention it is a member of the
ruling party or Alliance usually and
Deputy Speaker goes to the opposition
so right now Smitha Mahajan is the
speaker of Lok Sabha she is a member of
BJP
the right to vote and to be elected in
India is fundamental right natural right
Constitution right or legal right the
answer to this is legal right okay now
this is derived from the Constitution
but it is not the constitutional right
fundamental it is not there obviously
you know you have read all the
mental rates does it say anywhere that
the fundamental right would no natural
Constitution and legal here it really
legal right because of some legal
provisions we have the right see it
originates from the article 326 of the
Constitution which talks about the
Voting Rights but it has been shaped by
the RT a representation of people act
nineteen fifty one because of this act
we have all the rules and regulations
that who can vote who can represent who
can file nominations etc now if you're
if you have non-residents you do not
live in that area you have unsound brain
if you are involved in crime or corrupt
or illegal practices you are not
eligible to vote you can beat this part
from boating by the Election Commission
so it is up to the Commission according
to the rules of our PA representation of
people like so it is a legal right given
according to the laws of India not in
the Constitution it is only derived from
the article 326 answer to the following
treatment Election Commission of India
is a five-member body you're wrong it is
a three member body Union Ministry of
Home Affairs decides the election
schedule for the conduct of general and
by-elections this is also wrong Election
Commission of India decides the election
schedule remember you must have seen
conferences by the Election Commission
each time before elections they have a
press conference which is widely covered
they tell you all the dates when the
model code of conduct comes into play
when the nomination what is the last day
to file the nominations the last day to
take back your nomination and so on okay
so all that schedule is given by
Election Commission prior to the
elections Election Commission resolve
the disputes regarding splits mergers of
recognized political parties yes this is
correct the answer is three only if you
remember the Samajwadi Party split that
happened in 2017 early 2017 before the u
k-- elections remember all the all the
politicians from both those groups were
going to election information again and
again they were trying to get that
Samajwadi Party symbol so the mergers
the split they are decided the they are
decided by election commission giving
them recognition or not which group has
to be given official recognition and the
Election Commission of India website
clearly states I have taken these lines
from there only the Election Commission
besides the scheduled for elections has
to take account of weather during winter
constituency's may be snow bound during
monsoon access to remote areas
restricted agriculture cycles so that
all the farmers are not busy when
elections are growing going on and you
have to see the schedule of the exam
exams in schools colleges etc so you see
a lot of things have to be taken care of
religious and festivals public holidays
so after checking up on all these things
the schedule is decided by EC is these
are the three current commissioners
Chief Election Commissioner dr. Nadine
Jerry
CAK Jyoti and home Prakash Rawat
Election Commissioner in India judicial
review implies now this is an analytical
question from gyration review first
statement says that the power of
judiciary to pronounce upon
constitutionality of laws and executive
orders yes this might be correct let us
read the other options power of
judiciary question the wisdom of the
laws enacted by legislators yes kind of
wisdom can be challenged third power of
judiciary to review all the legislative
enactments before they are ascended to
by the president no before it will be
getting the assent from president before
becoming an act how can they go in
between the parliamentary procedure
judiciary cannot intervene at that time
so this is completely wrong the power of
judiciary to review its own judgments
given earlier in similar different cases
this is not judicial review this is the
judicial review best option by because
here they are talking about executive
orders and laws so they are talking
about judicial checks and balances over
the legislature as well as the SD
executive part of the government see
this is the definition of tradition
review it is a process under which
executive and legislative actions are
subject to review by the judiciary our
of course to assess federal law
act order is in compliance status not
just the laws it is also the executive
acts executive orders even they are
under judicial review so the answer will
be a next question which of the
following are not necessarily the
consequences of proclamation of
presidents who will in a state first
dissolution of the student legislature
assembly this is wrong straighten
legislature assembly is not dissolved it
is just suspended it is kept in a
suspended state second is removal of
Council of Ministers in a state yes cm
and Council of Ministers do not have any
power all the decisions are take
by the governor in the name of the
president so all the practical power
goes to the governor in the state during
state emergency Article 356 then
dissolution of the local body is no
nothing happens to the local body they
are there to stay so the answer is B one
entry this question if you remember the
arunachal pradesh example for last year
throughout 2016 it was in news so if you
can remember the arunachal pradesh
example you can solve this question very
easily remember two times the government
was dissolved and half a soul of
Ministers was was dissolved then again
new roman' was found after something and
then again everyone to pose a new Chief
Minister response so this half death
happened twice but did the Legislative
Assembly did it go away no the MLAs were
all the same they just switched parties
and the government new government was
made that's it and governor administers
the state in the name of the prince and
so answer is B 1 and 3 so remember
practical examples always well it's
reading polity if you can correlate with
the current news it will be easier to
remember it will be easier to solve and
things which are in news topics which
are in use only they are asked but they
will not not be asked directly they will
be linked to the static portion like in
this question and they will be asked in
that manner so we'll move on to the next
question now which of the following are
and massaged by the right against
exploitation in the Constitution of
India prohibition of toxic in human
beings and forced labour yes this is
article 23 under right against
exploitation abolition of untouchability
article 17 no this is another right to
equality protection of interests of the
minorities this is also wrong this is
under under the educational and Cultural
Rights
finally prohibition of employment for
children in factories mind this is
correct article number 24 this is also
fight against exploitation so our answer
is one and for simple question from
fundamental right all you need to
remember is the not the rights which are
under grouped under which heading so the
basic groupings at least study clearly
shades right against exploitation or
twenty three twenty four by two
equalities from fourteen to eighteen and
ultra l'éducation rights are 29 and 30
out of the following statements choose
the one that brings out the principle
underlying the cabinet for
of government first option arrangement
for minimizing the criticism against
government this is wrong they do not
have the cabinet form of government so
that kritis government criticism is less
second mechanism for speeding up the
activities of government no this is also
wrong third answer is mechanism of
parliamentary democracy for ensuring
collective responsibility of the
government to the people this is right
the cabinet form of government is so
that the executive is responsible to the
Parliament so there is collective
responsibility of the government the
executive to the Parliament and it is a
device for strengthening the hands of
the head of government no this is wrong
so our answer is see which one of the
following is not a feature of Indian
federalism first there is an independent
judiciary in India yes this is a feature
ours have been clearly divided between
the center and the states yes we have
the power sphere divided there is a
Union list state list and one current
list on which laws can be framed
federating units have been given unequal
representation in the Rajya Sabha this
is also right see you stabilization has
more seats in rather Sabha than other
states like system or smaller other
states like West Bengal because the
maximum population is of the third
relation so that is unequal
representation according to the
population it is the result of an
agreement among the federating units
this is absolutely wrong so our answer
is D was there any agreement when India
got independence did it did any
agreement happen between the various
states like United Provinces Madras
Presidency Bombay presidency no there
was nothing that sort of that sort
yes saga well not my patil brought in
all the princely states into the Indian
Union they had agreements with both
princely states but not among the other
federating units so this was not like
USA USA all the 13 colonies when they
got independence they fought together if
they had an agreement that we will be
governed as the United States of America
so they had an agreement in India there
is no such agreement with all the
following statements are true of the
fundamental duties of an Indian citizen
first a legislative process has been
provided enforce these do you know there
is no legislative
it is wrong the statement number one is
wrong they are correlated to legal
duties this is also wrong our answer is
neither one nor to see there is no
legislative process to enforce
fundamental duties they are not legally
binding but some laws have been made
they have been passed like the
Prevention of inserts to the National
Honor Act 1979 so this automatically
takes care of the fundamental duty that
says that you have to honor the national
symbols the national flag etcetera so
that fundamental duty and be enforced
using this law when there is no process
that has been given in the Constitution
that frames so-and-so laws there are
some laws that have been framed by the
successive governments for example
another example can be that now it is
the fundamental duty of a parent to send
his or her child to a school because
education is now fundamental right but
that is not prescribed by the
Constitution that how you have to make
these laws there is no legislative
process to enforce these duties
different laws are there which can
enforce these duties so the second
statement in Eagle Duty see you have
legal duties like paying taxes if you
are earning ten lakh or 20 lakh rupees
per year you are supposed to pay that
income tax because you come in the
income tax bracket this income tax slab
now if you are not paying income tax
that is a legal duty that is not being
performed but it has got nothing to do
with the fundamental duties they are
different they are not poor relative ok
nigga duties and fundamental duties are
not correlative in India which of the
following objectives is not embodied in
the preamble to the Constitution
so PML is very important every word of
that pml-n be asked as a question a
question can be framed so which of these
is mentioned Liberty of thought economic
Liberty Liberty of expression and
Liberty of belief let us just see the
humble itself this is the preamble read
it he says limit your expression in
belief so three options are already out
expression and belief our answers will
be economic Liberty now it is talking
about economic justice injustice social
economic and political there is a
difference between economic justice and
liberty the government
we'll ensure economic justice so that
everyone gets fair and equal treatment
and they get a fair and equitable share
of the country's resources but there is
no economic Liberty in this country if
tomorrow you decide to open a medical
shop in your house and start selling
medicines just because you know about
them you are not allowed to do that
there is no Liberty in that respect you
need a license you need to be trained as
a pharmacist to sell medicines
you cannot just simply start prescribing
medicines to people become a doctor you
have to complete an education degree you
have to have a license from the Medical
Council of India so there are
restrictions on economic economic
Liberty you cannot do whatever you want
you cannot start selling anything here
that you want you cannot trade in any
activities that you want to do so there
is no full economic Liberty in the
country there are some restrictions so
our answer here is economic Liberty
being the preamble very carefully every
word equation can be framed I am telling
you again this is again an analytical
question democracy's superior virtue
lies in the fact that it calls into
activity so the question is time to ask
which of the following activities brings
out the best of Indian democracy or any
democracy first option says the
intelligence and character of ordinary
men and women yes it is the character of
an ordinary voter that will decide what
kind of a person is representing him and
his constituency or her constituency in
the Parliament so the intelligence and
character of ordinary men and women is a
good virtue if the people themselves do
not have good character they will vote
for someone who does not have good
character but on the other hand if the
people themselves have good intelligence
they have good character they will vote
like-minded people to the Parliament so
this is our answer but let us look at
the other options as well the methods
for strengthening executive leadership
no there is no strengthening of
executive leadership due to this
superior individuals with dynamism and
vision yes this is also a virtue of
democracy it will bring out the best of
the leaders in a society you can see
that some of the politicians that we
have they have a they have a good vision
they have dynamism they can leave the
country and they have come out from the
society because of the democracy
processes but the more correct answer
here will be this one because this is
more important this is the best virtue
this is the superior virtue finally a
band of dedicated party workers no we
don't want a band of dedicated party
workers that is not the best virtue of
democracy the next question asks what is
the main advantage of parliamentary form
of government the executive and
legislature work independently no this
is not the main advantage it provides
continuity of policy and is more
efficient no if such was the case won't
the presidential form of government that
is in u.s. is that should not be
efficient at all but it is not a theory
they are efficient presidential form of
governments are also efficient the
executive remains responsible to the
legislature yes this is the answer
egative remains responsible this is the
main advantage of parliamentary form of
government when the government is formed
out of the Parliament itself the head of
the government cannot be changed without
election no this is wrong it can be
changed is the ruling party tomorrow
decides to change its leader the head of
the government can be changed our answer
is C in the context of in the of which
one of the following is the current
relationship between rights and duties
rights are correlated with duties this
is the answer but let's you have a look
at the other options as well
rights are personal and hence
independent of society no this is wrong
rights are not independent of the
society and duties you're right
and be infringing someone else's rights
so they are not completely independent
they don't exist in a vacuum it is all
you relative to the other person's
rights rights not duties are important
for the advancement of personality
opposite is and no both are important
one cannot be one cannot advance without
just without the other one duty is not
rights are important for the stability
of the state no both are important so
this is also wrong rights are always put
into it duties you might have read the
sentence in your school textbooks they
are two sides of the same point that is
completely true
and remember rights and never be
independent they are not independent of
the society you're right and infringe
upon other person's right
so they have to be a date there are
reasonable restrictions on everything in
India
remember morality public order health
these are some of the reasonable
restrictions that have been put upon
many of the fundamental rights the mind
of the makers of the Constitution is
reflected in which of the following see
everything does reflect some or the
other mind of the Constitution makers
you cannot make fundamental rights CPSP
or fundamental duties or preamble
anything without using your mind but we
have to see this question in a specific
context the reason this was asked is
that many of these famous judgments have
said that sabrine put has said that the
m/l is a key to open the minds of the
makers like in correctness versus state
of Punjab the statement was given by so
being good and in many other cases the
preamble gives a broad picture though it
gives a broad context of the entire
Constitution so that is why it gives the
idea to the mind of the makers so the
answer is preamble because fundamental
rights duties tbsps they are there but
they are a small part of the
Constitution they do not reflect the
character of the nature of the entire
Constitution here in preamble in just a
few sentences they tell us about
everything that Indian Constitution will
stand up for that is why the mind of the
makers is reflected in the ample and
many-a-times Supreme Court judges have
said said this in their decisions that
preamble is a key to open the minds of
the makers next question Parliament of
India exercises control over the
functions of the Council of Ministers
through adjournment motion yes push an
hour yes and supplementary questions yes
this question our answer will be 1 2 & 3
discretion is directly come from - makan
in the parliamentary system of
government it says this is a line
directly from polish wagon that afforded
the Parliament exercises control over
the ministers to various devices like
push on our discussions adjournment
motion no confidence motion it should
talk in German motions initially it was
intended we introduced only for matters
of urgent public importance and the
normal business of the house was
interrupt
whenever an adjournment motion was
brought but nowadays it has been seen
that it is it is brought in quite
frequently adjournment motion is brought
quite frequently anything that is
happening in the country brings an
adjournment motion in the parliament so
this is to censure the government okay
so remember the answer will be 1 2 or 3
all of these three are instruments of
the Parliament to regulate the Council
of Ministers to exercise control with
reference to the Parliament of India
consider the following statements a
private member's bill is a bill
presented by a member of parliament who
is not elected but will be nominated by
the president is it - no a private
member is any member who is not a
minister so everyone heard from whoever
is a minister they are all private
members so just ministers are not
private members even if someone is from
the ruling party he is also a private
member recently a private member's bill
has been passed in the Parliament for
the first time in history wrong there
have been 14 bills that have been passed
so our answer is D neither one nor two
private remember anyone who is not a
minister envied from the ruling party
till 814 private member's bills have
been passed the last one was in 1970 so
it has been a long time since one must
ask transgendered persons prediction of
rights bill was brought in Lok Sabha in
2016 this is the 15th private member's
bill it has been passed in the Rajas
tougher but it is still pending in the
Lok Sabha so that that is why this was
in news last year and in 2017 as well
that is why this question was asked one
of the implications of equality in
society is the absence of
once there is privileges see there will
there will be no privileges there will
be no special treatment to anyone once
the HD quality
so after India became independent the
Constitution was applied this right to
equality so if someone was a Mirada or
Nawab before he or she will be taken
similar to a normal person if they both
commit a crime
there will be same punishment for an ex
maharaja and a normal person so there
will be no special privileges earlier it
was not the case
will there be restraint yes there will
always be restraint in
equal society as well see modern
democracies are all equal societies they
strive for equality does not mean that
they let anyone do whatever they want
there will always be some reasonable
restrictions some restraint competition
yes there will be competition
many companies compete with each other
for more business more growth ideology
yes there will be ideology in a society
equality does not mean that ideology is
wiped out unser s privileges this
question has come from ITL 14 article 14
talks about equality before law that
that was a British origin concept and
then there is an American concept that
says equal protection of the law the
absence of any special privileges this
is the British concept equality before
law it prevents favors to any person so
this is where this question comes from
article 14 right to equality this
principle among the following was added
to the directive principles of state
policy by the 22nd amendment the mini
Constitution which was brought by the
Ghandi in 1976 during emergency so equal
pay for equal work for both men and
women this was their earlier
participation of workers in the
management of the industries yes this
was brought by 42nd Amendment right to
work education and public assistance was
there previously this was also them
previously these are already PSPs
article 43 cases the participation of
workers in the management of industries
39 says equal pay for equal work that
was there in the original Constitution
41 was also their right to work
education and public assistance and
article 43 living wage for workers
promotion of cottage industries this one
of the following statements is erected
rights are claims of the states against
the citizen no they are not the right
claims of the state rights are
privileges which are incorporated in the
constitution of a state no they are not
privileges rights are claims of the
citizens against the state yes this is
correct
remember fundamental rights those are
the rights that you can go to the courts
if this government is not giving those
rights to you the society is not giving
those fundamental rights to you you can
go again to society against state to a
court of law
so rights are claims of citizens against
the state and not vice-versa rights are
privileges of only if you know
this is not the case we have a quality
right to equality everyone has equal
rights so answer is see you can see that
these are all analytical questions based
on DSP fundamental right so this is the
basic part of Constitution you all must
have studied these but you have to use
some app you have to apply your
knowledge you have to use your knowledge
in such a manner that you can arrive at
the conclusion in these answers local
self-government can be best explained as
an exercise in democratic
decentralization not much to discuss
here democratic decentralization was the
purpose of local self-government the
73rd and 74th amendment was brought and
which gave the powers for the local
bodies mentalities urban local bodies
and panchayat in India this is the
definition democratic decentralization
covers a system of governance with
citizens of any locality possess the
right to hold local public officials
accountable through various democratic
means next question consider following
statements with reference to the
Constitution of India the negative
principles of state policy constitute
limitations upon legislative function no
executive function no our answer is
neither one nor two type the principles
of state policy do not impose any
limitations on legislature as well as
executive there is no limitation they
are just direct is their directions that
ideally this should be the case so our
answer is neither one nor with this we
come to an end of quality discussion I
will not discuss the international
relations question first one is
broad-based create an investment
agreement vdi a passive in news is seen
within the negotiations held between
India and European Union it is between
EU and India not GCC or OECD and
Shanghai Cooperation Organization see if
this has been in news since 2007 because
we have been trying to get a agreement
with the EU since 2007 last year when
pradhan mantri Modi visited Brazil in
March 2016 again this was in news
because the talks were going on at that
time so this was all over the news BT IA
this European Union instead of the
following statements India has ratified
that trade facilitation agreement
ESO
of WTO efo was signed in December 2013
yes India has ratified it it has done in
2016 April it was ratified CFA is a part
of WTO's Bali ministerial package of
2013 yes this is also correct
EFA came into force in January 2016 this
is wrong he have take came into force in
this year February 2017 and that is the
reason that this question has been asked
there was no gain this was rotten news
three years ago this was huge this was a
huge deal this t fa at WTO so now our
answer here is 1 & 2 only remember India
ratified TFA in 2016 sometime around
April and he has entered into force in
2017 security spent 2/3 and these who
have signed it they have ratified it now
so that is why it had entered into force
now after almost after three and a half
years of being signed this is the last
question of ayah and probably the
easiest what is the importance of
developing Chava our would you must have
read it many a times and many places
about Java are simple answer India will
not depend on Pakistan for access to
Afghanistan and Central Asia
we have direct sea route to Africa we
have a direct sea route to all producing
Arab countries and Pakistan will not
facilitate any gas pipeline between Iraq
and India that was another pipeline that
is between AAPI pipeline that has not
got nothing to do with Iraq this is
Chava are here we have direct access of
Manas on and Central Asia so that we can
have huge hydrocarbon resources directly
shipped to Mumbai here with this I come
to an end of the discussion of questions
now last one minute for some gun on my
behalf if you have done well most of
your answers are correct you are
squaring anything about 100k if you're
scoring about 100 start preparing for
means do not waste your time that up
ahead is difficult even if you have got
131 for each it does not mean that you
will be you have a cakewalk it means it
will be very difficult to start
repairing right now just after break of
two or three days if you haven't
performed well learn your lessons from
this year's paper there have you made
mistakes which topics are B and gear up
for next year too
eating because 3rd June of 2018 is not
far away there are hardly there are did
348 days left for next year's freedoms
with this I come to an end of the
lecture thank you very much for watching
have a good day