All Exams  >   CLAT  >   4 Months Preparation Course for CLAT UG  >   All Questions

All questions of Passage Based for Practice for CLAT Exam

Three of the following four are alike in a certain way and so form a group. Which is the one that does not belong to that group?
Q. 6,5,24,25,144,(?)
  • a)
    155   
  • b)
    160
  • c)
    170                     
  • d)
    175
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Zeenat Singh answered
Grouping:

- 6, 24, 144: These are all perfect squares.
- 5, 25: These are both perfect squares of prime numbers.
- 175: This doesn't fit into any of the above categories.

Therefore, the answer is option D, 175.

Select the statement which logically follows the two given statements.
Q.
Statements:
I. No athletes are vegetarians.
II. All players are athletes.
III. Therefore ……….
  • a)
    No players are vegetarians
  • b)
    All players are vegetarian
  • c)
    Some players are vegetarian
  • d)
    All vegetarians are players
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Shubhra Desai answered
Given Statements:
I. No athletes are vegetarians.
II. All players are athletes.

Logical Analysis:
Let's analyze the given statements to determine the logical conclusion.

Statement I: No athletes are vegetarians.
This means that there is no overlap between the set of athletes and the set of vegetarians. In other words, all athletes are non-vegetarians.

Statement II: All players are athletes.
This statement indicates that the set of players is a subset of the set of athletes. Therefore, all players are athletes.

Logical Conclusion:
Combining the information from the given statements, we can conclude that:

Since all players are athletes (Statement II) and no athletes are vegetarians (Statement I), it logically follows that no players can be vegetarians. This is because if there is no overlap between the set of athletes and vegetarians, and all players are athletes, then it can be inferred that no players are vegetarians.

Therefore, the correct logical conclusion is:

Option A: No players are vegetarians.

Directions: In the following questions tests your ability to derive conclusions from complex situations. Read each question carefully and answer the questions that follow.
A pill that can induce abortions in pregnant women has become available in France. The drug, RU486, has proved more than 95% effective in tests conducted by a scientific team in Paris. The drug is an anti-hormone which disrupts pregnancy by blocking the implantation of a fertilized egg in the wall of the uterus. In France, the pill will be available to women who are 49 days late in their menstrual cycle. The company that manufactures the pill, Roussel Uclaf, states, however, that the pill is not a “morning after” pill for use as a contraceptive.
Which of the following statements can be correctly deduced from the text above?
  • a)
    The drug RU486 is a new type of contraceptive.
  • b)
    The drug RU486 blocks egg production.
  • c)
    The drug RU486 can be used to terminate pregnancy.
  • d)
    The drug RU486 will replace conventional abortion techniques.
  • e)
    The drug RU486 will only be available in France.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Aryan Khanna answered
Statement (A) cannot be deduced from the text. It is an untrue statement: a contraceptive is something that can prevent conception and the drug discussed here does not prevent conception. Therefore, (A) is an incorrect choice. Statement (B) is also an untrue statement. The drug is reported to block egg implantation, not egg production. There is nothing in the paragraph concerning the drug’s effectiveness, side-effects, benefits, or dangers as compared to other abortion techniques, so there is no basis on which the reader can deduce or infer that the new drug will replace conventional abortion techniques. So, (D) is not appropriate.
Although the drug has been manufactured and tested in France, there is no indication that its use will be limited to that country alone, so statement (E) is not valid. The statement in (C) is the only limited statement that can be deduced from the text - that the drug RU486 can be used to induce abortion, thus terminating pregnancy.

In a certain language, “I like you” is written as 123; “you love me and her” is written as 34567; and “They are crazy” is written as 890. How will you write “You, they and I are crazy and love her”?
  • a)
    386196047             
  • b)
    38160964
  • c)
    381690647             
  • d)
    386190647
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Faizan Khan answered
I like you                              
  1   2   3
You love me and her    3   4   5  6  7
They are crazy       8   9   0
 
You they and I are Crazy and love her
3     8     6    1   9   0      6      4    7

Weaver sees hypocrisy in the World Bank as a predictable feature in a large international organization especially when viewed using resource dependency (viewing the competitive environment) and sociological institutionalism (the authorising environment). The Bank's emphasis on organizational survival and legitimacy shows itself in its interactions with multiple actors in its competitive and authoritarian environments. Many critics of the Bank simply see the Bank as unable to achieve the goals it sets and help its client states. Weaver however launches into an in-depth description of two "worlds"-the World's Bank and the Bank's World. The former indicates the complex structure of the Bank including its donor states, client states, its private capita markets and the watchdog Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs). Weaver's examination reveals the various pressures exerted on the Bank and the degree of American influence on the bank.
In as much as the Bank is pressured from many sides, Weaver notes a strong degree of operational authority and autonomy in the "Bank's World". This stems from the complexity of its operations, some which are not open to extensive review. Second the diversity of member states allows the Bank some autonomy and most importantly, the Bank holds a strong monopoly over development related knowledge. This control of ideas is coupled with a technocratic and economic rationality, reinforced with the influx of Western trained neo-classical economists. Bank ideological coherence is also maintained by the editing of reports to align with neoliberal beliefs. It is within these strong intellectual norms that Weaver examines World Bank reforms. Contrary to some critics, the Bank did engage in reforms in the 1990s. The Strategic Compact arose as a need to transform the Bank back as an effort to re-orientate itself as the premier development agency, after external criticism and an internal evaluation. The first aim of streamlining bureaucracy was easily reached however the aim of being more "poverty focused and accountable" came at odds with the technical, economic and apolitical rationality. New efforts such as listening to clients and conducting consultations clashed with the existing approval culture. Overall, changes occurred but still the approval culture remained strong.
Similarly, the focus on good governance was not that effective with apolitical stances amongst staff. Furthermore, the dominating neo-liberal mindset resulted in governance issues framed with economic objectives in mind. Just as with the Strategic Compact, Weaver notes that governance reform challenged the Bank's conventional method of conducting business. Weaver does qualify that the constant need to placate the demands of various external groups also hampered Bank reform. She however noted that the Bank deep culture will prevent any productive change. Weaver thus delves away from the normal criticism of the World Bank to explain the reasons of Bank actions and activities. She shed a new light noting that such hypocrisy is a tenet in any large international organisation. In order for any improvement to the World Bank, it is not simply the initiation of change but the need to re work the internal settings of one of the world's most important development groups.
It can be inferred that Weaver's attitude to the World Bank is best reflected in which of the following statements?
  • a)
    The World Bank is a hypocritical organization and needs to reform itself to bring in change.
  • b)
    Hypocrisy in the World Bank is conventional for such an organization and the Bank has to bring in internal reforms to be effective.
  • c)
    The World Bank is hypocritical because it is unable to achieve the goals it sets and help its client states.
  • d)
    Hypocrisy in the World Bank was reflected when being more "poverty focused and accountable" came at odds with the technical, economic and apolitical rationality.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Aryan Khanna answered
The question asks for the statement which most reflects Weaver's attitude. In the first and last paragraphs of the passage, Weaver agrees that the World Bank is a hypocritical organization she also moves away from this to look at how it can move away from this. Option (a) does not answer this question entirely and instead criticizes the bank.
Option (b) is the best answer in the context of the entire passage. Option (c) has never been stated nor implied by Weaver, it is what other critics have said about the Bank. Option (d) has to do with the failed reforms of the 1990s and not the time period the author is writing in.

Directions: In the following questions tests your ability to derive conclusions from complex situations. Read each question carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Average family income is right where it was 20 years ago, even though, in most families these days, husbands and wives are working.
The above statement implies all of the following EXCEPT:
  • a)
    Even though nominal family income may have increased, inflation has risen at an equal rate.
  • b)
    More husbands and wives are working today than 20 years ago.
  • c)
    It was more prevalent for one spouse to work 20 years ago than today.
  • d)
    The price level was lower 20 years ago.
  • e)
    Wives earn more than husbands today.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Aryan Khanna answered
Alternative (D) cannot be implied from the statement. There is no information in the statement that implies that wives earn more than husbands. Alternative (A) may be implied because as wives contributed to the household nominal income, if prices increased at the same rate as the income, real income would stay the same. Alternatives (B) and (C) are implicit in the statement.
If the added income contribution of wives leaves average family income at the level it was 20 years ago, then the reason must be that the price level was lower 20 years ago. So, (E) is implied.
 
 

Directions: In the following questions tests your ability to derive conclusions from complex situations. Read each question carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Sally overslept. Therefore, she did not eat breakfast. She realized that she was late for school, so she ran as fast as she could and did not see a hole in the ground which was in her path. She tripped and broke her ankle. She was then taken to the hospital and while lying in bed was visited by her friend, who wanted to know why she had got up so late.
Which of the following conclusions can be made from the above passage?
  • a)
    Because Sally did not eat her breakfast, she broke her ankle.
  • b)
    Sally’s friend visited her in the hospital because she wanted to know why she was late for school.
  • c)
    Sally did not notice the hole because she overslept.
  • d)
    Sally broke her ankle because she went to bed late the previous night.
  • e)
    Sally’s broken ankle meant she did not go to school that day.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Anaya Patel answered
Here, we have a chain of events when the conclusion of one argument becomes the premise for another. Only (C) can be concluded from the facts given in the passage - that is, because Sally overslept, she ran towards school, and because she ran, she did not notice the hole. Choice (A) is inappropriate because the chain of events is not linked by the fact that Sally did not eat her breakfast. The passage does not include a consequence emanating from that fact. Choice (B) is not appropriate because there is no way to link Sally’s friend to the events in the passage.
Similarly, facts not included preclude (D) from being the appropriate answer. Finally, (E) cannot be inferred, as we do not know what Sally did later that day; she may have been released from the hospital and gone to school.

Statement: The captain of the school football team selected only fourteen players to play all the eight matches of the interschool football competition. 
Assumptions: 
I. There may be adequate number of football players for all the matches. 
II. The captain may be able to play in all the matches.
  • a)
    if only assumption II is implicit.
  • b)
    if only assumption I is implicit. 
  • c)
    if either I or II is implicit. 
  • d)
    if neither I nor II is implicit.
  • e)
    if both I and II are implicit.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Karan chawla answered
Assumption I: There may be an adequate number of football players for all the matches.
Assumption II: The captain may be able to play in all the matches.

Explanation:
To determine the correctness of the assumptions, we need to analyze each one separately.

Assumption I: There may be an adequate number of football players for all the matches.
This assumption implies that there are enough players available to fill the remaining positions in the team for each match. Since the captain has already selected fourteen players, it suggests that there might be additional players in the team who can be chosen for the remaining positions. This assumption is implicit because if there were not enough players, it would not be possible to field a complete team for all the matches.

Assumption II: The captain may be able to play in all the matches.
This assumption suggests that the captain himself is a skilled player and can contribute to the team's performance on the field. Since the captain has selected only fourteen players, it implies that he intends to include himself in the team for all the matches. However, this assumption is not explicitly mentioned and may vary depending on the captain's skills, availability, or any other factors.

Conclusion:
Based on the analysis, assumption I is implicit as it is necessary to have an adequate number of players for all the matches. On the other hand, assumption II is not implicit as it depends on the captain's abilities and preferences. Hence, the correct answer is option B - if only assumption I is implicit.

In the wake of the varying forms which the idea of the end of history has taken, the intellectual history of disillusionment and resignation has been countered with a Leftist framework. But, with almost 10 million nonwhite people in the EU, the rising number of impoverished masses in Brazil, or in South Asia, as well as the problems of health and illiteracy, the Left has a formidable task before it; issues concerning economic deprivation, the brutalisation of workers, increasing spending on nuclear enhancement and the need for all ethnic minorities to explicitly feature in a pluralistic vision needs to be the foundation of any reinvention of the Left.
The long drawn out economic and political tensions, for instance, in Latin America have moved the Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro and Evo Morales trio towards an international agenda for social reconstruction within which socialism does not need to be replaced but must be put forward as a programme to salvage a world from inequality and the abuse of power, especially the hegemony of the White House. They have together constructed a progressive alliance, insisting on a collective leadership that endorses the rich diversity of radical and socialist traditions.
In a drastically damaged world in which received political ideologies have been exhausted, anti-imperialist agenda and far-reaching remedies have been initiated in Bolivia, Cuba and Venezuela to check the erratic play of market forces. Chavez has been particularly hard hitting through his move of cutting off oil supplies to the US and his unquestionable allegiance with Castro. He has not hesitated to build trade relations with China and to back Iran's nuclear ambitions. The dream of an anti-imperialist union has finally come true by the induction of Brazil, Bolivia, Argentina, Uruguay, Peru and Chile into the club headed by Castro and Chavez, and underpinned by the age-old vision for a strong Leftist opposition to the interventionist policies of the U.S. Inspired by great heroes like Simon Bolivar and Che Guevara, Chavez has been fighting for regional integration and a society that bases itself on the ideology of the new South American Left.
What do you feel is the political ideology of leaders like Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro and Evo Morales?
  • a)
    Market oriented economic policies are best for the people
  • b)
    Socialism to remove inequality, abuse of power and the hegemony of the US
  • c)
    A pro - US policy
  • d)
    Rural reconstruction
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Sandeep Patel answered
Political Ideology of Chavez, Castro, and Morales
The political ideology of leaders like Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, and Evo Morales is rooted in socialism, with a focus on addressing inequality, combating imperialism, and promoting regional solidarity.
Core Principles of Their Ideology:
- Socialism as a Tool for Equality:
These leaders advocate socialism to dismantle systemic inequalities within their societies. They believe that a socialist framework can empower the marginalized and redistribute wealth more equitably.
- Opposition to Imperialism:
A significant aspect of their ideology is the rejection of U.S. hegemony and interventionist policies. They aim to construct a political landscape that prioritizes sovereignty and self-determination for Latin American nations.
- Collective Leadership and Diversity:
The trio emphasizes the importance of collective leadership that embraces various radical and socialist traditions. They argue for a united front among leftist movements to challenge the status quo.
- Regional Integration:
Inspired by historical figures like Simon Bolivar and Che Guevara, they advocate for regional integration. This vision includes forming alliances that strengthen economic and political ties among South American countries.
- Economic Policies Against Market Forces:
They have initiated policies to counteract the unpredictable nature of market forces, focusing on social welfare, education, and healthcare to uplift impoverished populations.
In summary, the ideology of Chavez, Castro, and Morales is firmly rooted in socialism, aimed at addressing inequality and pushing back against imperialist influences, particularly from the United States. Their focus on regional solidarity and a collective approach further defines their political vision.

Low wages, large numbers of casual and contract workers, authoritarianism in the workplace, unjust victimisation of workers who are at the forefront of resistance, the coming together of company and state to put down worker resistance with a heavy hand and the lack of a fighting spirit on the part of the central trade unions affiliated to the mainstream political parties - these are what the workers are up against, even in the public sector.
One is reminded of the 44-day strike that began in April this year of thousands of contract workers, of the public sector Neyveli Lignite Corporation (NLC), who have been struggling for many years to win wage parity with the company's permanent workers and the regularisation of their jobs. Sadly, the All India Trade Union Congress (AITUC) and the Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) allied with it did not even give a call for the permanent workers to ally with these contract workers. Instead, all the AITUC did was to appeal to Jayalalithaa, the chief minister of Tamil Nadu, in which the NLC is located, to intervene on behalf of the workers and prevail upon the central government to help settle the strike in their favour. This, when the Tamil Nadu police had been ordered to arrest the striking workers after their strike had been declared "illegal" through a court order.
The political parties, to which the AITUC and the CITU are affiliated, had entered into a thoroughly opportunistic alliance with Jayalalithaa's AIADMK in the state assembly elections last year and wanted to keep the alliance going. Indeed, it was the AIADMK government along with the central government, which controls the NLC that was instrumental in the defeat of the strike when the AITUC decided to call it off after some vague promises of regularisation were made, without, of course, any agreement on pay parity. If this then is the plight of workers in leading enterprises in the private and public sector, Maruti Suzuki and NLC, one can only imagine what their predicament is in labour-intensive manufacturing like apparel and footwear, and in the sweatshops of diamond cutting and polishing, all industries where the growth of exports is faltering.
Which of the following options has not been mentioned as some of the challenges that workers face?
  • a)
    Discrimination against some workers.
  • b)
    Low support received from trade unions.
  • c)
    The consistent victimisation of employees.
  • d)
    The states' cooperation in quashing worker resistance.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Dharini das answered
Discrimination against some workers:
- The passage mentions the struggle of contract workers at the Neyveli Lignite Corporation to achieve wage parity with permanent workers, highlighting discrimination based on employment status.

Low support received from trade unions:
- The All India Trade Union Congress (AITUC) and the Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) are criticized for not providing adequate support to the contract workers during their strike, showcasing the lack of effective assistance from mainstream trade unions.

The states cooperation in quashing worker resistance:
- The passage discusses how the state, in this case, Tamil Nadu, cooperated with the central government and the company to suppress the strike by ordering the arrest of workers and declaring the strike illegal, illustrating the challenges faced by workers when the state aligns with corporations against them.

Unjust victimisation of employees:
- The passage also mentions the unjust victimization of workers who resist against unfair labor practices, such as the striking contract workers at NLC who faced legal action and arrests for their actions, demonstrating the risks and consequences of standing up for workers' rights.
Therefore, the option "Low support received from trade unions" has not been explicitly mentioned as one of the challenges that workers face, as the passage does highlight the lack of effective support from mainstream trade unions but does not specifically mention it as a challenge in itself.

Beauty is a valuable commodity in our image-obsessed society, so it's not surprising that Miss Indias and Miss Worlds make headlines. These young women aren't just beautiful; they're most often thin too. But Chloe Marshall, the 2008 Miss England runner-up, was size 16 ("full- figured" or "ample," to put it politely) and therefore made even more news. A full-figured beauty pageant finalist creating a stop-the-press moment highlights the fact that larger women are not usually considered "the fairest of them all." Indeed, pick up a magazine or newspaper on any other day and the message is loud and clear -thin is in. With the average woman hovering around a size 14 or above, the comparison is odious. A recent survey revealed only six percent of women aged 18 to 64 were "very satisfied" with their looks. That leaves 94 percent of women critical of their appearance. In other words, the majority of the women sitting with you in the metro this morning woke up feeling judgmental and negative about their looks. "If every woman in the world woke up, slapped herself on the head and said: 'I'm happy with who I am,' entire economies would collapse," says Jane Caro, an award-winning advertising writer.
The media is often portrayed as the bogeyman in the body-image debate, but experts say it's only part of the picture. Paxton notes women are getting messages from family from an early age. The way in which parents view their bodies impacts their children's attitudes. "A mother who is always dieting or being critical of her body is sending a clear message to her daughters," says Tiggemann. "That sense of body dissatisfaction is passed on." The anti-obesity push is also unhelpful. "It's shifted the focus away from health and onto weight and looks," she says. "It's perpetuating the notion that fat is bad, thin is good, and thinner is better." And it's a notion that has recently been proved to be untrue.
Why did Chloe Marshall make headlines?
  • a)
    She was not unlike the others who believed that 'thin is in'.
  • b)
    She was not considered 'fairest of them all'.
  • c)
    She was not as 'image obsessed' as the other winners.
  • d)
    She was a 'full figured' 2008 Miss England runner up.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Akshara shah answered
Why did Chloe Marshall make headlines?

Explanation:
Chloe Marshall made headlines because she was a full-figured 2008 Miss England runner-up. This was significant because beauty pageants typically favor thin participants, so seeing a larger woman achieve success in such a competitive environment was newsworthy.
Here is a breakdown of why Chloe Marshall's achievement stood out:
- Size 16: Chloe Marshall's size 16 figure defied the conventional standards of beauty prevalent in the media and beauty pageant industry.
- Breaking Stereotypes: Her success challenged the notion that only thin women can be considered beautiful or worthy of recognition in beauty pageants.
- Rare Occurrence: It was rare to see a full-figured woman reaching the runner-up position in a prestigious beauty pageant like Miss England, making it a noteworthy event.
- Impact: Chloe Marshall's accomplishment brought attention to the lack of representation of diverse body types in the media and beauty industry, sparking discussions about body positivity and inclusivity.
Overall, Chloe Marshall's story highlighted the need for broader definitions of beauty and the importance of celebrating diversity in body shapes and sizes.

Directions: In the following questions tests your ability to derive conclusions from complex situations. Read each question carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Young people who imagine that the life of the writer is one of glamour, riches or fame soon discover not only the difficulties of the craft but the long odds against achieving any measure of recognition or financial security.
Upon being asked, “Aren’t most editors failed writers?”, T.S. Eliot is said to have remarked, “Yes, but so are most writers.”
The statement by T.S. Eliot conveys which of the following ideas?
  • a)
    The profession of editing can be just as creative and challenging as writing.
  • b)
    Few writers are fortunate enough to attain real success in their profession.
  • c)
    For a writer, success is measured more by influence exerted than by material gain achieved.
  • d)
    Many writers find that a stint at editorial work is a beneficial apprenticeship in their craft.
  • e)
    There are no clear-cut standards of success and failure for writers, but there are such standards for editors.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Jahnvi dubey answered

Explanation:

Interpreting T.S. Eliot's Statement:
T.S. Eliot's statement, "Yes, but so are most writers," suggests that not only editors but also writers face challenges and struggles in their respective professions.

Implication of the Statement:
The statement implies that achieving success as a writer is difficult and that the majority of writers do not attain significant recognition or financial stability.

Key Idea Conveyed:
The key idea conveyed by T.S. Eliot's statement is that few writers are fortunate enough to achieve real success in their profession. This highlights the challenges and uncertainties faced by individuals pursuing a career in writing.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, T.S. Eliot's remark underscores the harsh realities of the writing profession, emphasizing the uphill battle that writers often face in their quest for recognition and financial security.

Six houses – A, B, C, D, E, F are constructed on a small flat area, the focal point of which is a temple.
House A is directly north of the Temple.
House C is directly west of the Temple.
House D is South of House C.
House E is West of House A.
The temple is directly Southeast of House B and directly northwest of House F.
Q.
How many houses must be West of House A?
  • a)
    1                             
  • b)
    3
  • c)
    4                             
  • d)
    None of these
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Understanding the House Layout
To solve the problem, we need to visualize the positions of the houses relative to the Temple. Here's a step-by-step breakdown of the positions:
1. Positioning the Houses
- House A is directly north of the Temple.
- House C is directly west of the Temple.
- House D is south of House C, which places it southwest of the Temple.
- House E is west of House A, meaning it is to the left of House A when facing north.
- The Temple is southeast of House B, indicating that House B is to the northwest of the Temple.
- The Temple is northwest of House F, meaning House F is southeast of the Temple.
2. Visual Representation
If we visualize a simple grid:
A
|
T
C-------D
|
E
- T represents the Temple.
- A is directly north of T.
- C is directly west of T.
- D is south of C.
- E is west of A.
- B is placed northwest of T, and F is southeast of T.
3. Counting Houses West of House A
From the layout:
- House E is the only house located west of House A.
Thus, the answer to the question of how many houses must be west of House A is:
Correct Answer: Option 'A' (1 house)

Select the statement which logically follows the two given statements.
Q.
Statements:
I. All persons who have done any creative work can be responsible critics
II. Z has not done any creative work
III. Therefore ………….
  • a)
    Z can be a responsible critic
  • b)
    Z cannot be a responsible critic
  • c)
    Z can become a responsible critic
  • d)
    Z cannot become a responsible critic
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Rhea chauhan answered
Explanation:
All persons who have done any creative work can be responsible critics. This statement implies that in order to be a responsible critic, one must have done some creative work.
Z has not done any creative work. This statement indicates that Z has not fulfilled the requirement of having done creative work in order to be a responsible critic.
Therefore, the logical conclusion would be:

Z cannot be a responsible critic. This follows from the fact that Z does not meet the criteria of having done any creative work, which is necessary to be a responsible critic. Without fulfilling this requirement, Z cannot be considered a responsible critic.

In the wake of the varying forms which the idea of the end of history has taken, the intellectual history of disillusionment and resignation has been countered with a Leftist framework. But, with almost 10 million nonwhite people in the EU, the rising number of impoverished masses in Brazil, or in South Asia, as well as the problems of health and illiteracy, the Left has a formidable task before it; issues concerning economic deprivation, the brutalisation of workers, increasing spending on nuclear enhancement and the need for all ethnic minorities to explicitly feature in a pluralistic vision needs to be the foundation of any reinvention of the Left.
The long drawn out economic and political tensions, for instance, in Latin America have moved the Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro and Evo Morales trio towards an international agenda for social reconstruction within which socialism does not need to be replaced but must be put forward as a programme to salvage a world from inequality and the abuse of power, especially the hegemony of the White House. They have together constructed a progressive alliance, insisting on a collective leadership that endorses the rich diversity of radical and socialist traditions.
In a drastically damaged world in which received political ideologies have been exhausted, anti-imperialist agenda and far-reaching remedies have been initiated in Bolivia, Cuba and Venezuela to check the erratic play of market forces. Chavez has been particularly hard hitting through his move of cutting off oil supplies to the US and his unquestionable allegiance with Castro. He has not hesitated to build trade relations with China and to back Iran's nuclear ambitions. The dream of an anti-imperialist union has finally come true by the induction of Brazil, Bolivia, Argentina, Uruguay, Peru and Chile into the club headed by Castro and Chavez, and underpinned by the age-old vision for a strong Leftist opposition to the interventionist policies of the U.S. Inspired by great heroes like Simon Bolivar and Che Guevara, Chavez has been fighting for regional integration and a society that bases itself on the ideology of the new South American Left.
Why have remedial measures been taken in Bolivia, Cuba and Venezuela?
  • a)
    To remove US hegemony
  • b)
    To stabilize the market
  • c)
    To check the unpredictable move of the market forces
  • d)
    To open market to the developed countries
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Eshaan Kapoor answered
Refer to the first sentence of the third paragraph. It clearly says that the measures have been taken to check the erratic plays or unpredictable moves of market forces. So, option (c) is the correct answer.

In the wake of the varying forms which the idea of the end of history has taken, the intellectual history of disillusionment and resignation has been countered with a Leftist framework. But, with almost 10 million nonwhite people in the EU, the rising number of impoverished masses in Brazil, or in South Asia, as well as the problems of health and illiteracy, the Left has a formidable task before it; issues concerning economic deprivation, the brutalisation of workers, increasing spending on nuclear enhancement and the need for all ethnic minorities to explicitly feature in a pluralistic vision needs to be the foundation of any reinvention of the Left.
The long drawn out economic and political tensions, for instance, in Latin America have moved the Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro and Evo Morales trio towards an international agenda for social reconstruction within which socialism does not need to be replaced but must be put forward as a programme to salvage a world from inequality and the abuse of power, especially the hegemony of the White House. They have together constructed a progressive alliance, insisting on a collective leadership that endorses the rich diversity of radical and socialist traditions.
In a drastically damaged world in which received political ideologies have been exhausted, anti-imperialist agenda and far-reaching remedies have been initiated in Bolivia, Cuba and Venezuela to check the erratic play of market forces. Chavez has been particularly hard hitting through his move of cutting off oil supplies to the US and his unquestionable allegiance with Castro. He has not hesitated to build trade relations with China and to back Iran's nuclear ambitions. The dream of an anti-imperialist union has finally come true by the induction of Brazil, Bolivia, Argentina, Uruguay, Peru and Chile into the club headed by Castro and Chavez, and underpinned by the age-old vision for a strong Leftist opposition to the interventionist policies of the U.S. Inspired by great heroes like Simon Bolivar and Che Guevara, Chavez has been fighting for regional integration and a society that bases itself on the ideology of the new South American Left.
Hegemony means
  • a)
    a series of unnecessary or complicated tasks or actions
  • b)
    a social philosophy advocating the removal of inequalities among people
  • c)
    support or advocacy of something
  • d)
    influence or control over another country, a group of people, etc.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Eshaan Kapoor answered
'Hegemony' means influence or control over another country, a group of people, etc.

In the wake of the varying forms which the idea of the end of history has taken, the intellectual history of disillusionment and resignation has been countered with a Leftist framework. But, with almost 10 million nonwhite people in the EU, the rising number of impoverished masses in Brazil, or in South Asia, as well as the problems of health and illiteracy, the Left has a formidable task before it; issues concerning economic deprivation, the brutalisation of workers, increasing spending on nuclear enhancement and the need for all ethnic minorities to explicitly feature in a pluralistic vision needs to be the foundation of any reinvention of the Left.
The long drawn out economic and political tensions, for instance, in Latin America have moved the Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro and Evo Morales trio towards an international agenda for social reconstruction within which socialism does not need to be replaced but must be put forward as a programme to salvage a world from inequality and the abuse of power, especially the hegemony of the White House. They have together constructed a progressive alliance, insisting on a collective leadership that endorses the rich diversity of radical and socialist traditions.
In a drastically damaged world in which received political ideologies have been exhausted, anti-imperialist agenda and far-reaching remedies have been initiated in Bolivia, Cuba and Venezuela to check the erratic play of market forces. Chavez has been particularly hard hitting through his move of cutting off oil supplies to the US and his unquestionable allegiance with Castro. He has not hesitated to build trade relations with China and to back Iran's nuclear ambitions. The dream of an anti-imperialist union has finally come true by the induction of Brazil, Bolivia, Argentina, Uruguay, Peru and Chile into the club headed by Castro and Chavez, and underpinned by the age-old vision for a strong Leftist opposition to the interventionist policies of the U.S. Inspired by great heroes like Simon Bolivar and Che Guevara, Chavez has been fighting for regional integration and a society that bases itself on the ideology of the new South American Left.
What issues, according to the passage, should form the basis for the Left to rise and be counted?
  • a)
    End history of disillusionment
  • b)
    Reduce non-white people in the European Union
  • c)
    Economic deprivation, ill-treatment of workers, increase spending on nuclear enhancement and the right place for the ethnic minorities
  • d)
    Improving health of all people
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Dia Mehta answered
Refer to the last sentence of the first paragraph.
"...issues concerning economic deprivation... foundation of any reinvention of the Left." So, option C is the correct answer.

Rohit is seventeenth from the left end of a row of 29 boys and Karan is seventeenth from the right end in the same row. How many boys are there between them in the row?
  • a)
    3                             
  • b)
    5
  • c)
    6                             
  • d)
    Data inadequate
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Understanding the Problem
To determine how many boys are between Rohit and Karan in a row of 29 boys, we need to analyze their positions based on the information provided.
Positions of Rohit and Karan
- Rohit is 17th from the left. This means there are 16 boys to his left.
- Karan is 17th from the right. This indicates there are 16 boys to his right.
Calculating Their Total Positions
Since the total number of boys is 29, we can find Karan's position from the left:
- Karan's position from the left = Total boys - Karan's position from the right + 1
- Karan's position from the left = 29 - 17 + 1 = 13
Now we have the following positions:
- Rohit: Position 17 (from the left)
- Karan: Position 13 (from the left)
Finding Boys Between Rohit and Karan
To find how many boys are between Rohit and Karan, we can subtract their positions:
- Boys between them = Rohit's position - Karan's position - 1
- Boys between them = 17 - 13 - 1 = 3
Conclusion
Therefore, the number of boys between Rohit and Karan is 3. The correct answer is option A.

Three of the following four are alike in a certain way and so form a group. Which is the one that does not belong to that group?
Q.
  • a)
    331654729 
  • b)
    381154729
  • c)
    381654729             
  • d)
    381664729
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Tarun Ghoshal answered
Grouping of Numbers

Three of the given options form a group based on a certain pattern, while the remaining one is different from the others. We need to identify the pattern followed by the group and then select the option that does not fit into that pattern.

Pattern: The group consists of numbers that follow a certain sequence. If the digits in each number are arranged in ascending order, starting from the leftmost digit, then the resulting sequence is the same for all three numbers in the group.

Analysis of Options:

a) 331654729
Digits in ascending order: 133456729
b) 381154729
Digits in ascending order: 113458279
c) 381654729
Digits in ascending order: 123345789
d) 381664729
Digits in ascending order: 123346789

Option (a) and (d) have the same sequence of digits when arranged in ascending order, while option (b) has a different sequence. Therefore, option (b) is the odd one out and does not belong to the group.

Hence, the correct answer is option (c) 381654729.

Weaver sees hypocrisy in the World Bank as a predictable feature in a large international organization especially when viewed using resource dependency (viewing the competitive environment) and sociological institutionalism (the authorising environment). The Bank's emphasis on organizational survival and legitimacy shows itself in its interactions with multiple actors in its competitive and authoritarian environments. Many critics of the Bank simply see the Bank as unable to achieve the goals it sets and help its client states. Weaver however launches into an in-depth description of two "worlds"-the World's Bank and the Bank's World. The former indicates the complex structure of the Bank including its donor states, client states, its private capita markets and the watchdog Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs). Weaver's examination reveals the various pressures exerted on the Bank and the degree of American influence on the bank.
In as much as the Bank is pressured from many sides, Weaver notes a strong degree of operational authority and autonomy in the "Bank's World". This stems from the complexity of its operations, some which are not open to extensive review. Second the diversity of member states allows the Bank some autonomy and most importantly, the Bank holds a strong monopoly over development related knowledge. This control of ideas is coupled with a technocratic and economic rationality, reinforced with the influx of Western trained neo-classical economists. Bank ideological coherence is also maintained by the editing of reports to align with neoliberal beliefs. It is within these strong intellectual norms that Weaver examines World Bank reforms. Contrary to some critics, the Bank did engage in reforms in the 1990s. The Strategic Compact arose as a need to transform the Bank back as an effort to re-orientate itself as the premier development agency, after external criticism and an internal evaluation. The first aim of streamlining bureaucracy was easily reached however the aim of being more "poverty focused and accountable" came at odds with the technical, economic and apolitical rationality. New efforts such as listening to clients and conducting consultations clashed with the existing approval culture. Overall, changes occurred but still the approval culture remained strong.
Similarly, the focus on good governance was not that effective with apolitical stances amongst staff. Furthermore, the dominating neo-liberal mindset resulted in governance issues framed with economic objectives in mind. Just as with the Strategic Compact, Weaver notes that governance reform challenged the Bank's conventional method of conducting business. Weaver does qualify that the constant need to placate the demands of various external groups also hampered Bank reform. She however noted that the Bank deep culture will prevent any productive change. Weaver thus delves away from the normal criticism of the World Bank to explain the reasons of Bank actions and activities. She shed a new light noting that such hypocrisy is a tenet in any large international organisation. In order for any improvement to the World Bank, it is not simply the initiation of change but the need to re work the internal settings of one of the world's most important development groups.
What is the tone of the author?
  • a)
    Incisive
  • b)
    Rambling
  • c)
    Verbose
  • d)
    Inconsequential
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Eshaan Kapoor answered
The author's tone is incisive or analytical.

Directions: In the following questions tests your ability to derive conclusions from complex situations. Read each question carefully and answer the questions that follow.
The owners of a local supermarket have decided to make use of three now-redundant check-out counters. They believe that they will attract those customers who have lately been put off by the long check-out lines during the mid-morning and evening rush hours. The owners have concluded that in order to be successful, the increased revenue from existing and added counters will have to be more than the increase in maintenance costs for the added counters.
The underlying goal of the owners can be summarised thus:
  • a)
    To improve services to all customers
  • b)
    To attract people who have never been to the store
  • c)
    To make use of the redundant counters
  • d)
    To keep maintenance costs on the added counters as low as possible.
  • e)
    To increase monthly profits
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?

Faizan Khan answered
Services will be improved, it is hoped, for a certain segment of customers — those that shop during the rush hours — but not for all customers.
This fact makes choice (A) inappropriate. To attract new customers is not stated in the passage as an objective, so (B) is inappropriate. The utilisation of excess capacity, as in (C), is a useful by-product of the new system, but it is not the main goal. If maintenance costs are kept low it will probably make the achievement of the main goal that much easier, but this is not the major objective; so choice (D) is not appropriate. The principal purpose of the owners is to make more money from the change by increasing income by an amount worth more than the added costs.
Therefore, (E) is the appropriate answer.

Beauty is a valuable commodity in our image-obsessed society, so it's not surprising that Miss Indias and Miss Worlds make headlines. These young women aren't just beautiful; they're most often thin too. But Chloe Marshall, the 2008 Miss England runner-up, was size 16 ("full- figured" or "ample," to put it politely) and therefore made even more news. A full-figured beauty pageant finalist creating a stop-the-press moment highlights the fact that larger women are not usually considered "the fairest of them all." Indeed, pick up a magazine or newspaper on any other day and the message is loud and clear -thin is in. With the average woman hovering around a size 14 or above, the comparison is odious. A recent survey revealed only six percent of women aged 18 to 64 were "very satisfied" with their looks. That leaves 94 percent of women critical of their appearance. In other words, the majority of the women sitting with you in the metro this morning woke up feeling judgmental and negative about their looks. "If every woman in the world woke up, slapped herself on the head and said: 'I'm happy with who I am,' entire economies would collapse," says Jane Caro, an award-winning advertising writer.
The media is often portrayed as the bogeyman in the body-image debate, but experts say it's only part of the picture. Paxton notes women are getting messages from family from an early age. The way in which parents view their bodies impacts their children's attitudes. "A mother who is always dieting or being critical of her body is sending a clear message to her daughters," says Tiggemann. "That sense of body dissatisfaction is passed on." The anti-obesity push is also unhelpful. "It's shifted the focus away from health and onto weight and looks," she says. "It's perpetuating the notion that fat is bad, thin is good, and thinner is better." And it's a notion that has recently been proved to be untrue.
Which of the following is the synonym of the word "odious"?
  • a)
    fair
  • b)
    acceptable
  • c)
    inevitable
  • d)
    disgusting
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Understanding "Odious"
The term "odious" is often used to describe something that is extremely unpleasant or repulsive. In the context of the passage, the word helps to convey a negative comparison between societal beauty standards and the reality of women's body sizes.
Synonyms of "Odious"
Among the options provided, the most fitting synonym for "odious" is:
  • d) disgusting - This captures the essence of something that is distasteful or offensive, which aligns well with the negative connotations of the societal pressure on body image.

Analysis of Other Options
To clarify why the other options do not fit:
  • a) fair - This term suggests something just or equitable, which is contrary to the negative implications of "odious."
  • b) acceptable - This implies something that is satisfactory or tolerable, which again does not resonate with the negativity associated with "odious."
  • c) inevitable - This refers to something certain to happen and does not connect with the emotional weight of "odious."

Conclusion
In summary, "odious" effectively communicates a sense of revulsion toward the unrealistic beauty standards perpetuated by society. The correct synonym, "disgusting," reinforces this notion, highlighting the negative impact of these standards on women's self-image.

Directions: In the following questions tests your ability to derive conclusions from complex situations. Read each question carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Pioneers of the motor-car industry realised that if they were going to meet the growing demand for their product, they had to adapt the labour force used in the productive process. Instead of many men working to complete all the stages of one car at a time, they assigned defined tasks to each man which they would repeat on every car.
Which of the following can be concluded from the passage?
  • a)
    Early motor-car manufacturers intended to increase productivity by applying the principle of division of labour.
  • b)
    The car workers became disgruntled because they were assigned monotonous, repetitive tasks on the assembly line.
  • c)
    Economies of scale enabled early motor companies to expand.
  • d)
    A bad worker would perform the same task badly on each car leading to many more rejects.
  • e)
    The new production process enabled certain car workers to become specialists in the part of the process to which they were assigned.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Conclusion from the Passage
The passage discusses the adaptation of the labor force in the early motor-car industry to meet growing demand. The key change was the implementation of the division of labor, which is evidenced by the following points:
Increased Productivity
- The pioneers of the motor-car industry recognized the need to boost productivity to satisfy market demands.
- By assigning defined tasks to each worker, they aimed to streamline the production process.
Division of Labor
- The concept of division of labor involves breaking down the production process into smaller, repetitive tasks assigned to individual workers.
- This method, as implied in the passage, was intended to enhance efficiency and speed in car manufacturing.
Analysis of Other Options
- Option b suggests that workers became disgruntled, but this is not supported by the passage.
- Option c mentions economies of scale, which is not directly discussed.
- Option d highlights the risk of bad workers, but again, this is not a focus of the passage.
- Option e points out specialization, which is a consequence of division of labor but is not the primary conclusion drawn from the text.
Final Conclusion
- Therefore, the most logical conclusion from the passage is option a: "Early motor-car manufacturers intended to increase productivity by applying the principle of division of labour." This directly aligns with the passage's focus on adapting the labor force for efficiency in production.

Beauty is a valuable commodity in our image-obsessed society, so it's not surprising that Miss Indias and Miss Worlds make headlines. These young women aren't just beautiful; they're most often thin too. But Chloe Marshall, the 2008 Miss England runner-up, was size 16 ("full- figured" or "ample," to put it politely) and therefore made even more news. A full-figured beauty pageant finalist creating a stop-the-press moment highlights the fact that larger women are not usually considered "the fairest of them all." Indeed, pick up a magazine or newspaper on any other day and the message is loud and clear -thin is in. With the average woman hovering around a size 14 or above, the comparison is odious. A recent survey revealed only six percent of women aged 18 to 64 were "very satisfied" with their looks. That leaves 94 percent of women critical of their appearance. In other words, the majority of the women sitting with you in the metro this morning woke up feeling judgmental and negative about their looks. "If every woman in the world woke up, slapped herself on the head and said: 'I'm happy with who I am,' entire economies would collapse," says Jane Caro, an award-winning advertising writer.
The media is often portrayed as the bogeyman in the body-image debate, but experts say it's only part of the picture. Paxton notes women are getting messages from family from an early age. The way in which parents view their bodies impacts their children's attitudes. "A mother who is always dieting or being critical of her body is sending a clear message to her daughters," says Tiggemann. "That sense of body dissatisfaction is passed on." The anti-obesity push is also unhelpful. "It's shifted the focus away from health and onto weight and looks," she says. "It's perpetuating the notion that fat is bad, thin is good, and thinner is better." And it's a notion that has recently been proved to be untrue.
Which of the following is the author most likely to agree with?
A. Beauty is given great importance in today's society.
B. Only a few women are happy the way they look.
C. Media is considered the Lilliputian character that is responsible for the body-image debate.
  • a)
    A and B
  • b)
    A and C
  • c)
    B and C
  • d)
    All follow
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Uday Yadav answered
Beauty as a Valuable Commodity:
- The author is likely to agree that beauty holds significant importance in today's society.
- This is evident from the fact that beauty pageants, modeling industry, and media often prioritize thinness and conventional beauty standards.

Body Image Dissatisfaction:
- The author acknowledges that a large majority of women are not satisfied with their looks.
- Various factors such as societal pressures, media influence, and family attitudes contribute to this dissatisfaction.

Media's Role in Body Image Debate:
- While the media is often blamed for promoting unrealistic beauty standards, the author suggests that it is only a part of the problem.
- Family attitudes, parental influence, and societal norms also play a significant role in shaping individuals' body image perceptions.

Shift in Focus from Health to Weight:
- The author agrees that the current anti-obesity push has shifted the focus from health to weight and appearance.
- This shift perpetuates the notion that thinness is ideal and promotes body dissatisfaction among individuals.
Therefore, based on the information provided in the passage, the author is most likely to agree with the statement that "Beauty is given great importance in today's society" (Option A).

Weaver sees hypocrisy in the World Bank as a predictable feature in a large international organization especially when viewed using resource dependency (viewing the competitive environment) and sociological institutionalism (the authorising environment). The Bank's emphasis on organizational survival and legitimacy shows itself in its interactions with multiple actors in its competitive and authoritarian environments. Many critics of the Bank simply see the Bank as unable to achieve the goals it sets and help its client states. Weaver however launches into an in-depth description of two "worlds"-the World's Bank and the Bank's World. The former indicates the complex structure of the Bank including its donor states, client states, its private capita markets and the watchdog Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs). Weaver's examination reveals the various pressures exerted on the Bank and the degree of American influence on the bank.
In as much as the Bank is pressured from many sides, Weaver notes a strong degree of operational authority and autonomy in the "Bank's World". This stems from the complexity of its operations, some which are not open to extensive review. Second the diversity of member states allows the Bank some autonomy and most importantly, the Bank holds a strong monopoly over development related knowledge. This control of ideas is coupled with a technocratic and economic rationality, reinforced with the influx of Western trained neo-classical economists. Bank ideological coherence is also maintained by the editing of reports to align with neoliberal beliefs. It is within these strong intellectual norms that Weaver examines World Bank reforms. Contrary to some critics, the Bank did engage in reforms in the 1990s. The Strategic Compact arose as a need to transform the Bank back as an effort to re-orientate itself as the premier development agency, after external criticism and an internal evaluation. The first aim of streamlining bureaucracy was easily reached however the aim of being more "poverty focused and accountable" came at odds with the technical, economic and apolitical rationality. New efforts such as listening to clients and conducting consultations clashed with the existing approval culture. Overall, changes occurred but still the approval culture remained strong.
Similarly, the focus on good governance was not that effective with apolitical stances amongst staff. Furthermore, the dominating neo-liberal mindset resulted in governance issues framed with economic objectives in mind. Just as with the Strategic Compact, Weaver notes that governance reform challenged the Bank's conventional method of conducting business. Weaver does qualify that the constant need to placate the demands of various external groups also hampered Bank reform. She however noted that the Bank deep culture will prevent any productive change. Weaver thus delves away from the normal criticism of the World Bank to explain the reasons of Bank actions and activities. She shed a new light noting that such hypocrisy is a tenet in any large international organisation. In order for any improvement to the World Bank, it is not simply the initiation of change but the need to re work the internal settings of one of the world's most important development groups.
Under which environments does Weaver assess World Bank's hypocrisy?
  • a)
    The competitive and the accountable environments.
  • b)
    The combative and the democratic environments.
  • c)
    The combative and the authoritarian environments.
  • d)
    The competitive and the authoritarian environments.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Alok Mehra answered
Under which environments does Weaver assess World Bank's hypocrisy?
The competitive and the authoritarian environments.

Explanation:
- Weaver assesses World Bank's hypocrisy under the competitive environment, where the Bank interacts with multiple actors such as donor states, client states, private capital markets, and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). This competitive environment exerts various pressures on the Bank, impacting its decision-making processes.
- Additionally, Weaver also examines the authoritarian environment in which the World Bank operates. The Bank holds a strong degree of operational authority and autonomy, stemming from the complexity of its operations and the diversity of its member states.
- The Bank's monopoly over development-related knowledge, coupled with a strong ideological coherence influenced by neoliberal beliefs and Western-trained economists, further contributes to the authoritarian environment in which the Bank operates.
- These two environments, the competitive and the authoritarian, shape the actions and activities of the World Bank, leading to instances of hypocrisy as the Bank navigates its relationships with different stakeholders and maintains its operational autonomy.

Beauty is a valuable commodity in our image-obsessed society, so it's not surprising that Miss Indias and Miss Worlds make headlines. These young women aren't just beautiful; they're most often thin too. But Chloe Marshall, the 2008 Miss England runner-up, was size 16 ("full- figured" or "ample," to put it politely) and therefore made even more news. A full-figured beauty pageant finalist creating a stop-the-press moment highlights the fact that larger women are not usually considered "the fairest of them all." Indeed, pick up a magazine or newspaper on any other day and the message is loud and clear -thin is in. With the average woman hovering around a size 14 or above, the comparison is odious. A recent survey revealed only six percent of women aged 18 to 64 were "very satisfied" with their looks. That leaves 94 percent of women critical of their appearance. In other words, the majority of the women sitting with you in the metro this morning woke up feeling judgmental and negative about their looks. "If every woman in the world woke up, slapped herself on the head and said: 'I'm happy with who I am,' entire economies would collapse," says Jane Caro, an award-winning advertising writer.
The media is often portrayed as the bogeyman in the body-image debate, but experts say it's only part of the picture. Paxton notes women are getting messages from family from an early age. The way in which parents view their bodies impacts their children's attitudes. "A mother who is always dieting or being critical of her body is sending a clear message to her daughters," says Tiggemann. "That sense of body dissatisfaction is passed on." The anti-obesity push is also unhelpful. "It's shifted the focus away from health and onto weight and looks," she says. "It's perpetuating the notion that fat is bad, thin is good, and thinner is better." And it's a notion that has recently been proved to be untrue.
Which notion is being talked about in the last line of the passage?
  • a)
    Women's obsession with a slim figure is unhealthy.
  • b)
    Fat is bad and slim is good.
  • c)
    Fat is bad and slim is good is true.
  • d)
    The anti-obesity push is not helpful.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Explanation:

Notion being talked about:

Fat is bad and slim is good
- The notion that is being discussed in the last line of the passage is the idea that "fat is bad, and slim is good."
- This notion perpetuates the belief that being thin is superior to being larger in size.
- It creates a harmful standard of beauty that can lead to negative body image and self-esteem issues for many individuals.
- This belief is not only damaging to individuals but also perpetuates unrealistic beauty standards in society.
- It is important to challenge and debunk this notion by promoting body positivity and acceptance of all body types.

How many times do the hands of a clock coincide in a day?
  • a)
    24                           
  • b)
    21
  • c)
    20                           
  • d)
    22
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Kavya Sharma answered
The hands of a clock coincide 11 times in every 12 hours (Since between 11 and 1, they coincide only once, i.e., at 12 o'clock).

AM
12:00
1:05
2:11
3:16
4:22
5:27
6:33
7:38
8:44
9:49
10:55

PM
12:00
1:05
2:11
3:16
4:22
5:27
6:33
7:38
8:44
9:49
10:55
The hands overlap about every 65 minutes, not every 60 minutes.

 The hands coincide 22 times in a day.

Chapter doubts & questions for Passage Based for Practice - 4 Months Preparation Course for CLAT UG 2025 is part of CLAT exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.

Chapter doubts & questions of Passage Based for Practice - 4 Months Preparation Course for CLAT UG in English & Hindi are available as part of CLAT exam. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Top Courses CLAT

Related CLAT Content