All questions of Main Idea Based Questions for CLAT Exam

In an era where speed defines success, the idea of slow living stands as a quiet rebellion. This philosophy urges people to pause, savor moments, and prioritize meaning over haste. Rather than racing through tasks, slow living encourages deliberate choices—whether it’s cooking a meal from scratch, strolling through a park, or spending uninterrupted time with loved ones. It’s not about abandoning ambition but about finding balance in a world that glorifies constant productivity.
The appeal of slow living lies in its promise of clarity. By stepping back from the frenzy of deadlines and notifications, individuals can reconnect with their thoughts and values. For example, Priya, a graphic designer, once juggled endless projects, her days a blur of emails and meetings. Exhausted, she began dedicating evenings to gardening, finding that the simple act of tending plants grounded her. Her work improved, not because she worked harder, but because she approached it with renewed focus. Similarly, Arjun, a student, swapped late-night study marathons for shorter, mindful sessions, discovering he retained more by studying less but with greater attention.
Slow living also reshapes relationships. In a culture of instant messaging, taking time for face-to-face conversations fosters deeper connections. Families who share meals without screens often find their bonds strengthen through shared stories and laughter. Yet, slow living faces challenges—society rewards speed, and stepping away can feel like falling behind. Critics argue it’s a luxury, accessible only to those with flexible schedules. However, even small changes, like turning off notifications for an hour, can make a difference.
At its core, slow living is a call to reclaim time. It suggests that life’s richness lies not in doing more, but in doing what matters with intention. In a village or a bustling city, this approach invites us to find joy in the present, crafting a life that feels full, not frantic.

Which of the following best captures a supporting idea in the passage?

In an era where speed defines success, the idea of slow living stands as a quiet rebellion. This philosophy urges people to pause, savor moments, and prioritize meaning over haste. Rather than racing through tasks, slow living encourages deliberate choices—whether it’s cooking a meal from scratch, strolling through a park, or spending uninterrupted time with loved ones. It’s not about abandoning ambition but about finding balance in a world that glorifies constant productivity.
The appeal of slow living lies in its promise of clarity. By stepping back from the frenzy of deadlines and notifications, individuals can reconnect with their thoughts and values. For example, Priya, a graphic designer, once juggled endless projects, her days a blur of emails and meetings. Exhausted, she began dedicating evenings to gardening, finding that the simple act of tending plants grounded her. Her work improved, not because she worked harder, but because she approached it with renewed focus. Similarly, Arjun, a student, swapped late-night study marathons for shorter, mindful sessions, discovering he retained more by studying less but with greater attention.
Slow living also reshapes relationships. In a culture of instant messaging, taking time for face-to-face conversations fosters deeper connections. Families who share meals without screens often find their bonds strengthen through shared stories and laughter. Yet, slow living faces challenges—society rewards speed, and stepping away can feel like falling behind. Critics argue it’s a luxury, accessible only to those with flexible schedules. However, even small changes, like turning off notifications for an hour, can make a difference.
At its core, slow living is a call to reclaim time. It suggests that life’s richness lies not in doing more, but in doing what matters with intention. In a village or a bustling city, this approach invites us to find joy in the present, crafting a life that feels full, not frantic.

Which statement best reflects the author’s perspective on the impact of slow living?

In an era where speed defines success, the idea of slow living stands as a quiet rebellion. This philosophy urges people to pause, savor moments, and prioritize meaning over haste. Rather than racing through tasks, slow living encourages deliberate choices—whether it’s cooking a meal from scratch, strolling through a park, or spending uninterrupted time with loved ones. It’s not about abandoning ambition but about finding balance in a world that glorifies constant productivity.
The appeal of slow living lies in its promise of clarity. By stepping back from the frenzy of deadlines and notifications, individuals can reconnect with their thoughts and values. For example, Priya, a graphic designer, once juggled endless projects, her days a blur of emails and meetings. Exhausted, she began dedicating evenings to gardening, finding that the simple act of tending plants grounded her. Her work improved, not because she worked harder, but because she approached it with renewed focus. Similarly, Arjun, a student, swapped late-night study marathons for shorter, mindful sessions, discovering he retained more by studying less but with greater attention.
Slow living also reshapes relationships. In a culture of instant messaging, taking time for face-to-face conversations fosters deeper connections. Families who share meals without screens often find their bonds strengthen through shared stories and laughter. Yet, slow living faces challenges—society rewards speed, and stepping away can feel like falling behind. Critics argue it’s a luxury, accessible only to those with flexible schedules. However, even small changes, like turning off notifications for an hour, can make a difference.
At its core, slow living is a call to reclaim time. It suggests that life’s richness lies not in doing more, but in doing what matters with intention. In a village or a bustling city, this approach invites us to find joy in the present, crafting a life that feels full, not frantic.

What is the main idea of the passage?

In an era where speed defines success, the idea of slow living stands as a quiet rebellion. This philosophy urges people to pause, savor moments, and prioritize meaning over haste. Rather than racing through tasks, slow living encourages deliberate choices—whether it’s cooking a meal from scratch, strolling through a park, or spending uninterrupted time with loved ones. It’s not about abandoning ambition but about finding balance in a world that glorifies constant productivity.
The appeal of slow living lies in its promise of clarity. By stepping back from the frenzy of deadlines and notifications, individuals can reconnect with their thoughts and values. For example, Priya, a graphic designer, once juggled endless projects, her days a blur of emails and meetings. Exhausted, she began dedicating evenings to gardening, finding that the simple act of tending plants grounded her. Her work improved, not because she worked harder, but because she approached it with renewed focus. Similarly, Arjun, a student, swapped late-night study marathons for shorter, mindful sessions, discovering he retained more by studying less but with greater attention.
Slow living also reshapes relationships. In a culture of instant messaging, taking time for face-to-face conversations fosters deeper connections. Families who share meals without screens often find their bonds strengthen through shared stories and laughter. Yet, slow living faces challenges—society rewards speed, and stepping away can feel like falling behind. Critics argue it’s a luxury, accessible only to those with flexible schedules. However, even small changes, like turning off notifications for an hour, can make a difference.
At its core, slow living is a call to reclaim time. It suggests that life’s richness lies not in doing more, but in doing what matters with intention. In a village or a bustling city, this approach invites us to find joy in the present, crafting a life that feels full, not frantic.

What is the primary purpose of the author in writing this passage?

In an era where speed defines success, the idea of slow living stands as a quiet rebellion. This philosophy urges people to pause, savor moments, and prioritize meaning over haste. Rather than racing through tasks, slow living encourages deliberate choices—whether it’s cooking a meal from scratch, strolling through a park, or spending uninterrupted time with loved ones. It’s not about abandoning ambition but about finding balance in a world that glorifies constant productivity.
The appeal of slow living lies in its promise of clarity. By stepping back from the frenzy of deadlines and notifications, individuals can reconnect with their thoughts and values. For example, Priya, a graphic designer, once juggled endless projects, her days a blur of emails and meetings. Exhausted, she began dedicating evenings to gardening, finding that the simple act of tending plants grounded her. Her work improved, not because she worked harder, but because she approached it with renewed focus. Similarly, Arjun, a student, swapped late-night study marathons for shorter, mindful sessions, discovering he retained more by studying less but with greater attention.
Slow living also reshapes relationships. In a culture of instant messaging, taking time for face-to-face conversations fosters deeper connections. Families who share meals without screens often find their bonds strengthen through shared stories and laughter. Yet, slow living faces challenges—society rewards speed, and stepping away can feel like falling behind. Critics argue it’s a luxury, accessible only to those with flexible schedules. However, even small changes, like turning off notifications for an hour, can make a difference.
At its core, slow living is a call to reclaim time. It suggests that life’s richness lies not in doing more, but in doing what matters with intention. In a village or a bustling city, this approach invites us to find joy in the present, crafting a life that feels full, not frantic.

What does the author imply about society’s view of slow living?